Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspaed

10,000+ results

0.35s

  • Phx. Ins. Co. v. Teva Pharm. Indus. Ltd.

    381 F. Supp. 3d 416 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 22, 2019

    Order, Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board v. Teva Pharm. Indus. Ltd. , Civ. No. 17-558, Doc. No. 124 (D. Conn. July 11, 2017); Am. *419 Compl., Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board , Doc. No. 141 (D. Conn. … Compl., Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board , Doc. No. 226 with *422 Am. Compl. ¶ 1076-84, Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board , Doc. No. 141.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • In Re Sunrise Securities Litigation

    109 B.R. 658 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 8, 1990

    See Ray v. Turner, 587 F.2d 1187 , 1214 n. 56 (D.C.Cir.1978); Resident Advisory Board, 97 F.R.D. at 753 . See also Hinton v. Dept. of Justice, 844 F.2d 126, 128-29 (3d Cir. 1988). … Resident Advisory Board, 97 F.R.D. at 753 . See also Conoco v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, 687 F.2d 724, 728 (3d Cir. 1982); United States v. O’Neill, 619 F.2d 222, 226 (3d Cir.1980).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Maryland Coal & Coke Co. v. McGinnes

    225 F. Supp. 854 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1964

    Brown, Maryland’s president and one of Century’s principal stockholders. Brown’s refusal to go along with that offer resulted in Bethlehem’s increasing it to $1,500,000. … Brown then sought and obtained agreement from the other Century stockholders (Brown and two others were substantial stockholders in Century as well as stockholders and employees of Maryland) that the $200,000 increase in

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • The Lillian

    131 F. 375 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 1, 1904

    It is conceded that the libelant, by the terms of the articles of shipment, was to be on board January 21st; and it is further conceded that he complied with this part of the contract, and remained on board up until the 10th … C.) 15 Fed. 282 ; Boulton v. Moore (C. C.) 14 Fed. 922 . There is nothing in the case of The Bark Shetland et al. v. Johnson, 31 Wash. Law Rep. 411, cited by libelant, in conflict with this view.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. Trimble

    314 F. Supp. 186 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1970

    “United States v. Pence, 410 F.2d 557, 562 (CCA 8, 1969). … In. the recent case of Gutknecht v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Blake ex rel. Blake v. Kline

    462 F. Supp. 825 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 1978

    Harris v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 410 F.2d 1332 , 1333 n.1 (3d Cir. 1969). Nevertheless, as pointed out in Krisel v. … Urbano v. Board of Managers of New Jersey State Prison, 415 F.2d 247, 250-51 (3d Cir. 1969), citing Krisel, supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • PAAC v. Rizzo

    363 F. Supp. 503 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 16, 1973

    Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U.S. 561 , 32 S.Ct. 704 , 56 L.Ed. 1205 (1950). Plaintiffs’ right to sue must be founded directly upon a federal law. Gully v. … Association of Data Processing Service v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150 , 90 S.Ct. 827 , 25 L.Ed.2d 184 (1970); Barlow v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Marshall

    340 F. Supp. 117 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1972

    Czepil v. Tarr, 400 U.S. 849 , 91 S.Ct. 44 , 27 L.Ed.2d 87 ; United States v. Wallace, 435 F.2d 12 (9th Cir. 1970); United States v. Chaudron, 425 F.2d 605 (8th Cir. 1970); But see, United States v. … See, United States v. Williams, supra,, 317 F.Supp. at 1366-1367 ; United States v. Lemke, 310 F.Supp. 1298 (N. D.Cal.1969). However, United States v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Harold v. Barnhart

    450 F. Supp. 2d 544 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 17, 2006

    See Stone v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 179 F.3d 1368, 1375 (Fed.Cir.1999); cf. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) and Chabal v. … Brown v. Philip Morris, Inc., 250 F.3d 789, 800 (3d Cir.2001).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Bowser

    327 F. Supp. 755 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 7, 1971

    I must first decide whether knowledge of the statement given in the security interview should be imputed to the Local Board. In United States v. … See United States v. Turner, supra, at 1255 ; United States v. Bowen, 414 F.2d 1268, 1271-1272 (C.A.3, 1969); United States v. Moyer, supra, at 616 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Aljaf Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Federal Deposit Insurance

    879 F. Supp. 515 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 1995

    The District Court for the Northern District of Illinois considered a similar argument in Brown Leasing Co. v. FDIC, 833 F.Supp. 672 (N.D.Ill.1993), aff'd sub nom Brown Leasing Co. v. … See also Coleman v. FDIC, 826 F.Supp. 31 (D.Mass.1993). Aljaf cites dicta from Nants v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • United States v. Schwartz

    366 F. Supp. 443 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 1973

    See United States v. Wain, 162 F.2d 60 (2d Cir. 1947). … Bradley v. Laird, 449 F.2d 898 (10th Cir. 1971). See also Bruce v. United States, 448 F.2d 21 (4th Cir. 1971); Bruce v. United States, 458 F.2d 511 (4th Cir. 1972).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Radio Corp. of America v. Philco Corp.

    187 F. Supp. 940 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 1960

    In Smith v. … Judge Layton in Turchan v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Valentin v. Crozer-Chester Medical Center

    986 F. Supp. 292 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 3, 1997

    Board of Ed., 728 F.2d 160 , 162-63 (2d Cir.1984) (plaintiffs testimony not enough); Nekolny v. … Spence v. Board of Ed., 806 F.2d 1198, 1201 (3d Cir.1986); see Rush v. Scott Specialty Gases, Inc., 930 F.Supp. 194, 199 (E.D.Pa.1996), rev’d in part, 113 F.3d 476 (3d Cir.1997).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • McLaughlin v. Pernsley

    654 F. Supp. 1567 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 1987

    See generally Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond, 416 U.S. 696, 711-718 , 94 S.Ct. 2006, 2016-2019 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974). … See e.g., Brown v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Driving Force, Inc. v. Manpower, Inc.

    498 F. Supp. 21 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 1980

    Carling Brewing Co. v. Philip Morris Inc., 297 F.Supp. 1330, 1337 (N.D.Ga.1968); accord, D. M. & Antique Import Corporation v. … A district court proceeding following a decision of the Trademark Trial and *26 Appeal Board is not a trial de novo, “in spite of the fact that some courts have loosely used this language.” Sarah Coventry, Inc. v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Hirsch v. Corban Corp.

    968 F. Supp. 239 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 16, 1997

    In Phil Smidt & Son, Inc. v. … , and (2) *242 based on its argument that Eisenberg v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Evans v. Armour and Company

    241 F. Supp. 705 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 8, 1965

    Bird Coal & Iron Co. v. Humes, 157 Pa. 278, 288 , 27 A. 750, 752 (1893)see Bowman v. Gum, supra. … See Eagle v. Horvath, 241 F.Supp. 345 (S.D.N.Y.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Nath v. General Electric Co.

    438 F. Supp. 213 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1977

    State Electrical Board. … See Rogers v. International Paper Co., supra; Rowe v. General Motors Corporation, 457 F.2d 348 (5th Cir. 1972); Brown v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • United States v. Joseph

    510 F. Supp. 1001 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 2, 1981

    See United States Railroad Retirement Board v. Fritz, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 453 , 66 L.Ed.2d 368 (1980), Andrus v. Allard, 444 U.S. 51, 56 , 100 S.Ct. 318, 322 , 62 L.Ed.2d 210 (1979), Southeastern Community College v. … United States v. Rone, 598 F.2d 564, 573 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied sub nom. Little v. Brown, 445 U.S. 946 , 100 S.Ct. 1345 , 63 L.Ed.2d 780 (1980), United States v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.