Case law

Philadelphia v. United States Housing Corp.

2 Pa. D. & C. 799 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 5, 1923

In Sloan Shipyard Corporation et al. v. United States Shipping Board, Emergency Fleet Corporation, and the United States, 258 U. … In Sullivan v. United States Shipping Board, Emergency Fleet Corporation, 76 Pa.

Albert M. Greenfield Foundation v. Bankers Securities Corp.

7 Pa. D. & C.3d 535 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 28, 1978

See Tankersley v. Albright, 514 F. 2d 956 (7th Cir. 1975). … See Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 56 F.R.D. 499 (S.D. Ala. 1972), 430 F. 2d 1093 (5th Circuit 1970); Valente v. Pepsico, Inc., 68 F.R.D. 361 (D. Del. 1975).

Bradford v. Bradford

79 Pa. D. & C. 363 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 19, 1951

See Brown v. Brown, 163 Pa. Superior Ct. 490 ; Martin v. Martin, 154 Pa. Superior Ct. 313 . While nonsupport in itself does not constitute an indignity (Fisher v. Fisher, 154 Pa. … Cf. the leading Maryland case of Brown v. Scott, 140 Md. 258 , 117 Atl. 114 . I conclude that plaintiff has not established her right to a divorce on the ground of fraud.

Hudson Recreation Co. v. Bowling, Billiard & Athletic Employes' Union, Local 209

39 Pa. D. & C. 655 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 13, 1940

had rendered a *657 decision and if an election were ordered by that board they agreed to abide by the result of that election. … See also Flashner v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters, etc., 37 D. & C. 337, Tappins, Inc., v. United Credit Stores Employes’ Union, C. P. 5 (Phila. Co.), March term, 1940, no. 5447, and Phillips & Ostroff *663 v.

Weissman v. Stoelker

61 Pa. D. & C.2d 463 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 6, 1973

Plaintiff refused this offer and through her counsel petitioned for a board of view. … Before the board of view entered an award, the tenant of plaintiff filed a claim which required a second hearing before the board of view on May 1, 1964. Briefs were submitted and argument heard.

Commonwealth ex rel. Meehan v. Warden of the County Prison

6 Pa. D. & C.2d 547 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Sep 22, 1955

At the April session of the Pennsylvania Board of Pardons, petitioner’s sentences on bills 74 and 76, April sessions, 1948, were commuted. … Guiramez v. Ashe, Warden, 293 Pa. 18 , and Commonwealth ex rel. Dennis v. Ashe, Warden, 161 Pa.

Rich v. Phila. Fire Dept. Relief Ass'n

5 Pa. D. & C.2d 80 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 26, 1955

Grier v. … Commonwealth ex rel. v. Acker et al., 308 Pa. 29 ; Commonwealth ex rel. Laughlin, Jr., et al., v. Green et al., 351 Pa. 170 .

McHenry v. Clark

87 Pa. D. & C. 348 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 1, 1953

In Carrow v. … In Straw v.

City of Philadelphia v. Boris

65 Pa. D. & C.4th 154 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 7, 2004

Tang v. Hwang, 799 F. Supp. 499 (USDC, E.D. … Flanagan v. Labe, 547 Pa. 254 , 690 A.2d 183 (1997).

Slotsky v. Gellar

49 Pa. D. & C.2d 255 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 22, 1969

Illustrative cases are Bowman v. Gum, Incorporated, 321 Pa. 516 (1936); Schipper Bros. Coal Mining Co. v. Economy Domestic Coal Co., 277 Pa. 356 (1923); Garrett v. George K. Garrett Co., Inc., 39 D. & C. 179 (1940). … For example, in Bowman v.

Cushman v. Pennsylvania Museum & School of Industrial Art

10 Pa. D. & C. 316 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 27, 1928

In Com. v. … The instant case is distinguishable from Kulp v.

Farmers & Mechanics Bank v. Schreiner

1 Miles 291 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 2, 1836

The arrears are then plainly an incumbrance, and Judge Yeates, in Gordon v. Curry, 5 Binn. 553 , expressly designates the arrears of the rent as an incumbrance upon the land. Chief Justice Gibson, in Brown v. … Mary's Church v. Miles, 1 Wharton 235 , “ susceptible of being hi a en d « ,ilumi ccnil’cf,” Die owner of the ground rent ce n i ' ■ a u, 1 ime. ,,t.

Fogel Refrigerator Co. v. Oteri

10 Pa. D. & C.2d 511 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Aug 9, 1957

Brown & Co. v. Raub, 357 Pa. 271 . Manifestly the writings fall far short of the “greatest particularity” standard imposed in Morton v. Ambridge Borough, supra. … Brown & Co. v.

Candidi v. Candidi

87 Pa. D. & C. 96 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 31, 1953

In Ritter v. … In Brown v.

Kelly v. American Stores Co.

2 Pa. D. & C. 697 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 8, 1923

Co., 201 Pa. 448 ; Greed v. Manufacturers’ Light and Heat Co., 238 Pa. 248 ; Leonard v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co., 259 Pa. 51 ; McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Co., 261 Pa. 312 ; Eline v. Western Maryland Ry. … Since, however, we sustain the exceptions to the findings of fact, and reverse the action of the board founded thereon, we order the record remitted to the board for further hearing and determination under section 427 of

Leonard v. Edward G. Budd Manufacturing Co.

34 Pa. D. & C. 331 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 23, 1938

Exceptions to the findings of the Workmen’s Compensation Board are now before us on appeal. … We are in sympathy to a great extent with the view expressed by the board and we are regretfully constrained to agree with the conclusions of the referee and the board.

Lee Estate

50 Pa. D. & C.2d 243 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 21, 1970

The statement of proposed distribution lists as admitted the following claims: Calvin Presbyterian Church, Board of Deacons, loan, $300; Board of Pensions of United Presbyterian Church of U. … Cf. also Chernock v. Gardner, 360 F. 2d 257, 259 (3 Cir., 1966) and Swotes v. Gardner, 392 F. 2d 428 (3 Cir., 1968).”

Godfrey v. Ziemak

18 Pa. D. & C. 195 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 29, 1932

Superior Ct. 401 ; Browne et al. v. Hoekstra, 279 Pa. 418 . There have been many cases in which payment of principal to an agent of a mortgagee has been held to bind the mortgagee. … Herr, supra; Patterson, Trustee, v. Van Loon, Exec’r, supra,; Colonial Trust Co. v. Davis et ux., supra; Dobbs, Exec’r, v. Zink et ux., supra. The border line case is that of Browne et al. v.

Clair v. Noce

72 Pa. D. & C. 216 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 6, 1950

Brown & Co. v. Raub et al., 357 Pa. 271 (1947). … Brown & Co. v. Raub, supra, at page 287. Here the parties chose to set forth the remedies of the seller.

Source Healthcare Analytics, Inc. v. SDI Health LLC

36 Pa. D. & C.5th 164 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 14, 2014

At the December 9, 2010 IMS board meeting, the IMS Board authorized Bousbid to pay $340 million to acquire SDI. N.T. 9/26/13 a.m. p. 75 (Linn). The board was willing to give Bousbid authority up to 400 million. Id. 137. … Id. quoting Aiken Indus., Ind. v. Estate of Wilson, 477 Pa. 34, 383 A.2d 808, 812 (Pa. 1978). . Trosky v. Civil Service Comm’n, 539 Pa. 356 , 652 A.2d 813 (Pa. 1995). MC Baldwin Fin. Co. v.