Case law

Rubin v. Goldberg

18 Pa. D. & C. 371 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 21, 1932

Brown, Jr., J., The bill prays for the cancellation of a bill of sale of the fixtures, equipment and good-will of a restaurant at No. 1329 Race Street, Philadelphia, purchased by plaintiff from the defendants, Anna Budman … West Shoe Co. et al. v. Lemish et al., 279 Pa. 414, 417 . See, also, Miller v. Myers et al., 300 Pa. 192, 199 .

Carney v. Carney

35 Pa. D. & C. 221 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 3, 1939

Justice Williams in Goodyear v. Brown, 155 Pa. 514, 518 (1893), defined public policy as follows: “In a general way it may be said that public policy means the public good. … See Massaletti v. Fitzroy, 228 Mass. 487 ; Marcienowski v. Sanders, 252 Mass. 65 ; Epps v. Parrish, 26 Ga. App. 399 .

Harris v. Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

71 Pa. D. & C.4th 64 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 28, 2004

Alan Rushton M.D., Ph.D., a board-certified pediatrician. Dr. … Koken v. Lederman, 840 A.2d 446 (Pa. Commw. 2003).

Germantown Trust Co. v. Buckley

21 Pa. D. & C. 397 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 3, 1934

See Miller’s Appeal, 2 Penny. 72 , and Christ v. Dubosky, 14 Schuyl. 114, and, on appeal, 261 Pa. 297 . The petitioner argues that because of the effects and consequences of this action the entry should be expunged. … Justice Walling, then president judge of the Erie County court, in Rusterholtz v. Brown, 10 Dist. R. 21.

Patterson Building & Loan Ass'n No. 2 v. Bolif

18 Pa. D. & C. 119 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 7, 1932

See Alters v. Journeymen Bricklayers Protective Ass’n, 19 Pa. … In Hockfield v.

Krompasky v. Danube B. & L. Ass'n

34 Pa. D. & C. 249 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 31, 1938

“The board of directors are of the opinion that under present conditions it is impractical for the association to function advantageously and that it would be advisable to liquidate.” … Assn. et al. v. Polak, 102 Pa. Superior Ct. 36 ; Caruso v. Members B. & L. Assn., 115 Pa. Superior Ct. 212 . We are of opinion that this petition is not ripe for disposition at the present time.

Heimerdinger v. Homeseekers Building Ass'n

18 Pa. D. & C. 261 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 5, 1932

It requires no action by the board of directors to make this fact so. Either the fund has accumulated to a degree where the aggregate makes each share of stock worth $200 or it has not. … As was said by Simpson, J., in Sperling v. Euclid B. & L.

Mollenhauer v. Glat

1 Pa. D. & C.5th 543 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 3, 2006

Clark was a member of a board similar to the board encompassing *548 plastic surgery, namely, the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstruction Surgery. He also was board-certified in surgery. … Krutchik is board-certified. Furthermore, Dr.

David Magen, Builder, Inc. v. Price

36 Pa. D. & C. 74 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 27, 1939

Brown, J., This case is before the court in banc on defendants’ “motion for final decree”. *75 The petition for declaratory judgment was filed on November 20, 1938, wherein it was averred, inter alia, that on August 29, 1938 … The importance of this “formal inquiry” was emphasized in Easton Bank v.

Hartman v. Schuylkill Valley Transit Co.

17 Pa. D. & C. 722 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 4, 1933

There is a line of eases, of which the best examples are Lesko v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co., 270 Pa. 15 , and Gausman v. R. T. … Typical of such cases is Samoskie v.

Bisbee Linseed Co. v. Phœnix Paint & Varnish Co.

19 Pa. D. & C. 422 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Sep 21, 1933

In White v. … in White v.

Crosbie v. City of Philadelphia

20 Pa. D. & C.2d 65 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 12, 1959

It should be noted that the decisions in General Assembly v. Gratz, supra, and Mattern v. … Board of Revision of Taxes, of City of Philadelphia, 107 Pa. Superior Ct. 108 , 163 Atl. 317 ; Commonwealth v. Lowry-Rodgers Co., 279 Pa. 361 , 123 Atl. 855 ; Commonwealth v. Wark Co., 301 Pa. 150 , 151 Atl. 786 .

Bricklayers' Local No. 1 of Pennsylvania Welfare Fund

14 Pa. D. & C.2d 468 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 27, 1957

See Board of Commissioners v. United States, 308 U. S. 343, 351 . Federal interpretation of the federal law will govern, not state law. Cf. Jerome v. United States, 318 U. S. 101, 104 . … See Board of Commissioners v. United States, supra, at 351-352. Any state law applied, however, will be absorbed as federal law and will not be an independent source of private rights.”

Turner v. SEPTA

19 Pa. D. & C.4th 542 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 10, 1993

In SEPTA v. … Subsequently, in Crowell v.

O'Neill v. Jaffurs

64 Pa. D. & C.2d 429 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 20, 1973

These statements made to the press are totally independent of any duties of the Pennsylvania Attorney General or of the State Liquor Control Board. … Curtis Publishing Co., 441 Pa. 432 , 273 A. 2d 899 (1971) and Raible v. Newsweek, Inc. (W.D. Pa.), 341 F. Supp. 804 (1972).

Summerfield Methodist Episcopal Church v. City of Philadelphia

88 Pa. D. & C. 134 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 14, 1954

‘But, where the power *137 to tax appears, and the complaint is over-assessment, or inadequate exemption, the remedy is by an appeal to the common pleas from the action of the board of revision’ : Dougherty v. … We do not seé where any injury resulted to the city or the school board by this delay. In Pennsylvania Company for Banking and Trusts, Trustee, v. Philadelphia, 167 Pa.

Hemispherx Biopharma Inc. v. Asensio

55 Pa. D. & C.4th 502 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Sep 6, 2001

Brown v. Philadelphia Tribune Co., 447 Pa. Super. 52, 59 , 668 A.2d 159, 163 (1995); Iafrate v. Hadesty, 423 Pa. Super. 619, 623 , 621 A.2d 1005, 1007 (1993); Wagstaff v. The Morning Call Inc., 41 D. … Brown, 447 Pa. Super. at 59 , 668 A.2d at 162 (quoting Hutchinson v.

Commonwealth v. Sgorbati

49 Pa. D. & C.2d 173 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 4, 1970

See Commonwealth v. Haugh, 215 Pa. Superior Ct. 160, 161 (dissenting opinion of Hoffman, J.); State ex rel. Maley v. Civic Action Committee, 238 Iowa 851 , 28 N.W. 2d 467 (1947). … of Education v.

Lauria v. Kaye

14 Pa. D. & C.3d 604 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 14, 1979

Stauffer v. … Board of Directors, School Dist. of Scranton, 462 Pa. 464 , 341 A. 2d 475 (1975); Zebra v. Pittsburgh School District, 449 Pa. 432 , 296 A. 2d 748 (1972); Keystone Guild, Inc. v.

Trower v. Dursell

2 Pa. D. & C.3d 192 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 28, 1977

However, a potential appellant who makes a substantial effort to comply with this requirement will not be precluded from appealing because of failure to pay the precise amount due within 20 days: Black and Brown, Inc. v. … Thus, a statutory attorney’s fee has not “accrued” at the arbitration stage because the statutory fee is not deemed “earned” until a judgment is obtained in a case: Lanigan v. Lewis, 210 Pa.