Case law

Capone v. Roitman

49 Pa. D. & C.3d 348 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 17, 1988

Greive v. Mt. Clemens Hospital, 404 Mich. 240 , 273 N.W. 2d 429 (1978); (2) The hospital “holds out” the physician as its employee. Brown v. Moore, 247 F.2d 711 (3d Cir. 1957) (applying Pennsylvania law). … Is it the board of directors? The president of the hospital? The chairman of the board? An ethics committee? An educational committee? An internal review committee? A credentials committee?

Barrone v. Ventresca

55 Pa. D. & C. 480 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 25, 1945

Callihan v. Montgomery, 272 Pa. 56 . In considering this case we have in mind the rule recently reiterated in Krchmar v. Oakland Beach Company, 155 Pa. … In Dzikowska v.

Brooklyn Trust Co. v. Warrington

2 Pa. D. & C. 361 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 27, 1922

The paper as written must speak for itself: Wallize v. Wallize, 55 Pa. 242 .” In the case of Robinson v. Williams, 1 W. N. C. 337 (1875), not reported in Penna. … Brown, deceased, which will was duly probated *363 both in the State of New York and the State of Pennsylvania.”

Intille v. Hoyer

88 Pa. D. & C. 512 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 6, 1954

See Fenstermacher’s Appeal, 36 D. & C. 373; Horosko v. School District, supra, and Commonwealth ex rel. v. Sunbury School District et al., 335 Pa. 6 . … See also Mangan v. McNair, Mayor, 321 Pa. 446 ; Crawford v. Clairton City et al., 334 Pa. 120, 123 , and Skidmore et al. v. Swift & Co., 323 U. S. 134, 137 .

Christie v. Kun

2 Pa. D. & C.2d 582 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 10, 1954

In Bolton v. Walker, 197 Mich. 699 , 164 N. W. 420 , Ann. Cas. 1918 E 1007 (1917), it was held that defamatory words spoken before a board which had a legislative or judicial function were privileged. … In Allen v. Biggs et al., 62 F.

Devlin v. City of Philadelphia

48 Pa. D. & C.4th 86 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 5, 2000

Brown v. Commonwealth, Liquor Control Board, 673 A.2d 21 (Pa. Commw. 1996). The Fair Practice Act amendments contain multiple provisions impacting upon employment, public accommodations and discrimination at large. … See Schaefer v. City and County of Denver, 973 P.2d 717 (1998); Crawford v. City of Chicago, 710 N.E.2d 91, 98 (Ill. App. 1999); Slattery v.

Fronczek v. Independent Mfg. Co.

59 Pa. D. & C. 612 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 27, 1947

. *614 The earlier cases justify the board in rejecting the claim. The opinion in Leacock v. Susquehanna Collieries Co., 98 Pa. Superior Ct. 581 (1930), quotes from Morucci v. … See also Malky v. Kiskiminetas Valley Coal Co., supra, and Carlin v. Coxe Bros. & Co., Inc., 274 Pa. 38 (1922). *616 In cases like Carlin v. Coxe Bros., supra, Horn v. Fitler Co. et al., 115 Pa.

Osser v. City of Philadelphia

10 Pa. D. & C.3d 690 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 28, 1979

Sections 1341 , 1342, 371 and 1510.” 2 On *692 March 12, 1976, almost 39 months after he had resigned, Osser filed a pension claim with the Board of Pensions and Retirement of Philadelphia (Board), seeking monthly pension … Distinguish Kane v.

In re Plot of Ground for Municipal Purposes

8 Pa. D. & C. 739 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 13, 1927

Selig, and the award made to him by the board has not been appealed or excepted to by either party. … The object is that which is pointed out in Munigle v. Boston, 3 Allen, 230 , 232, and the meaning is that the landlord can terminate the right of the tenant to share in the damages. See, further, Burbridge v.

Novello v. Medical Electronics & Research Corp.

60 Pa. D. & C.2d 355 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Sep 22, 1971

The payment of the salary schedules for 1961, 1962 and 1963, established by the board, was made subject to the availability of funds for the purpose. … Westinghouse Electric Co. v. Murphy, Inc., 425 Pa. 166 (1967); Ludwig Honold Mfg. Co. v. Fletcher, 405 F. 2d 1123 (1969); Kennedy v. Erkman, 389 Pa. 651 (1957). Neville Chemical Co. v.

Wasserman Petition

70 Pa. D. & C.2d 640 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 15, 1975

Thereafter, on August 22, 1973, said petition was granted and three members were appointed as a board of view. … In Singer v.

First N. Bank v. Fiske

133 Pa. 241 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 17, 1890

Dickey, 5 Binn. *245 287 ; Hursh v. … 40 Pa. 241 . ft is admissible to add incidents to a contract which are not inconsistent with its terms, and to ascertain the intention of the parties in reference to matters about which the contract is silent: Clarke’s Browne

Titgen v. Smith

68 Pa. D. & C. 207 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 17, 1949

The city’s right to adopt this course is fully sustained by the decision of the Supreme Court in American Pavement Company v. Wagner, 139 Pa. 623 ; Brener v. City of Philadelphia, 305 Pa. 182 ; Mazet v. … Funk, Revelle Brown, William Canning and James T. Haviland.

Kahn v. Seeds

20 Pa. D. & C. 365 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 3, 1934

Heiligman, J., This matter comes before the court on the petition of a property owner to review the decision of the Board of Adjustment administering the zoning ordinance of the City of Philadelphia enacted pursuant to the … The facts in this case are similar to those presented in the case of Kahn v. Seeds et al. (No. 1), 20 D. & C. 361, in which an opinion has been filed this day.

In re Edwin Forrest Home

1 Pa. Fid. 219 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 24, 1981

The board of managers of the Edwin Forrest Home (hereinafter “Respondents”) disagree. … The incidental mention of a breach of trust in Article V of the will does not in any way alter the manner in which the Home holds the property.

1300 Washington Avenue, L.P. v. City of Philadelphia Bd. of Revision of Taxes

21 Pa. D. & C.5th 285 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 25, 2011

Buhl Found v. Board of Property Assessment of Allegheny County, 407 Pa. 567, 570 , 180 A.2d 900, 902 (1962). … Although appellant’s counsel cites Hoffman v.

Fairman v. A.A. Gallagher Warehousing Corp.

11 Pa. D. & C.3d 290 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 8, 1979

Superior Ct. 84 , 323 A. 2d 154 (1974) (duty to investigate arises when reasonable person would recognize existence of risk); Brown v. … Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public Education, 453 Pa. 584, 599 , 305 A. 2d 877, 886 (1973). . There has been a strong tendency on the part of most courts to frown upon any kind of governmental immunity. See Nevada v.

Bedell v. Oliver H. Bair Co.

15 Pa. D. & C. 405 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 11, 1931

See, also, Southwick v. Bank, 84 N. Y. 420 ; Stephens v. Board of Education, 3 Hun. 712 , 715; United States v. Park Bank, 6 Fed. 852 ; Marine Bank v. City Bank, 59 N. Y. 67 . 2. In Leather Manufacturers’ Bank v. … In Brown v. Campbell, 1 S. & R. 176, the defendant had mistakenly appropriated, through hi¡3 agents, certain moneys, which were subsequently discovered to belong to the plaintiff, to his own use. Tilghman, C.

Harcourt Wells, Inc. v. Cohen

6 Pa. D. & C.3d 183 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 30, 1978

Solomon & Sons Trust v. New England Th. Op. Corp., 326 Mass. 99 , 93 N.E. 2d 241 (1950); United Copper Securities Co. v. Amal. Copper Co., 244 U.S. 261 (1917); Post v. … Chidsey v.

In re United Security Trust Co.

20 Pa. D. & C. 78 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 11, 1933

Subsequently, the Mirkils drew upon Brown Brothers Harriman & Company under the said letters of credit for the full amount of $2,000, and the trust company closed before Brown Brothers Harriman & Company collected any of … He based his decision on Webb v.