Case law

Brodie v. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

70 Pa. D. & C.4th 240 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 20, 2005

Ridge v. State Employees’Retirement Board, 690 A.2d 1312 , 1314 n.5 (Pa. Commw. 1997). (citations omitted) B. … The union also filed an unfair labor practice complaint with the National Labor Relations Board.

Subbiondo v. Temple University

21 Pa. D. & C.3d 689 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Aug 5, 1981

As stated by the Supreme Court in Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz, 435 U.S. 78 , (1978): “Courts are particularly ill-equipped to evaluate academic performance. . . . … Mahavongasanan v. Hall, 529 F. 2d 448 (5th Cir. 1976) quoting Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education, 294 F. 2d 150 , (5th Cir. 1961), cert. den., 368 U.S. 930 , (1961). Miller v.

Rizzo v. Rohrback

8 Pa. D. & C.3d 122 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 23, 1978

See, e.g., Hilbert v. Roth, 395 Pa. 270, 272 , 149 A. 2d 648 (1959); Brown v. … Knutsen v. Brown, 96 N.J. Super. 229 , 232 A. 2d 833, 836-37 (1967). See also Vaca v. Whitaker, 86 N.M. 79 , 519 *132 P.2d 315 (1974); Cimino v. Alway, 18 Ariz. App. 271 , 501 P.2d 447 (1972); cf., e.g., Hilbert, supra.

Sweigart v. Schaffer B. & L. Ass'n

27 Pa. D. & C. 249 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 28, 1936

Brown, the president of defendant association, who had stated to him that if he did not agree to accept the reduction the association would pay all stockholders willing to accept that proposition, even though they were subsequent … In the case of Nies v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of N. Y., 317 Pa. 545, 549 , Mr.

Commonwealth v. Ford

13 Pa. D. & C.3d 27 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 4, 1979

Holcomb, 357 Pa. 514, 520 , 55 A. 2d 534, 535 (1947); Maxwell v. Farrell School District Board of Directors, 381 Pa. 561 , 112 A. 2d 192 (1955); Highway Paving Co. v. … Board of Arbitration of Claims, 407 Pa. 528, 531 , 180 A. 2d 896, 897-898 (1962); Nicolella v. Trinity Area School District School Board, 444 Pa. 544, 549-51 , 281 A. 2d 832, 834-836 (1971).

Seal-Tite Bag Co. v. Brennen

7 Pa. D. & C.4th 469 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 30, 1989

Cadogan Township v. Dept. of Environmental Resources, 121 Pa. Commw. 18, 20 , 549 A.2d 1363, 1364 (1988). Negligence on the part of counsel is not justification for an appeal nunc pro tunc. Rostosky v. … This will make a change in some judicial districts which require the chainpan of the arbitration board to mail the copies and certify to the mailing on the award file with the prothonotary,... who will mail it and record

Krusch v. Krusch

6 Pa. D. & C. 639 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Aug 13, 1925

In Brown v. Brown, 1 D. & C. 173, and Ganster v. Ganster, 5 D. & C. 503, Judge Landis, of Lancaster County, on the authority of Nagle v. … Brown, C.

Master v. Machen

28 Pa. D. & C. 47 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 3, 1936

In Rafferty et al. v. Central Traction Co. 147 Pa. 579, 584 , Mr. … See also Riley v. Pennsylvania Co., 32 Pa. Superior Ct. 579 .

Tanzer v. Warner Co.

9 Pa. D. & C.3d 534 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 27, 1978

Plaintiffs call on us to review the actions of the board of directors to determine whether or not the merger had a valid “business purpose.” … What this amounts to basically is a difference of views and judgment between the complainants as individual or minority stockholders and the constituted board of management of the corporate affairs as to the value of the

Binkowski v. Highway Truck Drivers & Helpers, Local 107

8 Pa. D. & C.2d 254 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 18, 1957

First, plaintiff could have appealed to the executive board of the local. … A. v. Nalty, supra; Grand International Brotherhood L. E. v. Green, 210 Ala. 496 , 98 So. 569 ; Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Barnhill, 214 Ala. 565 , 108 So. 456 ; Mullen v. Seegers, 220 Mo. App. 847 , 294 S.

Petition of Library Co.

21 Pa. D. & C. 220 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 27, 1934

L. 520, since we do not find authority for the construction of transit facilities in the general acts governing proceedings before the board of view, viz., the Act of May 16, 1891, P. … Co. v. Duncan, 111 Pa. 352 ; Chester Co. v. Brower, supra, p. 656 .

XF Enterprises Inc. v. BASF Corp.

47 Pa. D. & C.4th 147 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 13, 2000

This argument relies heavily on language found in the minority opinion of the case of Collins v. Main Line Board of Realtors, 452 Pa. 342, 350 , 304 A.2d 493, 496 (1973). … In commenting on the common law of antitmst the Supreme Court of the United States in Apex Hosiery Co. v.

Lyons v. State Farm Mutual Insurance

70 Pa. D. & C.2d 298 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 13, 1974

consideration of petitioner’s petition to vacate award of the arbitrators and answer thereto and supporting briefs, the petition to vacate award of the arbitrators is denied, and judgment is entered in the award of the board … Petitioner relies on Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Ealy, 221 Pa. Superior Ct. 138 (1972), as authority that such “stacking” is impermissible.

Kingsley International Pictures Corp. v. Blanc

15 Pa. D. & C.2d 92 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 5, 1958

Action by a board to license or refuse to license motion pictures has been declared unconstitutional in Pennsylvania in Hallmark Productions, Inc., v. Carroll, 384 Pa. 348 . … Clair Township, 377 Pa. 323 ; Adams v. New Kensington, 357 Pa. 557 ; Meadville Park Theatre Corp. v. Mook et al., 337 Pa. 21 .

Townes v. PTC

62 Pa. D. & C.2d 744 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 29, 1973

In Murray v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 292 Pa. 72 , the court directed a verdict for defendant. … The decision in that case turned on the contributory negligence of plaintiff while boarding the trolley car in that she either failed to look and see the plainly improper position of the step or that she saw its unsafe position

Winchester v. Philadelphia

5 Pa. D. & C.3d 422 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 11, 1978

Richard Kaplan, a board-certified orthopedic surgeon. Neither doctor noted any spasm or other objective findings. Plaintiff testified that prior to the accident she had no back problems. Dr. … Plaintiff relies on O’Sullivan v. Ruszecki, 2 D. & C. 3rd 276 (1977).

Shared Communications Services of 1800 & 1880 JFK, Boulevard Inc. v. Bell Atlantic Properties Inc.

30 Pa. D. & C.4th 323 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 1, 1996

Brown’s testimony that Mr. … Brown.

Judge Associates, Inc. v. Belcher

71 Pa. D. & C.2d 112 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 16, 1975

In MacFarland v. Unemployment Compensation Board, 158 Pa. … Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 133 Pa. Superior Ct. 518 , 521, 3 A. 2d 211 . (Italics supplied). That clear pronouncement must stand.”: id. at page 422. In Reading Aviation Service, Inc. v.

Rudick v. Dorfman

40 Pa. D. & C. 706 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 18, 1941

If the fund is in court for distribution: Commonwealth ex rel. v. Order of Solon, etc., 193 Pa. 240 ; or in the hands of a third party: Quakertown & Eastern R. R. Co. v. … Assn. v. Weddell, 115 Pa. Superior Ct. 114 ; National Slovak Society v. Gunther, supra.

Jaspan v. Osser

43 Pa. D. & C.2d 346 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 12, 1967

In Sherwood v. Elk County Board of Elections, 33 D. & C. 2d 230 (1963), the qualifications of a candidate for councilman were challenged. In that case, the attack was made three days after the election. … McLaughlin v.