Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

1,317 results

1.49s

  • Chambliss v. City of Philadelphia

    45 Pa. D. & C.3d 212 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 20, 1986

    Fischer v. Dept. of Public Welfare, 85 Pa. Commw. 240 , 482 A.2d 1148, 1159 (1984), aff'd, 509 Pa. 293 , 502 A.2d 114 (1985). … Snepp v. United States, 444 U.S. 507 , 62 L.Ed. 2d 704 (1980).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Davenport

    68 Pa. D. & C.2d 21 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 30, 1974

    In Commonwealth v. … They observed the above named Samuel Davenport walking on highway Broad and Brown Streets, and noticed that he fit the description.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kennedy Mortgage Co. v. Washington

    12 Pa. D. & C.3d 476 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 23, 1979

    See Fidelity Bond and Mortgage v. Clark, 7 D. & C. 3d 742 (Prattis, J., 1978). The Act of 1974 was expressly designed to prevent such an onerous situation. In Ministers and Missionaries Benefit Board v. … Salmon Building & Loan Asso. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Toledo v. Medical Engineering Corp.

    50 Pa. D. & C.4th 129 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 29, 2000

    SUMMARY OF THE LAW On December 22,2000, in Blum v. … Professor of Pathology Yale University School of Medicine” V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. McGill

    42 Pa. D. & C. 74 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 29, 1940

    See Burke et al. v. … In equity the relief to be granted is governed by conditions existing at the time of the decree: Randel v. Brown, 2 How. (U. S.) 406 (1844); 8 Stand. Pa. Prac., p. 266.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Herman Goldner Co. v. Cimco Lewis Industries

    58 Pa. D. & C.4th 173 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 19, 2002

    Inc. v. … Goldsborough v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Adams v. Nicholas

    1 Miles 90 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 21, 1835

    Subsequent, decisions are not authority, but it may not, be amiss to observe, that none of these (unless Hill v. Chapman, 2 Brown’s C. … Malson v. Fry, 1 Watts 433 ; Star v. Bradford, 2 Penns. Rep. 398; Jackson v. Betts, 9 Cowen 225; Fox v. Clifton, 9 Bing. 115; 23 E. C. L. Rep. 274; Rung v. Shoneberger, 2 Watts 27 ; Weidler v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Coty, Inc. v. Sun Ray Drug Co.

    14 Pa. D. & C. 499 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 7, 1931

    The highest *503 court of the United States has repeatedly held that good-will constitutes a property right which the courts will protect: Metropolitan National Bank v. St. Louis Dispatch Co., 149 U. S. 436 . … See, also, Sawilowsky v. Brown, 288 Fed. Repr. 533.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • IEJ Corporation v. Laserow

    75 Pa. D. & C.4th 138 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 25, 2005

    Colonna v. Rice, 445 Pa. Super. 1 , 664 A.2d 979 (1995). … If you do not agree with this assessment, you must file a petition before the Tax Review Board within 60 days after the mailing of the enclosed bill.” (Exhibit “C”.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Meyer v. Industrial Valley Bank & Trust Co.

    44 Pa. D. & C.2d 295 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 3, 1967

    A case very similar to the instant case is that of Leeds v. Perpetual Building and Loan Assn., 61 Pa. … The extent of the duty of inquiry of one dealing with an apparent agent in this situation was amply set forth by the Supreme Court in Browne v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ryce v. Ryce

    15 Pa. D. & C.2d 126 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 13, 1958

    Zoning Board of Adjustment, *130 374 Pa. 277 . An after-discovered fraud on the court is another instance of a circumstance which could provide a basis upon which a court might act. … Plaintiff’s complaint in divorce a. v. m. is dismissed. Let decree in annulment issue.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Morton Estate

    59 Pa. D. & C.2d 300 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 16, 1972

    The rule of Harrah Estate, which followed in essence the holding of the English Court of Chancery in the case of Cattlin v. Brown, 11 Hare 372, 68 Eng. … Robinson stated the rule which was followed generally until the separability construction in Cattlin v. Brown, supra, gained judicial favor.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • King v. Swartz Manufacturing Co.

    1 Pa. D. & C. 182 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 24, 1922

    In Heinz v. … To the same effect is Brown v. Seidel, 153 Pa. 60 . So, also, Kann v. Diamond Steel Co., 89 Fed. Repr. 706.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cooper Estate

    48 Pa. D. & C.2d 404 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 15, 1970

    On November 25, 1968, the Inheritance Tax Protest Board of the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue denied the protest and ruled that the items were taxable for inheritance tax purposes as being made in contemplation of death … The comment to this section states that the definition of a transfer made in contemplation of death is suggested by United States v. Wells, 283 U. S. 102 , and Estate of Johnson, 10 T.C. 680 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brusbard's Estate

    34 Pa. D. & C. 107 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 16, 1938

    See Directors of the Poor, etc., v. Nyce, etc., 161 Pa. 82 . … See in this connection Spicer v. Smith, etc., 288 U. S. 430 , Pentz v. First National Bank, 75 Pa. Superior Ct. 1 , and Saxe v. Board of Revision of Taxes, etc., 107 Pa. Superior Ct. 108 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gay Estate

    12 Pa. D. & C.3d 610 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Sep 27, 1979

    declaratory judgment action, permitted a guardian to file *615 an intention on the incompetent’s behalf to retire, to apply for a retirement allowance, and to elect the manner in which the allowance was to be paid: Moorehead v. … Northumberland County Retirement Board, 86 D. & C. 283 (1953).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Focht v. Bryn Mawr Hospital

    16 Pa. D. & C.4th 150 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 22, 1992

    Unisys Corporation v. Ameritif Corporation, No. 92-1966, slip op. at 7 (E.D. Pa. August 19, 1992) (citing INA Underwriters v. Nalibotsky, 594 F. Supp. 1199 (E.D. Pa. 1984)). … See Silver Chrysler Plymouth Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rose Estate

    69 Pa. D. & C.2d 20 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 19, 1975

    See Godina v. Oswald, 206 Pa. … In Sheffit v. Koff, 175 Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Weisbord Estate

    6 Pa. D. & C.3d 560 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 31, 1975

    resolved that all orphans’ court division rules pertaining to admission, conduct, practice and discipline of counsel should be deleted and in their place these matters should be governed by the rules *565 adopted by the Board … ‘Taxes *566 are what we pay for civilized society’: Compañia General v. Collector, 275 U.S. 87 (Holmes, J., dissenting, page 99, 100 (1927)).”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Milkman v. American Travellers Life Insurance

    61 Pa. D. & C.4th 502 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 28, 2002

    See e.g., Williams v. … The second affidavit, dated February 14, 2002, is also from Professor Browne and provides updated information to support a settlement valuation of $34.7 million. .

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.