Case law

Cohen v. Leone

18 F.R.D. 494 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1955

or a reeission of the Board’s order of March 24, 1955. … Personnel Security Board in Washington, D.

Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Bolger

771 F. Supp. 686 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 3, 1991

Turner v. Schering-Plough Corp., 901 F.2d 335, 340-41 (3d Cir.1990). For a dispute to be “genuine,” the evidence must be such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the non-moving party. Anderson v. … Celotex v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986).

Kielczynski v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

837 F. Supp. 687 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 1993

U.S. v. Brown University, 772 F.Supp. 241, 243 (E.D.Pa.1991). … Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert, 330 U.S. 501, 508-509 , 67 S.Ct. 839, 843 , 91 L.Ed. 1055 (1947); U.S. v. Brown University, supra, at 242-243; National Mortgage Network v.

United States v. Stout

723 F. Supp. 297 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 11, 1989

See United States v. … In Wheat v.

Carlton Properties, Inc. v. Crescent City Leasing Corp.

212 F. Supp. 370 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 1962

F & L Drug Corp. v. American Central Insurance Co., 200 F.Supp. 718 (D.Conn.1961); Browne v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, 168 F.Supp. 796 (N.D.Illinois, E.D.1959). … What was stated in Browne, a fairly analogous case, is equally pertinent here. 168 F.

Various v. Various

673 F. Supp. 2d 358 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 2009

Steel Valley Auth., 809 F.2d at 1010 (citing Abels v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 770 F.2d 26, 29 (3d Cir.1985)); accord Brown v. Francis, 75 F.3d 860, 865 (3d Cir.1996); Boyer, 913 F.2d at 111 . … Smith 2006-70 09-cv-63600 Brown Isaac Smith 2006-71 09-CV-63291 Brown James Lavern Jones 2006-146-CV3 09-cv-63211 Brown Kenneth M. Jones 2006-122-CV3 09-CV-63207 Brown Randy K. Smith 2006-175 09-CV-63292 Brown Billy G.

THE WOLK LAW FIRM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 2021

(NTSB or Board) is not a party . . ..” … Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 20 F.Supp. 3d 260, 268 (D.D.C. 2014) (quoting Celetex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986); Am. Civil Liberties Union v.

Furey v. Temple University

884 F. Supp. 2d 223 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 3, 2012

Winnick v. Manning, 460 F.2d 545, 550 (2d Cir.1972). … Gabrilowitz v. Newman, 582 F.2d 100, 103 (1st Cir.1978).

Kalman v. Cortes

723 F. Supp. 2d 766 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 2010

(Brown Dep. 42:23-44:12.) Ms. … Brown, and Ms.

United States Ex Rel. Savage v. Arnold

403 F. Supp. 172 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 1975

United States v. Blierley, 331 F.Supp. 1182 (W.D.Pa.1971); Brown v. Duggan, 329 F.Supp. 207 (W.D.Pa. 1971); United States ex rel. Spader v. … Brown v. Duggan, supra, at 210.

Philadelphia Musical Society, Local 77 v. American Federation of Musicians of the United States & Canada

812 F. Supp. 509 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 1992

See also Local No. 48 v. United Bhd. of Carpenters, 920 F.2d 1047, 1052-53 (1st Cir.1990) (citing various circuit cases); Loretangeli v. Critelli, 853 F.2d 186, 192-93 (3d Cir.1988); Kleppick v. … Compare United Bhd. of Carpenters Local No. 267 v.

Ethanol Partners Accredited v. Wiener, Zuckerbrot, Weiss & Brecher

635 F. Supp. 18 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 13, 1985

In Wasnowic v. … In Milnarik v.

Holthusen v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co.

52 F. Supp. 125 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 1943

In Rogers v. … Richardson v.

Duva v. Bridgeport Textron

632 F. Supp. 880 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 1985

See Baker v. Stuart Broadcasting Co., 560 F.2d 389, 391 (8th Cir.1977); Bell v. Brown, 557 F.2d 849, 853 (D.C.Cir.1977); Guyette v. Stauffer Chem. Co., 518 F.Supp. 521, 526 (D.N.J.1981). … Mazzare v.

Holman v. Carpenter Technology Corp.

484 F. Supp. 406 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 24, 1980

Gay, 86 U.S. (19 Wall.) 81, 82-83 , 22 L.Ed. 100 (1874), Gates v. Osborne, 76 U.S. (9 Wall.) 567, 575 , 19 L.Ed. 748 (1869), Brown v. Keene, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 112, 115 , 8 L.Ed. 885 (1834), Hodgson v. … United States Steel Corp., supra (where board of directors delegated to the corporation’s operation policy committee the duty of conducting business relating to manufacturing, mining, transportation and general operation,

Bowie v. Williams

351 F. Supp. 628 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 1972

The plaintiffs rely almost exclusively on Rising v. Brown, 313 F.Supp. 824 (C.D.Cal.1970). This case found an abuse of the franking privilege. Both parties were Congressmen running for the Senate. … Straus v. Gilbert, supra and Rising v. Brown, supra, were decided June 11, 1968, and June 1, 1970, respectively. P.L. 91-375 was enacted August 12, 1970. 17 . Compare Common Cause v.

Air Dispatch, Inc. v. United States

237 F. Supp. 450 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 1964

Plaintiffs assert that the Civil Aeronautics Board (C. A. B. or Board) is the exclusive arbiter of this question by virtue of sections 101(20) and (21), 102, 403(a), 404 and 412(a) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958. … The plaintiffs cite City of Philadelphia v. C. A.

Stever-Wolford, Inc. v. United States

198 F. Supp. 166 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 1961

It is admitted that by November 13, 1958, the plaintiff, Stever-Wolford, Inc., had submitted claim forms to Postmaster Brown of the Upper Darby Post Office. 1 Thus, the plaintiff complied with the statute by presenting its … by the insurance company under its right of subrogation * * “If you also represent the insurance company, you may have your client submit a claim in its own name and right in accordance with the ruling in United States v.

Burns v. Supermarkets General Corp.

615 F. Supp. 154 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1985

Browning’s letter of May 8, 1984, directed to the company accompanying the return of the checks for safekeeping but clarifying that their return would not in any way affect the settlement agreement reached. … The Unfair Labor Practice Claim The National Labor Relations Board has exclusive jurisdiction of this claim and it must be dismissed here for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. An appropriate order follows.

Toth v. Bethel Township

268 F. Supp. 3d 725 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 24, 2017

Stana v. Sch. … where the board did not reappoint Jaglowicz — or Toth.