Case law

White v. Ottinger

442 F. Supp. 2d 236 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 9, 2006

V. … In Farmer v.

Maldonado ex rel. Maldonado v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.

841 F. Supp. 2d 890 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 2011

It challenges the determination in Brewer v. SmithKline Beacham Corp., 774 F.Supp.2d 720 (E.D.Pa. … LLC argues that we misapplied the "nerve center" test announced in Hertz Corp. v.

Nicklos v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

346 F. Supp. 185 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 1, 1972

The ruling of the Workmen’s Compensation Board was appealed to the state court 1 and was affirmed. … Hartwell v. Allied Chemical Corp., 457 F.2d 1335 (3d Cir. 1972); O’Neill v. United States, 450 F.2d 1012 (3d Cir. 1971); Schick v. Good Humor Corp., 438 F.2d 336 (3d Cir. 1971).

American Library Ass'n, Inc. v. United States

201 F. Supp. 2d 401 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 31, 2002

Examples of designated fora in-elude university meeting facilities, see Widmar v. Vincent, 454 U.S. 263 , 102 S.Ct. 269 , 70 L.Ed.2d 440 (1981), school board meetings, see City of Madison Joint School Dist. v. Wisc. … Student Government Ass’n v. Board of Trustees, supra, 868 F.2d at 482 .

United States v. Stegmaier

397 F. Supp. 611 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 1975

Brown, testified as to the medicines which Mrs. Pollack took and the effect they had on her. Mrs. Brown said that at times Mrs. … v.

Homan v. City of Reading

963 F. Supp. 485 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 20, 1997

Id. at 679 (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)). … See, e.g., Maynard v.

In re Alverto

198 F. 688 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 1912

Gonzales v. Williams, 192 U. S. 1 , 24 Sup. Ct. 171, 48 L. Ed. 317 . … “Free white persons” includes members of the white, or Caucasian race, as distinct from the black, red, yellow, and brown races. United States v. Balsara, 180 Fed. 694 , 103 C. C. A. 660 ; In re Ah Yup, Fed. Cas.

Mayers v. Ewing

102 F. Supp. 201 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 1952

. § 405, to review the action of the Social Security Board. The claimants are the illegitimate minor children of Aloysius V. … Just a word concerning Ray v. Social Security Board, D.C.S.D.Ala., 73 F. Supp. 58 , which plaintiff feels should be controlling in this case.

Heller v. CACL Federal Credit Union

775 F. Supp. 839 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 1991

John Heller, the plaintiff in this action, was a duly elected CACL board member. … Because the plaintiff was no longer bonded, he was removed from CACL’s board on September 15, 1990.

De Gennaro v. Pennsylvania R. Co.

68 F. Supp. 269 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 1946

I have recently held that the question of the legal sufficiency of a defense may be raised by a motion to strike, in the case of Day & Zimmerman v. Feraco, D.C., 4 F.R.D. 400 . … See Hoffman v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 2 Cir., 74 F.2d 227 ; Zimmerman v. Scan-drett, D.C., 57 F.Supp. 799 .

Rackin v. University of Pennsylvania

386 F. Supp. 992 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 1974

Brown, 270 F.Supp. 782 (D.C.1967), aff’d, 392 F.2d 120 (3d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 391 U.S. 921 , 88 S.Ct. 1811 , 20 L.Ed.2d 657 (1968). … (a) Tax exemptions: Blackburn v. Fisk University, 443 F.2d 121 (6th Cir. 1971); Browns v. Mitchell, 409 F.2d 593 (10th Cir. T969); Furumoto v. Lyman, 362 F.Supp. 1267 (N.D.Cal.1971); McLeod v.

Roma Concrete Corp. v. Pension Assocs.

384 F. Supp. 3d 507 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 2019

Certainteed Ceilings Corp. , 2015 WL 410029 , at *7 (quoting Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Cola , 745 F. Supp. 2d 588 , 619-20 (E.D. Pa. 2010) (Buckwalter, J.) (internal quotation marks omitted))). … Certainteed Ceilings Corp. , 2015 WL 410029 , at *7 (quoting Brown & Brown , 745 F. Supp. 2d at 620 ) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Medei v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

617 F. Supp. 372 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 1985

Gaines v. The Amalgamated Insurance Fund, 753 F.2d 288 (3d Cir.1985), Wolf v. National Shopmen Pension Fund, 728 F.2d 182 (3d Cir. 1984), Rosen v. … See, Czyz v. General Pension Board, Bethlehem Steel Corporation, 578 F.Supp. 126 (W.D. Pa.1983), Prusak v. Bethlehem 1980 Salaried Pension Plan, 618 F.Supp. 530 (W.D. N.Y.1984), Reynolds v.

Lenowitz v. Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.

502 F. Supp. 428 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 1980

In Jablon v. … Similarly, in Lank v.

Violi v. Reese

343 F. Supp. 462 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 31, 1972

. *468 Thus, I hold that this case is controlled by the cases of Gonzales v. United States and Crotty v. Kelly, supra. … See, Ehlert v. United States, 402 U.S. 99 , 91 S.Ct. 1319 , 28 L.Ed.2d 625 (1971), discussed infra at pages 466 to 467. . Gonzales v. United States, supra, p. 413, 75 S.Ct. p. 413. .

Barnes Foundation v. Township of Lower Merion

927 F. Supp. 874 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 1996

Heritage Farms Inc. v. … Compare Hicks v.

United States ex rel. Chatary v. Rundle

282 F. Supp. 926 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 1968

A more expansive statement of facts may be seen in the notes of testimony of Commonwealth v. … The agent was told that Draper was a Negro of light brown complexion, 27 years old, 5 feet 8 inches tall, weight 160 pounds, and that he would be wearing a light colored raincoat, brown slacks and black shoes. .

Blair & Co. v. Shober

35 F.R.D. 533 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 1964

Justice Jackson in Sartor v. … Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v.

Gallagher v. De Lancey Stables Co.

158 F. 381 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 1908

It kept horses for hire, and took them to board, and it was engaged in nothing else. … No. 10,426; Martin v. Nightingale, 3 Bingham (E. C. L.) 421; Wright v. Bird, 1 Price (Eng. Exch.) 20; Stewart v. Ball, 2 Bingham New Rep. (E. C. L.) 18; Re Morton Boarding Stables (D. C.) 108 Fed. 191 ; Re Quimby Co.

Continental Access Control Systems, Inc. v. Racal-Vikonics, Inc.

101 F.R.D. 418 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1983

Roesberg v. Johns-Mansville, 85 F.R.D. 292, 296 (E.D.Pa.1980). Weahkee v. Norton, 621 F.2d 1080, 1082 (10th Cir.1980). … Interrogatories should be sent to the other Board members to elicit the existence of such notes. The facts and circumstances of this case determine and limit relevance. Shang v.