Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

1,317 results

1.29s

  • In re Cooperative Wage Fund

    65 Pa. D. & C. 274 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 21, 1948

    Brown, Jr., P. … Compare Rose v. Standard Trailer Co., Inc., supra, 243, 244 , and Peoples-Pittsburgh Transportation v. Pittsburgh United Corp., supra, 120 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vanderslice v. Moessner

    18 Pa. D. & C.3d 9 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 4, 1981

    In Markley v. Brown, 66 Lane. 301 (1978), plaintiff alleged bills which “may exceed Seven Hundred Fifty ($750.00) Dollars in the future.” Judge Paul A. … In Mabey v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sperling v. Euclid Building & Loan Ass'n

    16 Pa. D. & C. 487 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 21, 1932

    The defendant relies on the recent case of Brown v. … In Mercer v. Ambler Building and Loan Ass’n, 10 Pa. C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Integrity Trust Co. v. Fell

    17 Pa. D. & C. 97 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Aug 26, 1932

    Brown, Jr., J., — The board of revision of taxes assessed •plaintiff’s property at the corner of Hortter and Greene Streets, Philadelphia, for the year 1932 in the sum of $325,000. … R. 688, 689; Com. v. Hanna, 17 Dist. R. 308, 311, 312.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Philadelphia, Department of Revenue v. Tax Review Board ex rel. Temple University

    30 Pa. D. & C.4th 248 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 13, 1996

    In City of Philadelphia, Philadelphia Police Dept. v. Philadelphia Board of Licensing & Inspection Review, 669 A.2d 460 (Pa. … Philadelphia Tax Review Board, finding of fact 2. . Id. at finding of fact 3. . Philadelphia Tax Review Board, findings of fact at conclusions of law. . Insinger Machine Co. v. Philadelphia Tax Review Board, 165 Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bell Telephone Co. v. Schwab

    33 Pa. D. & C. 270 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Aug 22, 1938

    On October 6, 1936, said directors resigned and a new board was elected immediately. 9. The new board appointed Joseph Schwab, husband of defendant, general manager of the company. 10. … Assn. v. Ankele et al., 117 Pa. Superior Ct. 45, 53 (1935), even an insolvent “debtor may prefer one creditor to another, and such preference is not fraudulent either in law or in fact: Brown’s Appeal, supra; Werner v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lipshutz v. St. Monica Manor

    33 Pa. D. & C.5th 438 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 16, 2013

    In Marmet Healthcare Center, Inc. v. Brown, 21 the U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled that the FAA contains no exception for personal injury or wrongful death claims against nursing homes. … Marmet Healthcare Center, Inc. v. Brown, 132 S. Ct. 1201 (2012); AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740 (2011); Buckeye Check Cashing Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lieberman v. Howard Johnson's, Inc.

    68 Pa. D. & C.2d 179 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 29, 1973

    York v. … Brown, 109 Pitts. L.J. 435, 436 (1961). See also Robinson Township School District v. Houghton, 387 Pa. 236, 241 (1956).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mount Vernon Corp. v. Revenue Commissioner

    11 Pa. D. & C.2d 479 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 23, 1957

    Brown, P. J., This is an appeal from the Tax Review Board of the City of Philadelphia. … Mount Vernon Corporation, appellant, petitioned the board for a review of a disputed assessment of the mercantile license tax for the years 1953 and 1954.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Socha v. Metz

    9 Pa. D. & C.2d 315 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 8, 1955

    In McIntyre v. … (Maio v. Fahs, supra; Jackson v. Gleason, 320 Pa. 545 ; Shaull v. A. S. Beck, etc., 369 Pa. 112 ; Murray v. Lavinsky, 120 Pa. Superior Ct. 392 ), or against the employer as defendant (McIntyre v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ganoe v. Trident Corp.

    72 Pa. D. & C.2d 750 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 10, 1975

    In short, a discontinuance will not be permitted to stand if it would be prejudicial in any way to the rights of others: Bily v. … Allegheny County Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review, 353 Pa. 49 , 44 A. 2d 250 (1945); Brown v. T. W. Phillips Gas & Oil Co., 365 Pa. 155 , 74 A. 2d 105 (1950); Leibowitz v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Millhouse

    34 Pa. D. & C.2d 693 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 29, 1964

    Protesting groups seeking integration had asked the board, without tangible result, to transport the overflow by bus to a predominantly white school which had space available. … Ten years ago, in an epochal decision, the United States Supreme Court declared illegal a State’s deliberate policy of racial segregation in public schools: Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth ex rel. Markovitz v. Trans-United Industries, Inc.

    23 Pa. D. & C.2d 571 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 27, 1961

    Brown, Jr., P. J., This is an action in quo warranto brought by Victor S. Markovitz against Trans-United Industries, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, and Frank Brus, Louis J. DiSalle, Joseph H. … Morris v. Stevens, 168 Pa. 582, 600 . Thus, it is clear that it is not only the person who claims to be entitled to the office who may institute the proceedings, but a stockholder as well: Commonwealth v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cruz v. Northeastern Hospital

    54 Pa. D. & C.4th 8 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 11, 2001

    Brown, Dr. Cohen, Dr. Koffler and Dr. … Brown, Dr. Cohen, Dr. Koffler and Dr. Buchanan It was not error to permit Dr. Brown, Dr. Cohen, Dr. Koffler and Dr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Provident Trust Co. v. Crouse

    40 Pa. D. & C. 628 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 13, 1941

    The sale has been authorized by the shareholders and the board of directors. There was no evidence of bad faith, fraud, or illegality. … Wilson-Cass Co., 134 Pa. 348 (1890); Wilson v. Brown, 269 Pa. 225 (1920); Carville v. A. F. Bornot & Co., 288 Pa. 104, 108 (1927); Culp v. Independent Card Corp., 99 Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Van Loan v. Septa

    8 Pa. D. & C.3d 25 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 3, 1977

    board committed an error of law: Zacek v. … Commonwealth Ct. 199 , 359 A. 2d 842 (1976); Com., Bureau of Occupational Injury and Disease Compensation v. Brown, 16 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 148 , 329 A. 2d 541 (1974); Crandall v. Downingtown Iron Works, 188 Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Ayala

    8 Pa. D. & C.3d 712 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Sep 12, 1978

    See also Griffin v. Harris, 571 F. 2d 767 (3d Cir. 1978); Brown v. Lynn, 385 F. Supp. 986 (N.D. Ill. 1974). … Ministers and Missionaries Benefit Board of the American Baptist Churches v. Goldsworthy, 253, Pa. Superior Ct. 321, 385 A. 2d *719 358 (1978); See also, General Electric Credit Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Niblo v. City of Philadelphia

    18 Pa. D. & C. 79 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 7, 1933

    Brown, Jr., J., Plaintiff has demurred to defendant’s return to a writ of alternative mandamus issued upon his petition to be designated as a patrolman of the Bureau of Police, Department of Public Safety of Philadelphia. … One week after the rules have been adopted, printed and *81 posted on such official bulletin board, such rules shall take effect and shall have the force of law.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bradley v. Cool

    18 Pa. D. & C. 404 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 17, 1932

    But plaintiff did not agree to furnish Cool with any goods nor with board and lodging, which might be regarded as necessaries. … A minor “can only appear by a general guardian or one ad litem: Mitchell v. Spaulding, 206 Pa. 220 ; Manning v. Baylinson, 68 Pa. Superior Ct. 512 ; Ohlweiler v. Ohlweiler, 72 Pa. Superior Ct. 518 ; Kay v. Haupt, 63 Pa.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Betz

    21 Pa. D. & C. 357 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 9, 1934

    Brown, Jr., J., Exceptions filed to the master’s report recommending that the application for the charter be refused were argued before the court in banc. … purposes involving pecuniary profit to its members, and corporations which are subject to the supervision of the Department of Banking, the Insurance Department, the Public Service Commission, or the Water and Power Resources Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.