Case law

United States v. Baker

754 F. Supp. 445 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 11, 1991

Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 739 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1541 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983). Officer Pirrone stopped the defendant’s automobile after he observed the defendant disregard a stop sign. … See Brown, 460 U.S. at 740 , 103 S.Ct. at 1542 ; United States v.

United States v. Joseph

510 F. Supp. 1001 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 2, 1981

See United States Railroad Retirement Board v. Fritz, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 453 , 66 L.Ed.2d 368 (1980), Andrus v. Allard, 444 U.S. 51, 56 , 100 S.Ct. 318, 322 , 62 L.Ed.2d 210 (1979), Southeastern Community College v. … United States v. Rone, 598 F.2d 564, 573 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied sub nom. Little v. Brown, 445 U.S. 946 , 100 S.Ct. 1345 , 63 L.Ed.2d 780 (1980), United States v.

Soto v. United States

369 F. Supp. 232 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 15, 1973

App.D.C. 32, 429 F.2d 711 (1970), which reaffirmed that circuit’s earlier view stated in Brown v. United States, supra, that notice of the right to appear pro se is not required. … The question had been left open in Brown v.

Murphy v. Radnor Township

904 F. Supp. 2d 498 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 6, 2012

Lauren W. v. DeFlaminis, 480 F.3d 259 , 272 (3d Cir.2007) (emphasis added); see also Sandstad v. … See Keller v. Orix Credit Alliance, Inc., 130 F.3d 1101, 1109 (3d Cir.1997) (citing Carson v.

Goussis v. Kimball

813 F. Supp. 352 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 18, 1993

Co. v. … Patel v. American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, Inc., No. 89-C-1751, 1989 WL 152816 (N.D.Ill.

Platt v. Brockenborough

476 F. Supp. 2d 467 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 2007

DirecTV v. Leto, 467 F.3d 842 , 844 n. 1 (3d Cir.2006). That is, the court must accept as true the well-pleaded allegations of the complaint and draw all reasonable inferences in the plaintiffs favor. Brown v. … Griffin v.

Newkirk v. Sheers

834 F. Supp. 772 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 1993

Malley v. Briggs, 475 U.S. 335, 345 , 106 S.Ct. 1092, 1098 , 89 L.Ed.2d 271 (1986); Schrob v. Catterson, 948 F.2d 1402, 1421 (3d Cir.1991); Brown v. Grabowski, 922 F.2d 1097, 1109 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, Roselle v. … The current Schuylkill County Prison Board consists of defendants: Shields, Holden, Kerns, and McCloskey. 19 . As explained in Wooden v.

Trinsey v. COM. OF PA., DEPT. OF STATE

766 F. Supp. 1338 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 1991

See Moore v. … In Nixon v. Herndon, Nixon v. Condon, Smith v. Allwright, and Terry v.

Driving Force, Inc. v. Manpower, Inc.

498 F. Supp. 21 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 1980

Carling Brewing Co. v. Philip Morris Inc., 297 F.Supp. 1330, 1337 (N.D.Ga.1968); accord, D. M. & Antique Import Corporation v. … A district court proceeding following a decision of the Trademark Trial and *26 Appeal Board is not a trial de novo, “in spite of the fact that some courts have loosely used this language.” Sarah Coventry, Inc. v.

Montante v. Wissahickon School District

399 F. Supp. 2d 615 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 3, 2005

The individual members of the School Board were dismissed as defendants by Memorandum and Order dated August 11, 2003. See Montanye v. Wissahickon School Disk, 2003 WL 22096122 (E.D.Pa. Aug.11, 2003). … The proceeding known as a “Loudermill hearing” was first utilized in the Supreme Court case of Cleveland Board of Education v.

Montanye v. Wissahickon School District

327 F. Supp. 2d 510 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 2004

Garrison v. Yeadon, 2003 WL 21282115 , *5 (E.D.Pa.2003); Development Group, LLC v. Franklin Township Board of Supervisors, 2003 WL 22358440 , *6 (E.D.Pa.2003); Reinsmith v. … and the School Board.

Lima v. Secretary of the United States Army

314 F. Supp. 337 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 1970

Ragoni v. United States, Secretary of the Navy, 424 F.2d 261 (3rd Cir. April 10, 1970); Sanford v. United States, 399 F.2d 693 (9th Cir. 1968). … to support the Board’s decision.

United States v. Kelly

336 F. Supp. 686 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 20, 1972

More importantly, the statute contemplates registration by personal appearance at the office of the Local Selective Service Board. Some departure from the norm may be acceptable. In United States v. … The government asserts that the duty to provide this information is owed only to recalcitrants who present themselves to the local board office. See United States v.

United States v. Forbes

25 F. Cas. 1141 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 1845

S. v. Haines [supra]. … S. v. Lynch [Case No. 15,648].

International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local Union 1332 v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n

940 F. Supp. 779 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 1996

See Mid-South Towing Co. v. … See United Mine Workers of Am., District No. 2 v.

Hykel v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance

317 F. Supp. 332 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 16, 1970

Justice Harlan joining the majority in a concurring opinion, the leading case of Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11, 393 U.S. 233, 234 , 89 S.Ct. 414 , 21 L.Ed.2d 402 (1968). … See e. g., Lockerty v. Phillips, 319 U.S. 182 , 63 S.Ct. 1019 , 87 L.Ed. 1339 (1943); Cary v. Curtis, 44 U.S. (3 How.) 236 , 11 L.Ed. 576 (1845); Turner v.

Bibby v. Philadelphia Coca Cola Bottling Co.

85 F. Supp. 2d 509 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 2000

Plaintiff alleges that, because Risell expedited proceedings before the safety board, the safety board heard the case in one week, whereas, according to plaintiff, it ordinarily required months. … In Swage v.

Moorehead v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF ALLENTOWN

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 2023

LEXIS 57112 at *6 (quoting Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405 (1997)). … Brown v. Montgomery County, No. 08-4259, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35811 at *8 (E.D. Pa.

Bolden v. Pennsylvania State Police

371 F. Supp. 1096 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1974

See, Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Connell v. … Dussia v. Barger, supra; Merlino v. Pennsylvania State Police Court Mar. Bd., 7 Pa. Cm with. 631, 301 A.2d 106 (1973) ; Penna. State Police v. Weichman, 86 Dauph. 323 (C.P., 1966).

Mushinsky v. Nelson, Watson & Assoc., LLC

642 F. Supp. 2d 470 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 13, 2009

. § 1692e; (g) Our Court of Appeals has held that the FDCPA is a remedial statute and that we should therefore “construe its language broadly,” Brown v. Card Svc. … In Hahn v.