Case law

Smith v. City of Philadelphia

28 Pa. D. & C.4th 97 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 15, 1996

The board is required by the Home Rule Charter to comply with the solicitor’s opinions. See e.g., Philadelphia Department of License & Inspections v. … See e.g., Philadelphia Board, of License & Inspection Review v. 2600 Lewis Inc., 661 A.2d 20 (Pa. Commw. 1995). .

Staples v. McShain

70 Pa. D. & C. 556 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 1, 1950

Superior Ct. 192 ), and appellants have the burden of showing affirmatively that the board abused its discretion: Perelman et al. v. Yeadon Borough Board of Adjustment et al., 144 Pa. … President Judge Bok in Elvan v.

Commonwealth ex rel. Cavallucci v. Burke

84 Pa. D. & C. 449 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 27, 1952

Allen v. Baldi, C. P. … However, it is not within our province nor within our power to act as a Pardon Board. The death of the late President Judge Harry S.

Bromley v. Hadley

10 Pa. D. & C. 23 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 1, 1927

In Com. ex rel. v. Murphy, 11 Dist. … “This clerk is not required to take an oath of office, gives no bond, and can be appointed at the pleasure of the board:” Com. ex rel. v. Murphy, supra.

Wahs v. Wolf

43 Pa. D. & C. 644 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 20, 1942

Superior Ct. 237, 242 (1940), Dobash v. Jeddo-Highland Coal Co., 141 Pa. Superior Ct. 62, 65 (1940), Koreen v. Union Collieries Co., 141 Pa. Superior Ct. 70, 72 (1940), and Coder v. … Thus, in Berkstresser v.

Margolin v. Pennsylvania Railroad

23 Pa. D. & C.2d 477 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Aug 18, 1959

Brown, Jr., P. J., This case is before the court en banc on the motion of plaintiffs for a new trial. … Brown & Co. v. Raub, 357 Pa. 271, 287 .

Staton Appeal

47 Pa. D. & C.2d 657 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 11, 1969

Thus, in Pointer v. … See Miranda v. Arizona, supra, at 467 and Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, at 655-56 (1961).

Weiner v. Pennsylvania Institute of Certified Public Accountants

59 Pa. D. & C.2d 448 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Sep 22, 1972

Jur. 169, 179; Commonwealth ex rel., v. Heilman, 241 Pa. 374, 378 . … United Mine Workers of America, 308 Pa. *454 251, 257 ; Lodge No. 19, Svete Ime Isusovo v. Svi Sveti, 323 Pa. 292, 294-95 .

Genovese Appeal

18 Pa. D. & C.2d 585 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 8, 1959

Pittsburgh Housing Authority, 379 Pa. 566 (1955)), even though this court may have found differently; Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Kaufmann Department Stores, Inc., 345 Pa. *591 398 (1942); Cage v. … In Eways v.

Baldi v. City of Philadelphia

53 Pa. D. & C. 642 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 18, 1945

Margiotti v. Sutton et al., 327 Pa. 337 ; Wilson et ux. v. … Kelley v.

Paynter v. Clegg

2 Foster 4 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 20, 1873

That some feeling exists among a portion of the members, and that there is a pending contest over the election for ¡Secretary and two member^ of the board of directors is apparent. … The Supreme Court decided, in Updegraff v. Crans, .it Wright, 103, that it was the appropriate statutory remedy, and ousted ■the equity jurisdiction of the court.

Berry v. Drexel Institute of Technology

50 Pa. D. & C. 587 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 5, 1943

See Lichtenwallner v. Laubach, 105 Pa. 366 (1884), and John v. Reick-McJunkin Dairy Co., 281 Pa. 543 (1924). We do not express an opinion on that score. As for Dr. … See Central Guarantee Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. White, 206 Pa. 611 (1903).

Pupo v. Janney Cylinder Co.

12 Pa. D. & C.3d 617 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 19, 1979

Brown Equip. Rental v. Dickey, 397 Pa. 454 , 155 A. 2d 836 (1959). … In support of his position he quotes the following passages from Brown v.

Baldi v. White

52 Pa. D. & C. 550 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 6, 1945

McLennan v. Wilbur, 283 U. S. 414 . … In Shisler v.

Hahnemann Hospital's Appeal

34 Pa. D. & C. 212 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 6, 1939

“The extent of land to be embraced in the activities of a charitable association must be largely determined by the governing board. … Superior Ct. 640 , Mercersburg College v. Mercersburg Borough, 53 Pa. Superior Ct. 388 , Philadelphia v. Ladies’ United Aid Society, 154 Pa. 12 , Philadelphia v. Jewish Hospital Assn., 148 Pa. 454 , Pittsburgh v.

Fritsche v. O'Neill

38 Pa. D. & C. 43 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 28, 1939

Justice Linn said in Fedak v. Dzialdowski, 101 Pa. Superior Ct. 346, 348 (speaking for the Superior Court) : ' “The board has ample power to grant rehearings; Sec. 426, 1919, P. L. 642, 645; 1927, P. … L. 186, 196; 77 PS Sec. 871; Manley v. Lycoming Motors Corp., 83 Pa. Superior Ct. 173 .” See also Porto v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co., 124 Pa. Superior Ct. 431 .

Atterbury v. McGlinn

24 Pa. D. & C. 460 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 10, 1935

In Brown et al. v. … The applicable rules of law under the circumstances should not be decided until an opportunity has been afforded to develop the facts at the trial: Wilson v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co., 225 Pa. 143 ; Brown et al. v.

Woolf v. Bardinet Exports, Inc.

77 Pa. D. & C. 230 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 11, 1951

This finding was affirmed by the board. … v.

McGonigle v. Ansel

79 Pa. D. & C.4th 29 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 23, 2006

Godlewski v. Pars Manufacturing Company, 408 Pa. … Dalrymple v. Brown, 549 Pa. 217, 223 , 701 A.2d 164, 167 (1997).

Sullivan v. American Bridge Co.

21 Pa. D. & C. 362 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 11, 1934

Defendant appealed to the Workmen’s Compensation Board, and the board affirmed the award of the referee, making supplemental findings of fact. Defendant has appealed to this court. … In this connection, the case of Travers v. Reinhardt, 205 U. S. 423 , is exactly in point. In that case, a man and woman were ostensibly married by religious ceremony in Virginia.