Case law

Moore v. Caldwell

62 Pa. D. & C. 479 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Sep 25, 1947

In Brown v. McLanahan, 148 F. (2d) 703 (C. C. … See Mackin v. Nicollet Hotel, 25 F. (2d) 783 (C. C. A. 8th) ; Herman v. Dereszewski, 312 Mich. 244 , 20 N. W. (2d) 176 ;. Alderman v. Alderman, 178 S. C. 9, 105 A. L. R. 105; Hearst v. American Newspapers, 51 F.

In re Vitagraph, Inc.

11 Pa. D. & C. 45 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 28, 1928

In Nichols v. … Com. v. Quaker City Cab Co., 287 Pa. 161 .

Browning Estate

5 Pa. D. & C.3d 772 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 2, 1977

Angela O’Neill v. Charles W. Browning, was placed in evidence. … Browning is the father of claimant, Charles Wilson Browning, Jr., and on the basis of Trimble v.

Jones v. City of Philadelphia

68 Pa. D. & C.4th 47 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 30, 2004

Lindner v. Mollan, 544 Pa. 487 , 491 n.1, 677 A.2d 1194 , 1196 n.1 (1996); accord Weaver v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 688 A.2d 766 , 772 n.11 (Pa. Commw. 1997). … The Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public Education, 453 Pa. 584 , 305 A.2d 877 (1973), and in Mayle v.

Glassman v. Philadelphia

9 Pa. D. & C.2d 495 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 30, 1956

.” *503 Even if we were to consider ourselves bound by the decisions in Frame v. Felix, supra, and Taylor v. … In the case of Nippon Ki-Ito Kaisha, Ltd., v.

Jewelcor Management Inc. v. Thistle Group Holdings Co.

60 Pa. D. & C.4th 391 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 22, 2002

In contrast, the instant dispute involves why the board moved the meeting and how the board notified JMI of the changed meeting date. More on point than either Pennsylvania case is Schnell v. … Corp. v.

Commonwealth v. Philip Morris Inc.

40 Pa. D. & C.4th 225 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 26, 1999

See Brown, Administratrix of the Estate of Zimmerman v. Commonwealth, Liquor Control Board, 673 A.2d 21 (Pa. Commw. 1996), appeal denied, 546 Pa. 648 , 683 A.2d 886 (1996); Avrich v. … Super. 248 , 532 A.2d 882 (1987); Boyle v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, 151 Pa. Commw. 430 , 617 A.2d 70 (1992). In Brown, Administratrix of the Estate of Zimmerman v.

Johnson v. American Home Products Corp.

62 Pa. D. & C.4th 20 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 11, 2003

On March 12, 1999, said class action was certified. *25 Thereafter, the case of Brown v. … v.

Taylor v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.

60 Pa. D. & C.4th 218 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 7, 2001

Instead, it pointed to what it termed the Marras’ “insidious motive” and Brown v. Phillips, 365 Pa. 155, 159 , 74 A.2d 105, 108 (1950). … The Marras simply have obtained no unjust advantage. *223 SB cites Brown v.

Marra v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.

61 Pa. D. & C.4th 442 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 7, 2001

Instead, it pointed to what it termed the Marras’ “insidious motive” and Brown v. Phillips, 365 Pa. 155, 159 , 74 A.2d 105, 108 (1950). … SB cites Brown v. Phillips for the proposition that discontinuing suit for the purpose of recommencing suit in a different forum is a per se cause to strike the discontinuance.

Vroom v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.

58 Pa. D. & C.4th 557 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 7, 2001

Instead, it pointed to what it termed Vroom’s “insidious motive” and Brown v. Phillips, 365 Pa. 155, 159 , 74 A.2d 105, 108 (1950). … Vroom simply has obtained no unjust advantage. *562 SB cites Brown v.

Chavis v. Lau

19 Pa. D. & C.4th 343 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 12, 1993

Plaintiff went on to clarify that this accident occurred: “On June Street right at the comer, near June and Brown ... I was walking west on Brown Street ... On the North side of Brown Street.” … Supp. at 600 , quoting Adler v. Sklaroff, supra.

De La Cuesta v. Insurance Co. of N. A.

136 Pa. 62 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 6, 1890

Brown v. McKinally, 1 Esp. Rep. 279. … Co. v.

Celenza v. Ruccia

23 Pa. D. & C. 393 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 2, 1935

Brown, Jr., J., This is a bill in equity for the partition of premises 5010-12 Lancaster Avenue and premises 5004 Thompson Street, Philadelphia. … There was testimony by Nicola Aquarola that he boarded with her for several years during which she had other boarders, varying in number between five and ten; by Domenico Finelli, that she kept boarders and had a grocery

Pinzhoffer v. Franzen

46 Pa. D. & C. 234 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 6, 1943

: Hill v. … Superior Ct. 217 ; Paulin v. Williams & Co., Inc., et al., 122 Pa. Superior Ct. 462; Ferrante v. Ferrante et al., 123 Pa. Superior Ct. 74 .

Smith v. Mid-States Equipment Service, Inc.

27 Pa. D. & C.2d 143 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 16, 1962

it will adopt”: Frick v. … There, in referring to the earlier cases of Kenley v. Kenley, 2 Yeates 207 , and Heffner v.

Lansinger Estate

74 Pa. D. & C.2d 520 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 3, 1976

It is well settled that an executor claiming more commissions than his share has the burden of proving his right: Weller v. Bell, 36 Luz. 225 (1940). … Where no steps are taken in the Orphans’ Court to correct the alleged failure of his co-executor, it must be concluded that the other co-executor did so acquiesce: Weller v. Bell, supra.

Griffin & Vose, Inc. v. Non-Metallic Minerals Corp.

50 Pa. D. & C. 516 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 25, 1944

. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co., 260 U. S. 516 (1923); Toledo Railways & Light Co. v. Hill et al., 244 U. S. 49, 53 (1917). … Three of the officers and two members of the board resided here and the stockholders’ and directors’ meetings were held here.

Ewell v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

4 Pa. D. & C. 455 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 13, 1924

as he may desire to take, and shall specify the findings of fact, if any, of the board, or of the referee, sustained by the board, which he alleges to be unsupported by competent evidence.” … NOTE. — See De Marko v. Hiller, 3 D. & C. 533; Neil v. Lee Tire and Rubber Co., 3 D. & C. 811.

Shelburne Sportswear, Inc. v. Philadelphia

33 Pa. D. & C.2d 287 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 28, 1964

The board rejected petitioner’s contention and imposed the mercantile tax on all of its receipts from Clover. In its opinion, the board stated: “. . . … It seems to this Court that this case is controlled by the principles stated in Philadelphia School District v. Frankford Grocery Co., 876 Pa. 542 (1954).