Case law

St. Claire v. Cuyler

481 F. Supp. 732 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1979

of any Parole Board policy forbidding the wearing of hats at Parole Board hearings. 17 . … Defendants have the burden of pleading and proving the good faith defense, Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg St. College, 538 F.2d 53 (3d Cir.)

United States v. Johns-Manville Corporation

245 F. Supp. 74 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 1965

The feature which the Government seeks to emphasize about this agreement is that Certain-teed dictated the prices of asbestos-cement pipe sold by Browning, but in all other respects Browning resembled an independent distributor … Poller v.

American Medicorp, Inc. v. Humana, Inc.

445 F. Supp. 589 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 1977

The activities of the major proprietary chains form a distinct sub-market pursuant to the criteria established in Brown Shoe Co. v. … See Brown Shoe, supra, at 336 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 ; United States v. Marine Ban-corporation, 418 U.S. 602, 621 , 98 S.Ct. 2856 , 41 L.Ed.2d 978 (1974).

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. United Transportation Union

947 F. Supp. 168 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 19, 1996

In Boston and Maine Corp. v. … In its decision, the court described this board as the "Public Law Board,” the "Adjustment Board,” and the "National Railroad Adjustment Board.” See Springfield Terminal, 767 F.Supp. at 335, 340, 343, 345 .

Heller v. CACL Federal Credit Union

775 F. Supp. 839 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 1991

John Heller, the plaintiff in this action, was a duly elected CACL board member. … Because the plaintiff was no longer bonded, he was removed from CACL’s board on September 15, 1990.

Powell v. First Republic Bank

274 F. Supp. 2d 660 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 29, 2003

See e.g., Lewis v. … .’”); Stein v.

Gregory v. Chehi

654 F. Supp. 670 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 2, 1987

After reviewing the hearing record, the court affirmed the Board of Supervisors’ decision holding that the “decision of the Board ... and the manner in which they reached it was both fair and reasonable.” Gregory v. … Laskaris v. Thornburgh, 733 F.2d 260, 265 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 886 , 105 S.Ct. 260 , 83 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984). See Branti v. Finkel, 445 U.S. 507 , 100 S.Ct. 1287 , 63 L.Ed.2d 574 (1980); Elrod v.

United States v. Croce

334 F. Supp. 2d 781 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 8, 2004

Holdsworth, A History of English Law 47 (Little, Brown, & Co.1923) [hereinafter Holdsworth]. … Alexander was not the only lawyer at the Cook County Board of Appeals trough. Richard A.

Medei v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

617 F. Supp. 372 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 1985

Gaines v. The Amalgamated Insurance Fund, 753 F.2d 288 (3d Cir.1985), Wolf v. National Shopmen Pension Fund, 728 F.2d 182 (3d Cir. 1984), Rosen v. … See, Czyz v. General Pension Board, Bethlehem Steel Corporation, 578 F.Supp. 126 (W.D. Pa.1983), Prusak v. Bethlehem 1980 Salaried Pension Plan, 618 F.Supp. 530 (W.D. N.Y.1984), Reynolds v.

Lenowitz v. Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.

502 F. Supp. 428 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 1980

In Jablon v. … Similarly, in Lank v.

United States ex rel. Chatary v. Rundle

282 F. Supp. 926 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 1968

A more expansive statement of facts may be seen in the notes of testimony of Commonwealth v. … The agent was told that Draper was a Negro of light brown complexion, 27 years old, 5 feet 8 inches tall, weight 160 pounds, and that he would be wearing a light colored raincoat, brown slacks and black shoes. .

Blair & Co. v. Shober

35 F.R.D. 533 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 1964

Justice Jackson in Sartor v. … Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v.

Bessel v. Clyde

22 F.R.D. 15 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 10, 1958

The Board is designated as the New York Board and has its headquarters there. It holds hearings, in accordance with the directives governing it, wherever convenient. … The third member of the Board has not been served. I regret that I find myself unable to agree with the conclusion reached by Judge Welsh of this court in Cohen v. Leone, D.C., 18 F.R.D. 494 .

Continental Access Control Systems, Inc. v. Racal-Vikonics, Inc.

101 F.R.D. 418 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1983

Roesberg v. Johns-Mansville, 85 F.R.D. 292, 296 (E.D.Pa.1980). Weahkee v. Norton, 621 F.2d 1080, 1082 (10th Cir.1980). … Interrogatories should be sent to the other Board members to elicit the existence of such notes. The facts and circumstances of this case determine and limit relevance. Shang v.

THE WOLK LAW FIRM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 10, 2019

: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION : SAFETY BOARD … Clear Sky Car Wash LLC v.

In Re Sears, Roebuck and Co. Securities Lit.

792 F. Supp. 977 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 1, 1992

In the case of Lewis v. … In Acosta v.

Northeast Jet Center, Ltd. v. Lehigh-Northampton Airport Authority

767 F. Supp. 672 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 31, 1991

.”); Medical Laundry Services v. Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama, 906 F.2d 571 (11th Cir.1990) (breach of contract claim was not a sufficient basis for a § 1983 action). … v.

Revello v. Paul Revere Life Insurance

224 F. Supp. 2d 946 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 2002

See: Lake v. Arnold, 232 F.3d 360, 365 (3d Cir.2000); Allah v. Seiverling, 229 F.3d 220, 223 (3d Cir.2000). … Revello, DPM App # 21280 Julius Meister # 01207567160 NAFYC-762- In further support of its argument, Defendant cites to Judge Shapiro’s recent decision in Brown v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, Civ.

Ka Together, Inc. v. Aspen Specialty Ins. Co.

362 F. Supp. 3d 281 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 24, 2019

that [Plaintiff] and the Browns did not have the necessary relationship of trust or confidence. … While the facts surrounding the entrustment relationship between the plaintiff and the Browns in F.D.

Black v. Rizzo

360 F. Supp. 648 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 8, 1973

Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 605-606 , 87 S.Ct. 675, 685 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1734 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). As was said in Perry v. … Stull v. School Board of Western Beaver Junior-Senior High School, 459 F.2d 339 (3d Cir. 1972); Massie v. Henry, 455 F.2d 779 (4th Cir. 1972); Gere v. Stanley, 453 F.2d 205 (3d Cir. 1971); Bishop v.