Case law

O.F. Ex Rel. N.S. v. Chester Upland School District

246 F. Supp. 2d 409 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 10, 2002

The Supreme Court explained the reason behind the unique issues presented in “failure to train” cases in Board of the County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … However, since the Supreme Court decided a highly relevant case in the interim, Board of Trustees of the Univ. of Alabama v.

Mack v. General Electric Co.

63 F.R.D. 368 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 12, 1974

Notice of this action pursuant to court order was delivered to all employees, posted on bulletin boards throughout the plant, and publicized in area newspapers. … This limited intervention to protect future rights where general intervention is barred by untimeliness was allowed by Judge Weber in Hoots v.

Franklin v. SKF USA INC.

126 F. Supp. 2d 911 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 2000

Larrison, 750 A.2d 895, 898 (Pa.Super.2000) (citing Griffith v. United Air Lines, 416 Pa. 1 , 203 A.2d 796, 805 (1964)). … Refac Financial Corp. v.

Anderson v. the Bakery and Confectionery Union

654 F. Supp. 2d 267 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 3, 2009

Deference to the Board of Trustees The parties disagree as to the level of deference that the court must afford to the Plan Denial by the Board of Trustees. Citing Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. … Co. v.

Corrigan v. Methodist Hospital

857 F. Supp. 434 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 11, 1994

See Also: Robinson v. … Likewise, in Atkins v.

Foulke v. Bethlehem 1980 Salaried Pension Plan

565 F. Supp. 882 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1983

Kempken, Secretary of defendant General Pension Board. As such, the motion is properly treated as one for summary judgment. Nasser v. City of Homewood, 671 F.2d 432, 434 (11th Cir.1982); Townsend v. … Cf., Wright v.

Wilson v. City of Philadelphia

177 F. Supp. 3d 885 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 8, 2016

Brown, 417 A.2d at 186 . … Brady v. Maryland In Brady v.

Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader

20 F. Supp. 138 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 1937

Fruehauf Trailer Co., 57 S.Ct. 642 , 81 L.Ed. 918 , 108 A.L.R. 1352 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co., 57 S.Ct. 645 , 81 L.Ed. 921 , 108 A.L.R. 1352 ; Washington, V. & M. Coach Co. v. … National Labor Relations Board, 57 S.Ct. 648 , 81 L.Ed. 965 ; Associated Press v.

Local 384, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. Patane

232 F. Supp. 740 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 5, 1964

B. v. Niles Fire Brick Co., 124 F.2d 366 (6 Cir. 1941), cert. den. 316 U.S. 664 , 62 S.Ct. 944 , 86 L.Ed. 1740 . … B. v. Ozark Dam Constructors, 190 F.2d 222 , (8 Cir. 1951). The leading principle was stated in N. L. R. B. v.

Wilensky v. Olympic Airways, S. A.

73 F.R.D. 473 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 1977

In Rodriquez v. … In Nader v.

Keim v. County of Bucks

275 F. Supp. 2d 628 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 29, 2003

See, Brown v. Muhlenberg Township, 269 F.3d 205, 213 (3d Cir.2001); Reich v. Beharry, 883 F.2d 239, 244 (3d Cir.1989). … Gilbert v. Homar, 520 U.S. 924, 928-929 , 117 S.Ct. 1807, 1811 , 138 L.Ed.2d 120 (1997); Bradley v. Pittsburgh Board of *634 Education, 913 F.2d 1064, 1077 (3d Cir.1990).

Barr Marine Products Co. v. Borg-Warner Corp.

84 F.R.D. 631 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 27, 1979

Brown, president and general manager, Warner Gear Division; J. F. Wallace, vice-president —finance, Warner Gear Division. … Arguably Brown is therefore not a member of the control group. For the purpose of analyzing this document, however, I will assume that Brown is a control group member.

DeMarines v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

433 F. Supp. 1047 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 1977

In Mertens, the Second Circuit held that presenting a ticket to a passenger after he had boarded the plane did not constitute “delivery” as a matter of law. A similar result was reached by the Ninth Circuit in Warren v. … In Ross v.

Irving-Cloud Publishing Co. v. Chilton Co.

463 F. Supp. 476 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 1978

Consequently, the decisions of the Board to cancel trademarks are not binding upon a court of equity in litigation to determine the rights of usage of trademarks. See Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. … Graham v.

Lewis v. School District

443 F. Supp. 923 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 1978

See, e. g., Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 572-74 , 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569, 576-78 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v. … E. g., Mount Healthy City Bd. of Educ. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 283 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977) (by implication); Goss v. Lopez, supra, 419 U.S. at 573 , 95 S.Ct. 729 (dictum); Board of Regents v.

Dickheiser v. Pennsylvania R.

5 F.R.D. 5 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 11, 1945

Brensilber v. … Toucey v.

Strother v. Nardolillo

583 F. Supp. 2d 645 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 14, 2008

Hill Correctional Facility, Strother received notice that the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (the “Parole Board”) had ordered him to serve an additional 23 months and 20 days incarceration for his violation of … This petition was denied by the Parole Board on March 2, 2006. (Id.).

Creelman v. Carpenters Pension & Annuity Fund

945 F. Supp. 2d 592 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 14, 2013

Accordingly, the Court applies the deferential “arbitrary and capricious” standard of review to the Board’s denial of benefits. 6 Miller, 632 F.3d at 844-45; Abnathya v. … In Demirovic v.

United States v. Two Lots of Ground

183 F. Supp. 355 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 1960

One Joe Brown purchased certain real estate 1 in Reading, Pennsylvania, from David Realty Corporation and gave that corporation a purchase money mortgage in the sum of $42,000. … The deed to Joe Brown, the mortgage to David Realty Corporation, and the assignment to the bank were all dated January 10, 1957, and were all recorded 2 January 17, 1957.

Creamer v. AIM Telephones, Inc.

159 B.R. 440 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 8, 1993

Estate of Friedman v. Schoolman, 483 Pa. 614, 634 , 398 A.2d 615, 625 (1978) (quoting Fahringer v. Strine Estate, 420 Pa. 48, 53-55 , 216 A.2d 82, 85-86 (1966)). … See Fried v. Fisher, 328 Pa. 497, 501 , 196 A. 39, 41 (1938); Sunseri v. Sunseri, 358 Pa. 1, 6 , 55 A.2d 370 (1947).