Case law

Schwartz v. Kursman (In Re Harry Levin, Inc.)

175 B.R. 560 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 5, 1994

See Brown v. Peoples Sec. … Brown v. Marquette Savings & Loan Association, 686 F.2d 608, 615 (7th Cir.1982) (citing 2A C. Sands, Sutherland Statutory Construction § 49.11, at 265-66 (4th ed. 1973)); cf. Anderson Bros. Ford v.

In Re MK Lombard Group I, Ltd.

301 B.R. 812 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 2003

(In re Enjet, Inc.), 220 B.R. 312, 314 (E.D.La.1998) (noting that “numerous courts have applied Rule 7015 and Rule 15(c) explicitly or by analogy in non-adversary [bankruptcy] proceedings”); In re Brown, 159 B.R. 710, 714 … Co. v. Brunswick Associates L.P., 507 U.S. 380 , 113 S.Ct. 1489 , 123 L.Ed.2d 74 (1993).

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Ex Rel. Estate of Labrum & Doak v. Bechtle (In Re Labrum & Doak, LLP)

237 B.R. 275 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 3, 1999

White v. Brown, 292 F.2d 725, 727 (D.C.Cir.1961), citing Dunbar v. Steiert, 31 Ariz. 403 , 253 P. 1113 (1927); International Harvester Co. of America v. Layton, 148 Ark. 156 , 229 S.W. 22 (1921); LeGault v. … See, e.g., Board of Trustees v. Centra, 983 F.2d 495 , 504 (3rd Cir.1992); Napier v. Thirty or More Unidentified Federal Agents, 855 F.2d 1080 , 1086 (3rd Cir.1988) Williams v.

Plymouth Plaza Office Building Associates v. American Real Estate Associates, Inc. (In Re Plymouth Plaza Office Building Associates)

16 B.R. 113 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 1981

What is more, although Berg testified that he had been authorized by the chairman of the board of directors of the debtor’s general partner to replace the carpet in the common hallway, no other evidence was offered to corroborate … See also, McDaniel National Bank v. Bridwel, 74 F.2d 331 (8th Cir. 1934); Ansfield v.

Great Point Intermodal, LLC v. Norfolk Southern Corp. (In Re Great Point Intermodal, LLC)

334 B.R. 359 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 2, 2005

Reynolds v. Ellingsworth, 23 F.3d 756, 763 (3d Cir.1994). Here, there is no indication that the Plaintiff knowingly abandoned any interest claim. … See Sacred Heart Hosp. of Norristown v. E.B. O'Reilly Serv’g Corp.

Crippen v. Stites (In Re Crippen)

346 B.R. 115 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 25, 2006

See e.g., Gal v. … Martin v. Brown, 63 F.3d 1252 , 1264 (3d Cir.1995). An attorney is entitled to make reasonable inferences from the available facts. 10 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 9011.04[2][a] (Matthew Bender 15th ed. Revised 2006).

In Re Tashjian

72 B.R. 968 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 5, 1987

Those cases and the facts from each that we deem relevant, are as follows: Ukranian Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Trident Corp., 22 B.R. 491 (E.D. … See In re Sudler, Sudler v. Chester Housing Authority, 71 B.R. 780, 786-87 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1987). 5 .

Harewood v. Sarah Allen Home for the Aged, Inc. (In Re Sarah Allen Home for the Aged, Inc.)

4 B.R. 724 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1980

No. 80-0151G; Murray v. Beneficial Financial System, Adv. No. 80-0231G; Murray v. Credit Thrift of America, Adv. No. 80-0232G; Ade v. American Finance Corp., Adv. No. 79-0038G; Capizzi v. … No. 80-0271G; Blair v. Ritter Consumer Discount Co., Adv. No. 80-0289G; Blair v. Household Finance Corp., Adv. No. 80-0290G; Blair v. Beneficial Finance Systems, Adv. No. 80-0291G. 2 .

Kranzdorf v. Alter (In re Fidelity America Financial Corp.)

63 B.R. 995 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 1986

Duke v. Texas, 477 F.2d 244 , reh. den., 478 F.2d 1402 (5th Cir.1973); Lamb Enterprises, Inc. v. Kiroff, 549 F.2d 1052 (6th Cir.1977). … Whatever power remains reposed in the debtor’s president and board of directors, is inferior to that of the bankruptcy trustee. It is through the authority of the trustee that the debtor acts.

Dechert Price & Rhoads v. Direct Satellite Communications, Inc. (In re Direct Satellite Communications, Inc.)

86 B.R. 390 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 29, 1988

Marks, Esquire (hereinafter referred to as “Marks”), as a result of the failure of Marks to make the Debt- or’s other Board members aware of alleged irregularities by the former President of the Debtor, Errett L. … See, e.g., Nottingham v. General American Communications Corp., 811 F.2d 873, 880 (5th Cir.1987); Burkett v. Western Maryland Ry., 595 F.Supp. 1058, 1062 (M.D.Pa.1984); and Micheel v.

In Re Mu'min

374 B.R. 149 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 2007

See, e.g., Northampton County Area Community College v. Dow Chemical, U.S.A, 528 Pa. 502 , 598 A.2d 1288, 1294 (1991); Com. ex rel. Brown v. Weidner, 208 Pa.Super. 114 , 220 A.2d 382, 385 (1966); Pass v. … In re Brown, 311 B.R. 409, 412-13 (E.D.Pa.2004) (emphasis added). .

King's Place, Inc. v. First National Bank of Strasburg (In Re King's Place, Inc.)

6 B.R. 305 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 1980

Co. v. Simon, 22 F.R.D. 186, 187 (E.D. Pa.1958). … Co. v. Rosen, 69 F.R.D. 83, 83 (E.D.

In re Forever Green Athletic Fields, Inc.

500 B.R. 413 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 1, 2013

McCurdy v. American Board of Plastic Surgery, 157 F.3d 191, 194-95 (3d Cir.1998) (holding "that a defense that service of process was untimely under Rule 4(m) is subject to Rule 12’s waiver provisions”). . Mr. … Dismantlement Corp., Inc. v. Brown Assoc., Inc., Civ. No. 97-1309, 2000 WL 433971 , *4 (E.D.Pa.

Payne v. Lampe (In Re Lampe)

444 B.R. 140 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 19, 2010

Sternlicht v. … See Jones v. The Money Store, Inc.

Van Huderson v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (In Re Van Huderson)

96 B.R. 541 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 16, 1989

However, application of this standard is tempered by the observation that the assignment program “is the product of litigation which began in 1973 over HUD’s failure to adequately supervise mortgagees in Chicago, Brown v. … See Ferrell v. Hills (the same case as Brown v. Lynn), Civ. No. 730334 (N.D.Ill. Feb. 13,1973).

Norfolk and Western Railroad v. Bergman (In Re Bergman)

103 B.R. 660 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 1989

In Brown v. … See, e.g., Poulis v.

In Re Express Car & Truck Rental, Inc.

455 B.R. 434 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 22, 2011

See, e.g., Smith v. Evans, 853 F.2d 155, 158 (3d Cir.1988); accord Servants of the Paraclete v. Does, 204 F.3d 1005, 1012 (10th Cir.2000); Van Skiver v. … Brown v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 282 F.2d 522, 527 (3d Cir.1960). Additionally, the party’s misconduct must have prevented the moving party from "fully and fairly presenting its defense,” Bethel v.

In re Cohen-Harvin

571 B.R. 672 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 7, 2017

The starting point in analyzing the parties’ dispute is Lance v. … See EMC Mortg., LLC v. Biddle, 114 A.3d 1057 , 1072 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015) (factual disputes mandate an evidentiary hearing on a motion to reassess damages); see also Union Nat. Bank of Pittsburgh v.

In Re Pellegrino

205 B.R. 479 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 27, 1997

Genesis Leasing Co. v. Minchoff, 315 Pa.Super. 437, 443 , 462 A.2d 274, 277 (1983). See also M.M. Waterbor, Inc. v. Livingood, 179 Pa.Super. 610, 614-16 , 117 A.2d 790, 792 (1955). … Compare Smith v. Gold, 4 D. & C.2d 745 (Philadelphia, Co. C.P.1957); and Daley Mack Sales, Inc. v. Klink, 26 D. & C.3d 341 (Somerset Co.

In Re Mayflower Associates

78 B.R. 41 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 22, 1987

Frankly, we consider a case wherein 59 percent of the time is spent conferencing among clients and counsel to present a situation where, unless extremely detailed and convincing explanations are presented, *47 an across-the-board … Prandini v. National Tea Co., 585 F.2d 47, 52 (3d Cir.1978).” Both Daggett and Prandini , however, address circumstances where the trial court made an across-the-board percentage cut of the lodestar.