Case law

First Union Commercial Corp. v. Medical Management Services

47 Pa. D. & C.4th 382 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 26, 2000

Burger King Corp. v. … Schleifer v.

Rieger v. Pennsylvania Co.

37 Pa. D. & C. 619 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 2, 1940

The latter is necessarily limited in its duration and specific in its objects”: Porter et al. v. Murphy, 7 Ind. T. 395, 426 , 104 S. W. 658 ; United States v. Schlierhole, 137 Fed. 616 ; Tanner v. … Nor do we understand Edelman v. Board-man, Secy., etc., supra, to be an authority for so bizarre a doctrine.

C.J.M. v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia

67 Pa. D. & C.4th 474 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Aug 13, 2004

Our Supreme Court’s decision in Dalrymple v. Brown, 549 Pa. 217 , 701 A.2d 164 (1997), is highly instructive. … Archdiocese of Philadelphia , no. 0405-1436; Downing v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, no. 0405-1439; Walsh v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, no. 0405-1440; Meehan v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, no. 0405-1441; Doe 3 v.

Burton v. Terry

7 Pa. D. & C.4th 603 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 12, 1990

At the trial, the city argues that Mascaro v. … In a subsequent case, Herman v. Greene County Fair Board, 112 Pa. Commw. 615 , 535 A.2d 1251 (1988), the court stated that the analysis in Mascaro applies to all eight exceptions of immunity under 42 Pa.C.S. §8542.

Bucci v. Cunard Line Ltd.

35 Pa. D. & C.3d 228 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 13, 1985

Simon v. … Indeed, Cunard, in its brief, acknowledges that “all of those on the QE2 underwent the same experience, i.e., they were all board the same vessel at the time of the power failure . . . (Emphasis added).”

Commonwealth v. Appolloni

34 Pa. D. & C.2d 183 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 22, 1964

Szal, a member of the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, about a number of complaints including amenorrhea. Dr. … Compare I v. D, 60 N. J. Super. 211, 158 A. 2d 716 (1960); State ex rel. Love v. Jones, 98 Ohio App. 45 , 128 N. E. 2d 228 (1953); Roberts v. State, 113 Okla. 150 , 240 P. 2d 104 (1952); State v.

Schumacher v. Swartz

68 Pa. D. & C. 3 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 15, 1948

See Baker v. Irish, 172 Pa. 528, 532 (1896), Veit v. Class and Nachod Brewing Company, 216 Pa. 29, 33 (1906), Wyatt v. Russell, 308 Pa. 366, 369 (1932), Artman v. Stanford, 93 Pa. … Also distinguishable are cases dealing with identification by physical characteristics, e.g., Brown v. Commonwealth, 76 Pa. 319, 338 (1874).

Shotz v. Sherzer

1 Pa. D. & C.2d 568 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Aug 30, 1954

See Lake v. Thompson, 366 Pa. 352, 357 ; Suraci v. Ball, 160 Pa. Superior Ct. 349 . … Woldow v. Dever, 374 Pa. 370, 374 . The case is, therefore, quite different from Abrams, Inc., v.

Mortimer v. City of Philadelphia

14 Pa. D. & C.2d 376 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Aug 23, 1957

In Downing v. … -400 of the Home Rule Charter provides for the preparation of civil service regulations and for position classification by the personnel director, with the approval of the civil service commission and the administrative board

Steel Estate

49 Pa. D. & C.2d 20 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 27, 1970

clause, to modify the *30 absolute gift, and by so modifying it makes it in part too remote, the entire modification will be rejected, and the original absolute gift stands: Gray, The Rule Against Perpetuities (Little, Brown … However, consideration must be given to “. . . what the testator understood to be the legal meaning of his language at the time he used it”: Hood v.

Klauder v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.

66 Pa. D. & C.2d 271 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 15, 1973

Schonek v. W. J. A. C., Inc., supra; Fisher v. Leader Publishing Co., 239 Pa. 200 , 86 Atl. 776 (1913). Also instructive is Scelfo v. Rutgers University, 116 N. J. … When the group *278 becomes smaller than that, as in the case of a jury, a family, an election board, or the four officers of an association, the courts have been willing to permit the conclusion that the finger of defamation

In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Litigation

69 Pa. D. & C.4th 320 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Sep 2, 2003

The Track court reviewed a dissent by Justice Castille in the case of Blum v. … The court also cited the case of Ferebee v. Chevron Chemical Co., 736 F.2d 1529 (D.C.

Comer v. Comer

16 Pa. D. & C.3d 627 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 11, 1979

In the event that any future regulation of the Board of Internal Revenue precludes the inclusion of alimony as a proper deduction as set forth in the present existing Internal Revenue Code, husband’s obligation hereunder … There is precedent as to the method to be used, although the action was in assumpsit, in the case of McGee v. McGee, 179 Pa. Superior Ct. 361 , 115 A. 2d 409 (1955).

Tschan v. Snyder

7 Pa. D. & C.3d 499 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 3, 1977

Decedent was himself a medical doctor, board certified in dermatology, who was having dental work done by defendant, Dr. David Snyder, an endodontist, and Dr. Arthur Hattler, a periodontist. *500 In April, 1967, Dr. … Mochen v. State, supra, at 294 . See also, Davis v. Feinstein, 370 Pa. 449 , 88 A. 2d 695 (1952). “27.

Paustian v. Pennsylvania Convention Center Authority

3 Pa. D. & C.4th 16 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 19, 1988

App. 1969); 508 Chestnut Inc. v. City of St. Louis, 389 S.W.2d 823 (Mo. Ct. App.), appeal dismissed, 382 U.S. 203 (1065); Bailey v. Muskegon County Board of Commissioners, 122 Mich. App. 808 , 333 N.W.2d 144 (1983). … Attorney General of New York v. Soto-Lopez, 476 U.S. 898 , 106 S.Ct. 2317 (1986); Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618, 630-1 , 89 S.Ct. 1322, 1329-30 (1969); Dunn v.

Valerio v. Keystone Turf Club Inc.

41 Pa. D. & C.4th 353 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 17, 1999

Majdic v. Cincinnati Machine Company, 370 Pa. Super. 611, 621 , 537 A.2d 334, 339 (1988) (citing Cummings v. Borough of Nazareth, 430 Pa. 255 , 242 A.2d 460 (1968); Walheim v. Kirkpatrick, 305 Pa. … V.

Korn v. Avis-Rent-a-Car System, Inc.

8 Pa. D. & C.3d 655 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 21, 1977

In this Commonwealth “[t]rial courts are vested with board discretion in determining . . . the propriety of maintaining the action on behalf of the class.” Klemow v. Time Inc., supra, 466 Pa. 197 , 352 A. 2d at 16 . … Thomas v. Seamans, 451 Pa. 347 , 304 A. 2d 134 (1973); Savitz v. Weinstein, 395 Pa. 173 , 149 A. 2d 110 (1959); Edelson v. Bernstein, 382 Pa. 392 , 115 A. 2d 382 (1955).

In re United Security Trust Co.

19 Pa. D. & C. 303 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 8, 1933

Section 13(a) of the Act of 1931 provides as follows: “When the drawee or payor, or any other agent collecting bank, shall fail or be closed for business by the Secretary of Banking, or by action of the board of directors … In the cases of Hackett v. Reynolds, Lamberton & Co., 114 Pa. 328 , First National Bank of Clarion v. Gregg & Co., 79 Pa. 384 , and Jones & Co. v.

Kayser v. Pennsylvania Railroad

10 Pa. D. & C. 799 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 23, 1928

On the other hand, it has been held that the act of the starter of a trolley company stationed at a particular point in the line, who, within the scope of his authority, interferes with a passenger attempting to board a car … Superior Ct. 616 ; Duggan v. B. & O. R. R. Co., 159 Pa. 248 ; McFarlan v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 199 Pa. 408 ; Dunne v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 249 Pa. 76 , and Keidel v. B. & O. R. R.

CCI Communications, Inc. v. Richard F. Sassa Insurance Agency

33 Pa. D. & C.5th 463 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Aug 30, 2013

CCI Communications, Inc. v. Richard F. Sassa Insurance Agency, Inc., No. 3253 EDA 2011 (Nov. 20, 2012), mem. per curiam, p.6-7 (“Superior Ct. op.”) . Id. at 8 n.6. . Third am. compl. ¶5. . … Dalrymple v. Brown, 549 Pa. 217, 223 , 701 A.2d 164, 167 (1997) . Id. (citation omitted). . Id. . Baumgart v. Keene Bldg. Prods. Corp., 468 A.2d 468, 471 (Pa. 1983). . Cooper v. Sirota, 37 F.