Case law

Madera v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co. (In Re Madera)

363 B.R. 718 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 8, 2007

In 15 U.S.C. § 1604 , Congress authorized the Federal Reserve Board to “prescribe regulations to carry out the purposes” of TILA. … Pursuant to this authority, the Federal Reserve Board promulgated “Regulation Z,” which is memorialized in 12 C.F.R. § 226 . Rossman v. Fleet Bank (R.I.) National As sociation, 280 F.3d 384, 389 (3d Cir.2002).

Northrup v. Ben Thompson Enterprises (In Re Northrup)

220 B.R. 855 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 1998

Moreover, in Welded Tube Co. of America v. … See Brown, supra, 219 B.R. at 383; Witmer v. Exxon Corp., 495 Pa. 540, 551-52 , 434 A.2d 1222, 1228 (1981); and Germantown Manufacturing Co. v. Rawlin- *862 son, 341 Pa.Super. 42, 55-60 , 491 A.2d 138, 145-48 (1985).

In Re J.M v. Inc.

90 B.R. 737 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 1988

Did you ever take part in any corporate board meetings of J.M.V., Inc.? Q. Did you ever take part in any corporate shareholder meetings of J.M.V., Incorporated? Q. … and “did you ever take part in any corporate board meetings?” and the crimes of mail, wire or bank fraud and/or concealment of assets from the trustee.

Sterten v. Option One Mortgage Corp. (In Re Sterten)

352 B.R. 380 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 2006

Celona v. … The Federal Reserve Board regulations are set forth in Regulation Z. See 12 C.F.R. §§ 226.1 et seq. The Federal Reserve Board's regulations are entitled to deference by the courts. See Anderson Brothers Ford v.

In Re Bozzelli

227 B.R. 770 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1998

Inc. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, 702 A.2d 873, 875 (Pa.Cmwlth.1997). In this case, it is undisputed that the value of the Debtors’ property has never been litigated. … Beard v.

Whitt v. Philadelphia Housing Authority (In Re Whitt)

79 B.R. 611 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1987

In October, 1976, the Debtor presented a breach of warranty complaint to arbitration pursuant to a grievance procedure established by Consent Decree in Brown v. Philadelphia Housing Authority, C.A. … See also Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v.

Blakey v. Pierce (In Re Blakey)

78 B.R. 435 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 1987

holding that § 506(a) applies to reduce the secured status of residential mortgagees despite the presence of § 1322(b)(2), of which our Opinion of July 24, 1987, in this case was an example, see also, In re Caster; Caster v. … See In re Bonanno, 78 B.R. 52, 56-57 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1987); and In re Brown, 76 B.R. 1013, 1015 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1987).

In Re Gillespie

113 A.L.R. Fed. 705 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 14, 1990

See, e.g., Brown v. Marquette Savings & Loan Ass’n, 686 F.2d 608, 615-16 (7th Cir.1982); Aquino v. Public Finance Consumer Discount Co., 606 F.Supp. 504, 510-11 (E.D.Pa.1985); and Dennis v. … See United States v. Adams, 634 F.2d 1261, 1265 (10th Cir.1980); Thomas v. Pierce, 662 F.Supp. 519, 525-28 (D.Kan.1987); and Armor Elevator Co. v.

In Re Unbreakable Nation Co.

437 B.R. 189 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 19, 2010

Co. v. … As discussed above, the board independently approved the Licensing Agreements. 23 .

Apgar v. Homeside Lending, Inc. (In Re Apgar)

291 B.R. 665 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 8, 2003

See United States v. Premises Known as 717 South Woodward Street, 2 F.3d 529, 533 (3rd Cir.1993); J.F. Feeser, Inc. v. … See Ford Motor Credit Co. v.

Eisenberg v. Pennsylvania State University (In re Lewis)

574 B.R. 536 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 7, 2017

Finkel v. Polichuk (In re Polichuk), 506 B.R. 405, 435 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2014) (quoting In re Consolidated Pioneer Mtge. Entities, 211 B.R. 704, 717 (S.D. Cal. 1997)); see also Daly v. … If, on the other hand, he avoids an obligation, the obligation is rendered unenforceable, there is nothing to return, and § 550 affords no remedy.”); Brown v. GE Capital (In re Foxmeyer Corp.), 290 B.R. 229, 234 (Bankr.

Tucker v. Mid-Penn Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Tucker)

74 B.R. 923 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 18, 1987

First, per the rule established in Gennuso v. … See, e.g., Aquino v. Public Finance Consumer Discount Co., 606 F.Supp. 504, 509-11 (E.D.Pa.1985); Bookhart, supra, 559 F.Supp. at 212 ; Reid v.

In Re Norton

15 B.R. 623 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 1981

In Goldstein v. Jefferson T. & T. … Fidelity Mortgage Investors v.

Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare v. Johnson-Allen (In Re Johnson-Allen)

69 B.R. 461 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 1987

In Kelly v. … The question is whether the Court’s dictum in Kelly v.

In Re West Pine Construction Co.

80 B.R. 315 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 9, 1987

Brennan v. D.J. McNichol Co., 439 F.Supp. 499, 503 , citing Captiol Bus Co. v. … Douglas Colkitt, chief executive officer and shareholder of debtor, the new board was never created. N.T. July 28, 1986, p. 69.

Brooks Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. Metropolitan Edison Co. (In Re Naudain, Inc.)

32 B.R. 871 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 1983

See also In re Brown, 20 B.R. 554 (Bkrtcy.S.D.N.Y.1982); In re Ray W. Dickey & Sons, Inc., 11 B.R. 146 (Bkrtcy.N.D.Tex.1980). … See Naudaln, Inc. v. Schaad Detective Agency, 32 B.R. 875 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Pa.1983) citing Matter of Advance Glove Mfg. Co., 25 B.R. 521 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Mich., S.D. 1982).

Murray v. First National Bank of Chicago (In Re Murray)

239 B.R. 728 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 1999

The Debtor posits that these circumstances entitle him to $9,800 in actual damages and $10,000 in punitive damages due to the violations under ECOA, *733 citing Newton v. … See Brown, supra, 134 B.R. at 146 (accepting this reasoning where the state law claims and the TILA claims “overlap”). But cf. In re Milbourne, 108 B.R. 522, 530-33 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1989).

In Re Temple Zion

125 B.R. 910 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1991

All applications must be approved by the Abington Township Planning Committee, the Montgomery County Planning Committee, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources, the Zoning Board and the Board of Commissioners … Gross v. Bush Terminal Co., 105 F.2d 930 (2nd Cir. 1939); Central States Life Ins. Co. v. The Koplar Co., 85 F.2d 181 (8th Cir.1936).

In Re Spring Meadow Trout Hatchery, Inc.

29 B.R. 615 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 27, 1983

Diehl were involved in a state court lawsuit regarding the trout hatchery with the Zoning Hearing Board of Lower Milford Township, which had also begun many months prior to the bankruptcy filings. … Wright v. Sterling Land Co., 157 Pa.Super. 625, 626 , 43 A.2d 614, 615 (1945).”

Beard Research, Inc. v. Kates (In re Kates)

485 B.R. 86 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 2012

Betts v. Townsends, Inc., 765 A.2d 531, 535 (Del.2000) (citation omitted); accord M.G. Bancorporation v. Le Beau, 737 A.2d 513, 520 (Del.1999); Tyndall v. Tyndall, 238 A.2d 343, 346 (Del.1968); see also Messick v. … But see Muegler v.