Case law

United States v. Heljenek

275 F. Supp. 579 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 6, 1967

The Board’s action must be sustained if there is some factual support for it. Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114 , 66 S.Ct. 423 , 90 L.Ed. 567 (1946); United States v. … United States v. Sturgis, supra; United States v. Kovalchick, supra. Due Process.

King Aluminum Corp. v. William Hyndman III Insurance Agency, Inc.

370 F. Supp. 621 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 7, 1974

The Supreme Court of Iowa was faced with a similar claim in the case of Brown Manufacturing Company v. Crouse, 251 Iowa 594 , 102 N.W.2d 154 (1960). … Brown, supra, at 102 N.W.2d 157 , 158. In the present case, we are in agreement with the position expressed by the Court in Brown.

McMullan v. Thornburgh

508 F. Supp. 1044 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 4, 1981

Healthy Board of *1051 Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 [ 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 ] (1977). … Good faith, after all, was part of the unsuccessful defense in Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954) itself. 6 .

Roberts v. Lehigh & New England Railway Co.

211 F. Supp. 379 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 1962

This is-precisely the style of interpretive functions with which the Board has been charged. *382 The instant case differs from Felter v. … Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Howard, 343 U.S. 768 , 72 S.Ct. 1022 , 96 L.Ed. 1283 (1952); Tunstall v.

Trinsey v. COM. OF PA., DEPT. OF STATE

766 F. Supp. 1338 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 1991

See Moore v. … In Nixon v. Herndon, Nixon v. Condon, Smith v. Allwright, and Terry v.

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Delaware & Hudson Railway Co.

499 F. Supp. 967 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1980

Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad v. … 45 U.S.C. § 153 , Union Pacific Railroad v.

Lakits v. York

258 F. Supp. 2d 401 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 2003

See, e.g., Brown v. Philadelphia College of Osteo. … City of Philadelphia v. Brown, 152 Pa.Cmwlth. 343 , 618 A.2d 1236, 1238 (1992). 3 . The case of Keich v. Frost, 63 Pa. D. & C.2d 499 , 1973 WL 15317 (C.C.P.

Lord v. Lehman

540 F. Supp. 125 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 9, 1982

that the Correction Board’s decision was illegal .... ” Sanders v. … Manzo v. Lehman, supra, slip op. at 6, citing Neal v. Secretary of Navy, supra.

Chasis v. Progress Manufacturing Co.

256 F. Supp. 747 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 2, 1966

To treat this as a suit under Section 301, and thus not subject to the primary jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Board would be a significant extension of the rule of Smith v. Evening News Ass’n, supra. … Once the Board has taken jurisdiction over this area, the policies of preemption seem fully applicable to a suit under the Steele doctrine. Alexander v.

United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America (UE), Local 107 v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

229 F. Supp. 881 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 19, 1964

See, e. g., National Labor Relations Board v. … : National Labor Relations Board v.

United States v. Philadelphia Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends

753 F. Supp. 1300 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 1990

See Thomas v. Review Board, 450 U.S. 707, 718 , 101 S.Ct. 1425, 1432 , 67 L.Ed.2d 624 (1982). U.S. v. … United States v.

Aqua Bar & Lounge, Inc. v. United States

438 F. Supp. 655 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 1977

Plaintiff Aqua Bar & Lounge, Inc. was the owner of a restaurant liquor license issued by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board. … See Aqua Bar & Lounge, Inc. v. United States Dept. of Treasury, 539 F.2d 935 (3d Cir. 1976).

United States v. Cohen

455 F. Supp. 843 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 1978

United States v. *852 Miah, supra, 433 F.Supp. at 264 . … United States v. Pacente, 503 F.2d 543, 547-548 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1048 , 95 S.Ct. 623 , 42 L.Ed.2d 642 (1974); see United States v.

Combined Patents Can Co. v. Lloyd

11 F. 153 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 4, 1882

Carlton v. Bokee, 17 Wall. 463 . … And in the English patents of Henrietta Brown and Walter Brown, dated in 1850 and 1855, respectively, the application of solder by bathing to metal joints, to render them fluid-tight, is directed and described, and is spoken

HUGHSTON v. MCGEE

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 10, 2023

McGee, Assistant Warden Berger, Board of Inspectors President Wieman, and Board of Inspections Vice President Browne. Id. at 1–2. Hughston claimed to have “verbally informed both Mr. McGee and Mr. … McCullough, 184 F.3d 236, 240 (3d Cir. 1999), which requires the Court to 4 In the SAC, Hughston renames as defendants Warden McGee, MCCF Board of Inspectors, BOI President Weiman, and BOI Vice President Browne.

Rumsey v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

276 F. Supp. 314 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 27, 1967

Defendant has moved for judgment n. o. v. … I do not understand plaintiff to argue that fresh lettuce turns brown and wilted in 15 minutes.

CARROLL v. MCCANN

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 2025

Kevin Madden and Erica Parham and Upper Darby Township Mayor Ed Brown are claims against Delaware County Jail Oversight Board and Upper Darby Township. … Hill Correctional Facility; The Geo Group, Inc.; Delaware County; Delaware County Jail Oversight Board and two board members, Kevin Madden and Erica Parham; Upper Darby Township and Mayor Ed Brown; Upper Darby Police Department

Michniewicz v. METASOURCE, LLC

756 F. Supp. 2d 657 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 19, 2010

Spagnoli v. Brown & Brown Metro, Inc., No. 06-414, 2007 WL 2362602 , at *11 (D.N.J. Aug. 15, 2007); see Atchison v. … Parker v. Verizon Pa., Inc., 309 Fed.Appx. 551, 555 (3d Cir.2009); see also Brown v. DB Sales, Inc., No. 04-1512, 2005 WL 3591533 , at *6 (E.D.Pa. Dec. 29, 2005) (Baylson, J.).

Bibby v. Philadelphia Coca Cola Bottling Co.

85 F. Supp. 2d 509 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 2000

Plaintiff alleges that, because Risell expedited proceedings before the safety board, the safety board heard the case in one week, whereas, according to plaintiff, it ordinarily required months. … In Swage v.

Food Drivers, Salesmen, Dairy & Ice Cream Workers, International Teamsters Union v. Schauffler

76 F. Supp. 1015 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1948

Sun Ship Employees Assn. v. National Labor Relations Board, 3 Cir., 139 F.2d 744 . … See United Employees Assn. v. National Labor Relations Board, 3 Cir., 96 F.2d 875, 876 .