Case law

Bailey v. United Airlines, Inc.

101 F. Supp. 2d 311 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 13, 2000

Board of Review had recommended. … May 2, 1996); Guarnaccia v.

Wilson v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

709 F. Supp. 623 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 1989

Kline v. Harrisburg, 362 Pa. 438, 443-44 , 68 A.2d 182 (1949). … Card v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania School Employes’ Retirement Board), 83 Pa.Cmwlth. 602 , 478 A.2d 510, 514 (1984).

Reliance Lumber Co. v. Rothschild

127 F. 745 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1904

In Marquardt v. French, (D. … Cox v. Murray, Abb. Adm. 342 , Fed. Cas. No. 3,304. In Plummer v. Webb, 4 Mason, 388 , Fed. Cas.

Giordani v. Hoffmann

295 F. Supp. 463 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 10, 1969

They also named as defendants three organizations composed of groups of these individuals, i. e. the Board of Trustees of the Health and Welfare Fund, the General Executive Board of the U.I.U., and the Board of Governors … These individual defendants constitute the governing bodies of the three entity-defendants, i. e. the General Executive Board of the U.I.U., the Board of Trustees of the Welfare Fund, and the Board of Governors of the Pension

Axelrod v. Stoltz

264 F. Supp. 536 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 15, 1967

Defendants are the Hotel, Motel and Club Employees’ Union Local 568, AFL (Local), the president and the secretary of Local and the Philadelphia Local Joint Executive Board of the International Union (Joint Executive Board … See Lowery v. International Bhd. of Boilermakers, 241 Miss. 458 , 130 So. 2d 831, 838 (1961); Leibson v. Henry, 356 Mo. 953 , 204 S.W.2d 310 (1947); Black, Law Dictionary 1615-16 (4th ed. 1951); cf. Bishop v.

National Railroad Passenger v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

665 F. Supp. 402 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1987

The composition of the board of directors is heavily influenced by the federal government. 45 U.S.C. § 543 . … But cf., Pennsylvania v. Brown, 373 F.2d 771, 777 (3d Cir.1967) (an issue clearly presented to a court is taken to be covered by the court’s decision even if the issue is not addressed in the court’s opinion).

Zizi v. Bausman

306 F. Supp. 3d 697 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 2018

the burden, even though both the Board and USCIS director recited the correct one. … Zizi's final argument is that the decision by the Board is arbitrary and capricious.

Pennsylvania Railroad v. Local 2013 of United Railroad Workers Division of Transport Workers Union

178 F. Supp. 53 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 13, 1959

In Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. … or a Board of Adjustment.

Werts v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n

48 B.R. 980 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 1985

In F.T.C. v. … For example, in Roberts v.

Coover v. Saucon Valley School District

955 F. Supp. 392 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 26, 1997

She makes this claim under Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138 , 103 S.Ct. 1684 , 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983); Watters v. … Defendant Board Members were relying on the advice of Solicitor Steele, who drafted the July 19th letter and presented it to Coover. See Kincade v.

Emaus Silk Co. v. McCaughn

6 F.2d 660 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 1925

Cheatham v. United States, 92 U. S. 85 , 23 L. Ed. 561 ; State Railroad Tax Cases, 92 U. S. 575 , 23 L. Ed. 663 ; Snyder v. Marks, 109 U. S. 189 , 3 S. Ct. 157 , 27 L. Ed. 901 ; Bailey v. George, 259 U. S. 16 , 42 S. … Ed. 816 ; *662 Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co., 259 U. S. 20 , 42 S. Ct. 449 , 66 L. Ed. 817 , 21 A. L. R. 1432; Graham, Collector, v. Du Pont, 262 U. S. 234 , 43 S. Ct. 567 , 67 L. Ed. 965 .

Bodor v. East Coventry Township

325 F. Supp. 1102 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 1971

Quinlan, 314 F.Supp 685, 689 (W.D.Pa.1970); Landry v. Daley, 280 F.Supp. 929, 937 (N.D.Ill.1967); Moody v. … Service Employee’s International Union, AFL-CIO v. County of Butler, Pennsylvania, 306 F.Supp. 1080 (W.D.Pa.1969); Atkins v. City of Charlotte, 296 F.Supp. 1068 (W.D.N.C.1969); Adams v.

Roberts v. Trapnell

213 F. Supp. 47 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 1962

Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167, 187, 191 , 81 S.Ct. 473 , 5 L.Ed.2d 492 (1961); Egan v. City of Aurora, Ill., 365 U.S. 514 , 81 S.Ct. 684 , 5 L.Ed.2d 741 (1961); Hewitt v. … See, also, United States v. State of Alabama, 171 F.Supp. 720 (M.D.Ala.1959), where it was held at pp. 726-728 that “The Board of Registrars of Macon County, Alabama” could not be sued under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1971 .

Parker v. Bell Asbestos Mines, Ltd.

607 F. Supp. 1397 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 6, 1985

See Phelps v. McDonald, 99 U.S. (IX Otto) 298, 25 L.Ed. 473 (1878). … Barber v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., No. G.D. 79-21544 (Pa.C.P.Ct. Oct. 11, 1984); see also Westerby v. Raymark Industries, Inc., No. 83-61 (D.N.J.

Gershenfeld v. Justices of the Supreme Court of Pa.

641 F. Supp. 1419 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 19, 1986

At 124 (quoting Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 1495 n. 12, 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985)). … See Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, supra, 470 U.S. at 532 , 105 S.Ct. at 1495 .

Yeager v. C. Schmidt & Sons, Inc.

343 F. Supp. 927 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 15, 1972

Local 760 v. Morley, 378 F.2d 738 (9th Cir. 1967). … Cefalo v. International Union of Dist. 50 United Mine Wkrs., 311 F.Supp. 946 (D.C.D.C.1970).

Lal v. Nix

935 F. Supp. 578 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 25, 1996

I have also considered the transcript of Lai’s hearing before the board and the state supreme court docket sheet showing the court’s order denying his admission. Cf. Oshiver v. … Police Benevolent Ass’n, Inc. v.

BAIR v. SOLANCO SCHOOL DISTRICT

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 10, 2020

See Brown, 250 F.3d at 799. … The district superintendent shall have a seat on the board of school directors of the district, and the right to speak on all matters before the board, but not to vote. 30

United States ex rel. Pope v. Williams

326 F. Supp. 279 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1971

California, 406 F.2d 39 (9th Cir. 1969); Paige v. Pennsylvania Board of Parole, 311 F.Supp. 940 (E.D.Pa.1970); Gallagher v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 287 F.Supp. 610 (E.D.Pa.1968). … Ford v. Board of Mgrs. of New Jersey State Prison, 407 F.2d 937 (3rd Cir. 1969); Gurcznski v. Yeager, 339 F.2d 884 (3rd Cir. 1964); United States ex rel. Duronio v. Russell, 256 F.Supp. 479 (M.D.Pa.1966).

United States ex rel. Goldstein v. McNamara

270 F. Supp. 892 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1967

Eagles v. United States ex rel. Samuels, 329 U.S. 304 , 67 S.Ct. 313 , 91 L.Ed. 308 (1946); United States ex rel. Weidman v. Sweeney, 117 F.Supp. 739 (E.D.Pa.1953). … Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114 , 66 S.Ct. 423 , 90 L.Ed. 567 (1946); see also, Eagles v. United States ex rel. Samuels, 329 U.S. 304 , 67 S.Ct. 313 (1946). CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1.