Case law

In re World Imports, Ltd.

511 B.R. 738 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 18, 2014

Corp. v. … According to the Incoterms®2010, 7 the term Free on Board [m]eans that the seller delivers the goods on board the vessel nominated by the buyer at the named port of shipment or procures the goods already so delivered.

Michener v. Brady (In Re Brady)

234 B.R. 652 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 14, 1999

BY SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT, CLAIMANT IS TURNING OVER TO THE PENNSYLVANIA LAWYERS FUND FOR CLIENT SECURITY BOARD WHATEVER RIGHTS AND CLAIMS MAY EXIST AGAINST THE ATTORNEY OR AGAINST ANY OTHER PARTY, SO THAT THE BOARD MAY PROCEED … See e.g., Yohe v. Yohe, 466 Pa. 405, 411 , 353 A.2d 417, 420 (1976); Gray [v. Leibert,], supra, 357 Pa. [130,] at 135, 53 A.2d [132,] at 135 [ (1947) ]; and Gee v.

Vision W., Inc. v. Catalan (In re Catalan)

590 B.R. 678 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 2018

Brown v. Felsen , 442 U.S. 127 , 138, 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979). The Supreme Court applied this principle to look past the form of a stipulated judgment in Brown and a settlement agreement in Archer . … Vision West does not rely on a novation theory, the likes of which failed in Archer and Brown .

Ammons v. Edwards (In Re Edwards)

212 B.R. 245 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 29, 1997

Boyce v. … Willison v.

Anderson Associates, Inc. v. Butcher Boy Meat Market, Inc. (In re Butcher Boy Meat Market, Inc.)

1 B.R. 155 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 1979

Clarke v. Burkle, 570 F.2d 824 (8th Cir. 1978); Bershad v. McDonough, 469 F.2d 1333 (7th Cir. 1972); Hoffman v. Celebrezze, 405 F.3d 833 (8th Cir. 1969); Greenspahn v. Joseph E. … Ackermann v. United States, 340 U.S. 193 , 71 S.Ct. 209 , 95 L.Ed. 207 (1950); Brown v.

Stuart v. Decision One Mortgage Co., LLC (In Re Stuart)

367 B.R. 541 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 6, 2007

See Taliaferro v. Darby Township Zoning Board, 458 F.3d 181, 192-193 (3d Cir.2006). … Oct. 27, 2006) (not precedential); Barnes v. Domitrovich, 2006 WL 1602545 , at * 1 (3d Cir. June 7, 2006) (not precedential); Kepoint Preservation Trust Org. ex rel. Brown v. Fisher, 2006 WL 861216 , at *1 (3d Cir.

In Re Tube Methods, Inc.

73 B.R. 974 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 29, 1987

In making this argument, the claimants fail to consider the “elementary principle of corporation law that the declaration of dividends out of net profits rests in the discretion of the board of directors.” Knapp v. … Jones v. Costlow, 349 Pa. 136 , 36 A.2d 460, 463-64 (1944). Judicial review of the exercise of a board of directors’ decision regarding the issuance of dividends is subject to the business judgment rule. See Kroese v.

Garafano v. Trustees of the Amalgamated Insurance Fund (In Re Garafano)

99 B.R. 624 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 5, 1989

Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 181 , 99 S.Ct. 2205, 2209 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979); Jaffe v. Grant, 793 F.2d 1182, 1188 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1566 , 94 L.Ed. 2d 759 (1987); and Kapp v. … In Browning v.

In Re Eagson Corp.

1 B.R. 777 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 1980

See, e. g., Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265 , 81 S.Ct. 534 , 5 L.Ed.2d 551 (1961); Gruca v. United States Steel Corp., 495 F.2d 1252 (3d Cir. 1974); Burke v. … Gateway Clipper, Inc., 441 F.2d 946 (3d Cir. 1971); Sobosle v. United States Steel Corp., 359 F.2d 7 (3d Cir. 1966). 7 . Burke v. Gateway Clipper, Inc., 441 F.2d 946, 949 (3d Cir. 1971). 8 . N.T. at 24 and 27-32. 9 .

Brendern Enterprises, Inc. v. Micro-Acoustics Corp. (In Re Brendern Enterprises, Inc.)

12 B.R. 458 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 1981

Sturr, 128 F.Supp. 188 (S.D.N.Y.1938); Western Tie & Timber Co. v. Brown, 196 U.S. 502 , 25 S.Ct. 339 , 49 L.Ed. 571 (1905); Libby v. … See Sparrow v. Airport Parking Company of America, 221 Pa.Super. 32, 33 , 289 A.2d 87 (1972); Lion Yard Co. v.

U.I.U. Health & Welfare Fund Ex Rel. Serembus v. Levit (In Re Futura Industries, Inc.)

69 B.R. 831 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 1987

See In re Osage Exploration Co., 39 B.R. 966 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1984) 6 My conclusion comports with the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Franchise Tax Board v. … See Franchise Tax Board v. Laborers Vacation Trust. In other words, in the instant proceeding, absent Futura’s bankruptcy filing, this state court lawsuit could not have been removed to federal court.

Lewis v. Delta Funding Corp. (In Re Lewis)

290 B.R. 541 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 2003

In Smith v. … Part 226 (1979) was promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board to implement the TILA. See Smith v.

In Re Desiderio

209 B.R. 342 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 1997

Wausau first argues that extensions should be “liberally granted,” citing Brown v. … See Brown, supra, 160 B.R. at 785-86 ; Aucoin, supra, 150 B.R. at 648 ; James, supra, 187 B.R. at 398 ; Sturgis, supra, 46 B.R. at 364-65 ; and Kellogg, supra, 41 B.R. at 838.

Sheppard v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. (In Re Sheppard)

299 B.R. 753 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 2003

Pursuant to this authority, the Federal Reserve Board promulgated “Regulation Z” which is memorialized in 12 C.F.R. Pt. 226. Rossman v. Fleet Bank (R.I.) National Association, 280 F.3d 384, 389 (3d Cir.2002). … The Board “also published extensive ‘Official Staff Interpretations.’ 12 C.F.R. Pt. 226 Supp. I.” Id. As the Third Circuit noted in Ortiz v.

Santos v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (In Re Santos)

97 B.R. 227 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1989

Brown v. Lynn. … See also Brown v.

In re Traversa

585 B.R. 215 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 2018

Pa. 2015) ; see also *222 Church v. Accretive Health, Inc. , 2014 WL 7184340 (S.D. Ala. Dec. 16, 2014) ; In re Brown , 481 B.R. 351 , 357 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 2012). … See Brown v.

Pinder v. Lomas & Nettleton Co. (In Re Pinder)

83 B.R. 905 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1988

Steel Homes Credit v. … Sellers v. Wollman, 510 F.2d 119, 122 (5th Cir.1975); Allen v.

Soto v. PNC Bank (In Re Soto)

221 B.R. 343 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 1998

C.D.G., Inc. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, 702 A.2d 873 , 876 n. 5 (Pa.Cmwlth.1997). … See Pennsylvania State Troopers’ Association v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 671 A.2d 1183, 1187 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996), appeal denied, 545 Pa. 657 , 680 A.2d 1164 (1996); Flynn v.

In Re Elcom Technologies Corp.

339 B.R. 354 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 2006

Brentwood Medical Associates v. United Mine Workers of America, 396 F.3d 237, 241 (3d Cir.2005). Judicial review of an arbitration award is extremely narrow and severely limited. Jeffrey Brown Associates, Inc. v. … Cone Mem’l Hosp. v. Mercury Constr. Corp., 460 U.S. 1, 24 , 103 S.Ct. 927, 941 , 74 L.Ed.2d 765 (1983); Coley v. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp., 428 F.3d 1359, 1367 (11th Cir.2005); Hill v.

In Re Glunk

342 B.R. 717 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 2006

See generally Green v. … See In re Brown, 951 F.2d 564, 570 (3d Cir.1991). 39 *743 V. CONCLUSION For the reasons explained above, I will deny Mr. and Mrs.