Case law

Waber v. Norbeck

64 Pa. D. & C.2d 17 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Aug 3, 1973

We make no determination as to whether or not defendants’ use complies with the zoning laws: Perrin’s Appeal, 305 Pa. 42 ; Mazeika v. American Oil Co., 383 Pa. 191 . … We feel under the circumstances, however, as was done in Hannum v.

Wax v. Wax

78 Pa. D. & C. 213 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Sep 21, 1951

(Wolf v. Pa. R. Co., et al. 195 Pa. 91 (1900)), and this is the requirement of Rule 37, Rules of Equity Practice. … It follows, therefore, that the act is voidable at the election of the corporation”: Russel v Henry C. Patterson Company 232 Pa. 113 -120 (1911).

Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. Baldwin Securities Corp.

15 Pa. D. & C.2d 614 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 19, 1958

Where a statute provides for a remedy, it must be strictly pursued to the exclusion of the other methods of redress: Blank v. Board of Adjustment, 390 Pa. 636 (1957). … Northampton *618 County, 342 Pa. 163, 168 , 19 A. 2d 263 ; Thompson v. Morrison, 352 Pa. 616, 624 , 44 A. 2d 55 . See also cases therein cited.

Stroud v. Kramer

13 Pa. D. & C. 240 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 24, 1929

A parol trust becomes valid when in the course of litigation it is confessed by the trustee: Hatcher v. Hatcher, 264 Pa. 105, 110 ; Christy v. Brien, 14 Pa. 248 ; Houser v. … Brown, 165 Pa. 275, 283 ; Kauffman v. Kauffman, 266 Pa. 274, 275, 276 .”

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America

56 Pa. D. & C. 204 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 12, 1946

In David Adler & Sons Co. v. … Chief Justice Hughes, in delivering the opinion of the Supreme Court in Labor Board v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp., 306 U.

Gill v. Pacor, Inc.

24 Pa. D. & C.3d 659 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Aug 13, 1982

V. Show. … See, Chambers v.

Kay v. McKay Chevrolet Corp.

4 Pa. D. & C.3d 367 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 1, 1978

to comply with Rule VI of the Philadelphia Rules of Arbitration which provide that the notice of appeal and service thereof upon the adverse party must be accomplished within 20 days “after the entry of the Award of the Board … As such, the motion to quash is denied: See Gould v. Lampley, 225 Pa. Superior Ct. 107 , 310 A. 2d 420 (1973).

DeLage Linden Financial Services Inc. v. Raynes

51 Pa. D. & C.4th 57 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 10, 2001

Clair Area School District Board of Education v. E.I. Associates, 733 A.2d 677 , 682 n.6 (Pa. … Clair Area School District Board of Education v. E.I. Associates, 733 A.2d 677 , 680 n.4 (Pa. Commw. 1999); Goral v. Fox Ridge Inc., 453 Pa. Super. 316 , 320 n.1, 683 A.2d 931 , 933 n.1 (1996).

Appointment of Nonresident Democratic Watchers

34 Pa. D. & C.2d 69 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Aug 24, 1964

This was clearly brought out in a recent case that decided the exact question that is now before us: Democratic County Executive Committee of *72 Philadelphia v. Board of Elections, 31 D. & C. 2d 434 (1963).

Ryan v. Cassatt

18 Pa. D. & C. 216 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 4, 1933

S. 356 ; United States Smelting Co. v. Hofkin et al., 245 F. 896 ; Maisch v. Order of Americus, 223 Pa. 199 ; Oster v. Brotherhood of Locomotive F. & E. et al., 271 Pa. 419 . … The same view was adopted in McMillen v.

Simmons v. West

2 Miles 196 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 31, 1838

The facts of Beltzhoover v. … And in Goodwin v.

General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corporation's Appeal

32 Pa. D. & C. 118 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 1, 1938

Liability for the personal property tax as to these securities was denied and an application was made to the board of revision of taxes for correction of the personal property assessment, but this was refused. … directs that particular property or a certain fund shall be held or dealt with in a particular manner for the benefit of another, raises a trust in favor of such other person against the person making it”: Cumberland County v.

Lee v. School District of Philadelphia

51 Pa. D. & C.2d 504 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 7, 1971

Mindful of such duties, defendant, Philadelphia School District, issued a regulation for use in the schools entitled “Policy Respecting the Rights of Students to Circulate Petitions and Handbills, to Use Bulletin Boards and … The board of school directors may, upon cause shown, permit any . . . pupils in any school district to attend such other school in the district as the board may deem proper, or may classify and assign the pupils in the district

Ziernicki v. Gazdzik

3 Pa. D. & C. 169 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 9, 1923

Hubbard, 211 Pa. 331 ; Murdy v. McCutcheon, 95 Pa. 435 ; Murtland v. Floyd et al., 153 Pa. 99 ; Donnelly v. Graham et al., 77 Pa. 274 ; Minnich v. Railway Co., 203 Pa. 632 . … See, also, Scrantonian v. Brown, 36 Pa. Superior Ct. 170 . In the case of Ganzer v. Fricke, 57 Pa. 316 , the action was against Conrad, Ganzer and Fisher as partners.

Franklin Trust Co. v. Hegh

6 Pa. D. & C. 231 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 23, 1925

In Bayne v. United States, 93 U. … C. 236; Love-Thompson Co. v. Brass, 70 Pitts, L. J. 501; Maitland Driving Park Ass’n v. Fisk, 3 Lacka. Leg. News, 210 , and O’Neill v. Brown, 17 Dist. R. 1062.

McGratton v. Burke

24 Pa. D. & C.4th 303 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 18, 1995

On November 2,1993, plaintiff filed a timely appeal from the decision of the board of arbitrators. … Murray v. McCann, supra, 658 A.2d at 408 n.3. . But see Barrack v. Kolea, 438 Pa. Super. 11, 25 , 651 A.2d 149, 156 (1994).

Yett v. Osterneck

58 Pa. D. & C. 198 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 25, 1947

Y. v. Cimino, 108 N. J. L. 243, 157 Atl. 152 ; Townsend et al. v. Appel Sons, Inc., 164 Md. 255 , 164 Atl. 679 ; Rader v. Goldoff et al., 228 N. Y. Supp. 453 ; Sherwood v. Jackson, 121 Cal. App. 354 , 8P. (2d) 943. 2. … et al. v.

Curran v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia

77 Pa. D. & C.4th 225 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 23, 2005

E.J.M. v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, 424 Pa. Super. 449, 454 , 622 A.2d 1388, 1391 (1993). … See also, Dalrymple v. Brown, 549 Pa. 217 , 701 A.2d 164, 176 (1997).

Ash Trust

48 Pa. D. & C.2d 629 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 18, 1969

Latta, in behalf of Juanita V. Ash, the wife-trustee, and Mr. Brown, the guardian and trustee ad litem, contend that Omar L. … In McClements v.

Emery v. Dyches

62 Pa. D. & C.2d 250 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 22, 1973

In Flouder v. Foster, 212 Pa. … Samuels v.