Case law

Forman v. Pennsylvania College of Podiatric Medicine

56 Pa. D. & C.2d 645 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 20, 1972

In Mustell v. … In Militana v. University of Miami, 236 So. 2d 162 (Fla.

SKF Employees Ass'n v. Root

57 Pa. D. & C. 12 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 14, 1946

In Downing v. … The court in further commenting on the right to bring suit for threatened wrongdoing stated at page 545: “There can be no question of jurisdiction in this case: see Williams v. District Executive Board, U. M.

Real Estate-Land Title & Trust Co. v. Butler

11 Pa. D. & C. 178 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 24, 1928

Brown, Jr., J., This is an action by the Real Estate-Land Title and Trust Company, endorsee of a check in the amount of $20,502, against the makers, J. Russell Butler, Alexander J. McConnell, Charles A. Zubrod and W. J. … Therefore, defendants’ motion for judgment n. o. v. is dismissed.

Williams v. SEPTA

4 Pa. D. & C.4th 363 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 12, 1989

Clearview Bowling Center Inc. v. Hanover Borough, York County, 430 Pa. 579 , 244 A.2d 20 (1968); Manoa Shopping Center Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Haverford Twp., 11 Pa. Commw. 569 , 314 A.2d 516 (1974). … The act was intended to reinstate the governmental immunity, abolished in Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public Education, 453 Pa. 584 , 305 A.2d 877 (1973).

Dearlove v. Genzyme Transgenics Corp.

58 Pa. D. & C.4th 517 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 19, 2002

Jones v. Borden Inc., 455 Pa. Super. 110, 114 , 687 A.2d 392, *523 394 (1996), citing Shears v. Rigley, 424 Pa. … Bullock (member of the board of GTC and voting member of its compensation committee), John B.

In re Central Trust & Savings Co.

41 Pa. D. & C. 304 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 12, 1941

the property to be sold and the price to be paid therefor, and where the court authorizes the sale and conveyance of the given piece of real estate to the named purchaser at the specified price, the sale is final: Files v. … Brown, 124 Fed. 133 (1903), where the court said (p. 137) : “The reason of the old rule in chancery that sales made by a master under an order or decree of court are not final unless confirmed is that the court is the vendor

Feagles v. Sullivan

32 Pa. D. & C. 47 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 28, 1938

Brown, Jr., J., Plaintiff sued to recover for personal injuries sustained in a collision between her automobile, which she was driving, and an automobile allegedly being driven for the benefit of defendant and under defendant … Thus, in McMahen v.

Connelly v. Weber

22 Pa. D. & C.2d 454 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 18, 1959

In LaCourse v. … Making this statement without having examined the premises appears to us to amount to the recklessness referred to in Warren Balderston Co. v. Integrity Trust Co., 314 Pa. 58 (1934), and Polaski v. Levin, 176 Pa.

Edmonds v. Donald

40 Pa. D. & C.3d 220 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 10, 1984

See Roberts v. Board of Directors of School District of Scranton, 426 Pa. 464 , 341 A.2d 475 (1975). All three of these requirements must be met before an injunction will be granted. … Peitzman v. Seidman, 285 Pa. Super. 228 , 427 A.2d 196 (1981).

Weber v. Colonial Trust Co.

6 Pa. D. & C. 699 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 1, 1925

In Jones v. Stearns, 122 Atl. Repr. … See, also, Edwards v.

Knoell v. Carey

9 Pa. D. & C. 47 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 29, 1927

See Drake v. Stout, 282 Pa. 223 . The Sheriff then made distribution of the fund in his hands and paid Harry Drake the balance of his mechanic’s claim. … In the case of Dowd v. Crow, 205 Pa. 214, 218 , Mr. Justice Brown, in discussing a case somewhat similar to the one before us, stated the law as follows : “. . .

Chambers v. Chambers

35 Pa. D. & C. 212 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 30, 1939

Superior Ct. 328 (1905), Barning v. Barning, 46 Pa. Superior Ct. 291 (1911), Jackson v. Jackson 49 Pa. Superior Ct. 18 (1912), Clayton v. Clayton, 1 Ashm. 52 (1823), Toone v. Toone, 10 Phila. 174 (1874), Clayburgh v. … D. 1939, to answer this libel and complaint; and also that a decree may be made by your Honorable Court, granting this libellant a divorce from bed and board, and also allow such alimony as the said respondent’s circumstances

Knoell v. Carey

9 Pa. D. & C. 381 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 29, 1927

In the case of Dowd v. Crow, 205 Pa. 214, 218 , Mr. Justice Brown, in discussing a case somewhat similar to the one before us, stated the law as follows: “. . . … Stout, supra, as well as the case of Knoell, Appellant, v. Carey, Sheriff, 285 Pa. 498 . This, we hold, the trial judge could not have done.

Forman Building & Loan Ass'n v. Prager

19 Pa. D. & C. 391 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Sep 15, 1933

Brown, Jr., J., December 21,1925, defendants executed a collateral bond in plaintiff’s favor in the amount of $3,000 conditioned for the payment of dues, interest, and taxes as set forth in bonds and mortgages given to plaintiff … Although Culbertson, Receiver, v.

Watkins v. Hill

1 Pa. D. & C.4th 59 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 21, 1988

Cianfrani v. Commonwealth, State Retirement Board, 505 Pa. 294 , 479 A.2d 468 (1984). If any theory of law will support the claim raised by the complaint, dismissal is improper. Alumni Assn. v. Sullivan, 369 Pa. … Ambacher v. Penrose and City of Philadelphia, 92 Pa.

Burch v. Mellor

43 Pa. D. & C. 597 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 11, 1942

His first concern was to have a handsome sign-board, with a proper inscription. … Co., 54 Pa. 401 ; Ashinsky v. Levenson, 256 Pa. 14 ; Kershes v. Verbicus et al., 36 D. & C. 499, 504; Miner et al. v. *604 Loomis et al., 25 D. & C. 275; Bispham’s Principles of Equity, (10th ed.) chap. III, p. 58.

Commonwealth v. Gross

9 Pa. D. & C.2d 565 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 24, 1956

Brown, P. … before the secretary, and his action thereon, but to hear evidence and determine, in the exercise of the court’s sound discretion and in the furtherance of justice, whether the license should be suspended”: Commonwealth v.

Durand v. Halbach

1 Miles 46 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Sep 14, 1835

In the case of Hill v. … Day v. Hamburgh, 1 Browne's Rep. 75. That the very matter of fact suggested here is proper to be inquired into upon such a writ, has been determined in the case of Davis v. Packard, 8 Peters’s Rep. 312.

Byrd v. Sacco

1 Pa. D. & C.5th 319 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 30, 2006

(2) Should the trial court grant defendant’s motion for a new trial because the defendant’s statement to the Police Advisory Board was done under conditionally privileged circumstances? … Harsh v. Petroll, 840 A.2d 404, 432 (Pa. Commw. 2003), citing Commonwealth v. Brown, 544 Pa. 406 , 676 A.2d 1178 (1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1043 (1996).

Cohen v. Seidman

63 Pa. D. & C. 271 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 3, 1948

The nearest case upon the facts that we can find is that of Reid v. Brown, 24 N. J. Misc. 350, 49 A. (2d) 311 (1946). … They are Preacher v. Carlson in the Municipal Court of Los Angeles, California, decided September 6th, 1946, and Gruszka v. Koshuba in the Wisconsin Circuit Court, Milwaukee County Branch No. 7, March 20th, 1945.