Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspaed

10,000+ results

0.48s

  • Sampson v. School District of Lancaster

    262 F.R.D. 469 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 2008

    Waugh v. … Co. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Perez v. Philadelphia Housing Authority

    677 F. Supp. 357 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 1987

    Brown, 794 F.2d 931, 933 (4th Cir.1986); Strathie, 716 F.2d at 230 ; E.E. Black, Ltd. v. Marshall, 497 F.Supp. 1088, 1098 (D.Hawaii 1980). … School Board v. Arline, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 1123, 1127 , 94 L.Ed.2d 307 (1987) (quoting Alexander v. Choate, 469 U.S. 287 , 304 n. 24, 105 S.Ct. 712 , 722 n. 24, 83 L.Ed.2d 661 (1985)).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • United States v. Cunningham

    345 F. Supp. 37 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 14, 1972

    : Ehlert v. … United States v. Gearey, 368 F.2d 144, 149 (2d Cir.1966).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Mobilfone of Northeastern Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Commonwealth Telephone Co.

    428 F. Supp. 131 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 1977

    In Brenner v. … In Cantor v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re Jay Cooke & Co.

    19 F. 88 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 1883

    I do not recall any action of tlic board of trustees after I became a member of it, touching this matter, nor do I believe there was any.” … S. v. Buford, 3 Pet. 12 . J. K. Valentine, Dist. Atty., and Henry P. Brown, Asst. Dist. Atty., for the United States. L. W. Barringer and Reginald Fendall, for Garfield Memorial Hospital.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sovereign Order of Saint John of Jerusalem-Knights by Coleman v. Messineo

    572 F. Supp. 983 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 1983

    Oburn v. Shapp, 521 F.2d 142, 148 (3d Cir.1975). … In support of his position, plaintiff cites Chapin v. Benwood Foundation, Inc., 402 A.2d 1205 (Del.Ch.1979), aff’d sub nom. Harrison v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Samoff v. Local 107, Highway Truck Drivers & Helpers, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers

    224 F. Supp. 321 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 9, 1963

    , and the two so selected to choose a third member of said Board. … The decision of said Board is to be final and binding. “Section 16.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

    494 F. Supp. 481 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 1979

    Ferguson and Daniel Brown. Mr. Brown was in the first pay step of the ticket agent position in September, 1976, the month in which Mr. Ferguson was denied the ticket agent position. This Court finds that Mr. … Brown. Mr. Brown began as a ticket agent during September, 1976—the month Mr. Ferguson was first denied the position because of his inability to comply with the grooming regulation. At that time Mr.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pennsylvania R. R. System & Allied Lines Federation No. 90 v. Pennsylvania R.

    296 F. 220 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 5, 1924

    This question, so far as concerns this court, has been ruled against the plaintiffs in the case of Brotherhood of Clerks, etc., v. Railroad Co. (D. … The highest judicial authority (Pennsylvania v. Labor Board, 261 U. S. 72 , 43 Sup. Ct. 278, 67 L. Ed. 536 ) has found that the Labor Board may do this, and they have resolved .it in favor of the plaintiff.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bacon v. The Poconoket

    67 F. 262 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 1895

    Walker v. France, 112 Pa. St. 203, 5 Atl. 208 ; Cullmans v. Lindsay, 114 Pa. St 166 [ 6 Atl. 332 ]; Chapin v. Dobson, 78 N. Y. 75 ; Bank v. Fordyce, 9 Pa. St. 275; Chalfant v. Williams, 35 Pa. St. 212; Steamboat Co. v. … Brown, 54 Pa. St. 77; Chew v. Gillespie, 56 Pa. St. 308; Martin v. Berens, 67 Pa. St. 459; Graver v. Scott, 80 Pa. St. 88; Kostenbader v. Peters, Id. 438; Driesbach v. Bridge Co., *81 Pa. St. 177; Whitney v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States Ex Rel. Kloiber v. Myers

    237 F. Supp. 682 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 1965

    Kloiber v. … See Howard v. United States, 274 F.2d 100, 102 (8th Cir. 1960) cert. denied 363 U.S. 832 , 80 S.Ct. 1604 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1525 (1960); Woods v. Steiner, 207 F.Supp. 945 (D.Md.1962); Van Buskirk v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Kaufman Ex Rel. Morlan International, Inc. v. Safeguard Scientifics, Inc.

    587 F. Supp. 486 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1984

    Lewis v. Graves, 701 F.2d 245, 248 (2d Cir.1983); Lewis v. Curtis, 671 F.2d 779, 784-785 (3d Cir.1982). Mr. Kaufman contends that a demand upon the Morían directors would have proved futile for several reasons. Mr. … In the event the board decides not to sue, a district court faced with a shareholder derivative suit must decide whether to defer to the board’s judgment not to sue and dismiss the case. Weiss v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Barndt v. Wissahickon School District

    475 F. Supp. 503 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 13, 1979

    Barndt v. Board of School Directors, 28 Pa.Cmwlth. 482 , 368 A.2d 1355 (Cmwlth.Ct. 1977). … Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83, 102 , 88 S.Ct. 1942 , 20 L.Ed.2d 947 (1968).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Fields v. City of Philadelphia

    166 F. Supp. 3d 528 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 19, 2016

    She adduced the officers’ admission they witnessed Officer Brown’s conduct toward her. 81 We cannot make factual findings as to whether these officers knew of the extent of Officer Brown’s conduct towards Geraci and had a … Officer Brown concedes there are disputed facts on this claim which must be resolved by a jury, and does not move for summary judgment on this claim. . Estate of Smith v. Marasco, 318 F.3d 497, 515 (3d Cir.2003). .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Antonioli v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.

    47 F.R.D. 198 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 1969

    The earlier decisions on the plaintiff’s claim require him to seek relief before the National Railroad Adjustment Board. Roberts v. Lehigh & N. E. Ry., 323 F.2d 219 (1963); Clemens v. Central R. … the power of decision. * * * ” Brotherhood of Locomotive Eng. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Esposito v. Emery

    249 F. Supp. 308 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1965

    In Hess v. … Cianii v. Board of Education of City School District of City of Rye, 18 A.D. 2d 930 , 238 N.Y.S.2d 547 (1963).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • PELOTON COLD BREW, LLC v. PELOTON INTERACTIVE, INC.

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 2, 2022

    Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011). Defendant is correct that this court does not have general jurisdiction over it. … Marten v. Godwin, 499 F.3d 290, 296 (3d Cir. 2007). Plaintiff seeks review of the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board which cancelled plaintiff’s trademark.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In re Philadelphia Entertainment & Development Partners, LP

    569 B.R. 394 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 2017

    V. … Mining & Mineral Co. v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Philadelphia Entertainment & Development Partners, LP v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Revenue, 879 F.3d 492 (2018)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • BP Environmental Services, Inc. v. Republic Services, Inc.

    946 F. Supp. 2d 402 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 21, 2013

    See Phillips v. … First, as to the nature of Republic’s conduct, Republic acted above-board.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Rekant v. SHOCHTAY-GASOS UNION, LOCAL 446, ETC.

    205 F. Supp. 284 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 22, 1962

    Detroy v. … Garner v. Teamsters Union, 346 U.S. 485 , 74 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed. 228 (1953); International Association of Machinists v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Herman Rekant v. Shochtay-Gasos Union Local 446 of the Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America, 320 F.2d 271 (1963)Cited 15 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.