Case law

Sunno v. Samuel

76 Pa. D. & C. 207 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 2, 1951

Building Committee of Warren Borough et al., 334 Pa. 10 ; Sinking Fund Commissioners of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia et al., 324 Pa. 129 . … Thus, in the case of Wallace v. Board of Education of the *211 City of Los Angeles et al., 63 Cal.

Sudarkasa v. Glanton

57 Pa. D. & C.4th 472 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 30, 2002

V. BREACH OF DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY AND LOYALTY Dr. … Brownsville Golden Age Nursing Home v.

Kowalski v. Shopping Cart, Inc.

56 Pa. D. & C.2d 571 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 3, 1972

See ‘also Bosco v. Lacich, 44 D. & C. 2d 361 (1968). … As the court said in Edmunds v.

Cheetham v. Local No. 222, United Garment Workers

55 Pa. D. & C. 28 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Sep 18, 1945

It is the duty of a reviewing court to ascertain if such a power has been exercised in accordance with the requirements of the fundamental laws of the association: Compare Maloney v. … This requires an impartial hearing, and though the by-laws failed to make such provision our judicial requirements of fair play would insist upon it: See Heasley et al. v.

Pennsylvania Optometric Ass'n v. DiGiovanni

45 Pa. D. & C.2d 245 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 15, 1968

New Jersey State Board of Optometrists v. Reiss, 83 N.J. Super. 47, 57-58 , 198 A. 2d 816, 821-822 (1964) (Italics supplied.) … Melton, Jr. v. W. C. Ezell, Constituting The South Carolina Board of Examiners in Optometry, Court of Common Pleas of Richland County, State of South Carolina (Jan., 1967). Defendant cites High v.

Bokser v. Feraco

64 Pa. D. & C.2d 383 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 6, 1973

Superior Ct. 165 , 155 A. 2d 388 (1959), and Boone v. … Nevertheless, in Klugman v. Gimbel Bros., Inc., 198 Pa.

Johnson v. Benjamin Franklin Hotel Co.

49 Pa. D. & C. 505 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 15, 1943

International Harvester Co. of America, supra, p. 467; Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank v. Rawlins et al., 129 S.W. (2d) 485, 486 (Tex. Civ. App., 1939) ; Brown v. Palmer et al., 157 Fed. 797 (U.S.C.C. E. … D. of Pa., 1907) ; Kurtz v. Brown, 152 Fed. 372 (C.C.A. 3rd, 1906); Brown v. McDonald et al., 133 Fed. 897 (C.C.A. 3rd, 1905) ; Coca-Cola Co. et al. v.

Brendley v. Rohm & Haas Co.

79 Pa. D. & C.4th 139 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 30, 2006

In Creighan v. … Quoting the precise language of Creighan , the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania reaffirmed this broad definition of “injury” in Pawlosky v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 514 Pa. 450 , 525 A.2d 1204 (1987).

Chicago Coliseum Club v. Dempsey

8 Pa. D. & C. 420 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 9, 1926

In Indianapolis Water Co. v. American Straw-Board Co., 65 Fed. Repr. 534, 535, Judge Baker says: “Primarily, a deposition is simply written testimony. It is testimony that is deposited or laid down in writing. … Notwithstanding the forcible criticism of Gibson, J., in Gordon v. Little, 7 Sergeant & Rawle, 533, 555, of the practice of taking testimony by commission, and the recent Acts of June 25, 1895, P.

Fanelli v. Independence Blue Cross

75 Pa. D. & C.4th 10 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 11, 2005

Hayes requested a copy of the tape recording of the medical board’s meeting during which the board deliberated and decided upon its recommendation. Defendants contended that the Peer Review Act barred Dr. … D.S. v. DePaul Institute, 32 D.

Butcher v. Tate

4 Pa. D. & C.2d 660 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 21, 1955

Justice Sharswood in 1869, in Bladen v. Philadelphia, 60 Pa. 464 , and again in 1873, in Pittsburgh v. … Fortney v. Wozney, 326 Pa. 494, 497 (1937).

Atlantic Refining Co. v. Cohen

34 Pa. D. & C. 365 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 2, 1938

Brown, Jr., J., Plaintiff has presented a petition praying for a reargument of the motion for preliminary injunction on the ground that the Labor Anti-Injunction Act of June 2, 1937, P. L. 1198, is unconstitutional. … The case involves “grave questions of constitutional law which can only be properly considered after a careful appraisal of all the relevant facts and circumstances”: Harrisburg Dairies, Inc., v.

Werden Lumber Co. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

6 Pa. D. & C. 551 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 17, 1925

The defendant concedes that, under the authority of Brown v. … There are other modifications of this rule, as recognized in the later cases; Rushton v. Rowe, 64 Pa. 63, 66 , in which Mackey v. Hodgson and Irwin v.

Hudson v. Shoemaker

16 Pa. D. & C.4th 143 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 21, 1992

Petruzzi v. City of Philadelphia, supra; Bell v. Lauth, 5 D.&C.3d 261 (1977). … , Grant v.

Coffey v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

48 Pa. D. & C.2d 553 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 25, 1969

After much consideration, this court has reached the conclusion that the award of the board of arbitrators was correct. … A recent case very much in point is South Branch Valley National Bank v. Williams, 151 W. Va. 775 , 155 S.E. 2d 845 (1967). That case involved practically the same facts as the instant case.

Osborne v. United Gas Improvement Co.

51 Pa. D. & C. 383 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 5, 1944

In Busser et al. v. … See Retirement Board of Allegheny County v. McGovern et al., 316 Pa. 161 . We are of the opinion that the plan is constitutional, legal, and valid.

Samuel Estate

47 Pa. D. & C.2d 116 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 11, 1969

In Howard Savings Institution v. Peep, 34 N. … Wilber v. Owens, 2 N. J. 167, 177 (1949); Restatement, Trusts §399. . .

Hoffman v. Mount Lebanon Cemetery Co.

47 Pa. D. & C.2d 51 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 16, 1968

In the meantime, the question of compensation to Goldstein and Abrams was brought to the attention of the board of directors. … The law in this case is controlled by Sharp v. McKelvey, 196 Pa.

Commonwealth ex rel. Cox v. Banmiller

25 Pa. D. & C.2d 747 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 21, 1961

The Board of Parole contends that relator’s new sentence began June 18, 1958, and that the maximum sentence will not expire until May of 1963. … Godfrey v. Ban-miller, supra. We find the principles therein enunciated to be applicable and controlling.

Ellis v. Johnson

61 Pa. D. & C. 271 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Aug 7, 1947

Brown, a licensed fight trainer, was satisfied with and was desirous of having plaintiff become minor defendant’s fight manager.” … R. 697), it will not enforce an infant’s contract for personal services by injunction restraining him from rendering similar services to others: Bradley v. Cool et al., 18 D. & C. 404. See also Cain v.