Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

1,317 results

2.72s

  • Warrick v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    77 Pa. D. & C. 396 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 19, 1951

    Then if the court acts upon the motion by dismissing it, it would bar a second suit: Fleming v. Insurance Company of Pennsylvania, 6 Pa. L. J. 373; Fine v. Soifer, 288 Pa. 164, 173 . … Reinecker did not conclude appellant’s rights since the board entertained the second appeal and decided it on its merits.” In Triolo et al. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lycoming House v. Board of Revision

    64 Pa. D. & C. 42 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Sep 14, 1948

    Justice Mitchell in Contributors to Pennsylvania Hospital v. … Hospital, 154 Pa. 9 ; House of Refuge v. Smith, 140 Pa. 387 .” See also County of Lancaster v. Y.W.C.A., 92 Pa. Superior Ct. 514 ; United Presbyterian Women’s Association of North America v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dobison v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    87 Pa. D. & C. 172 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 5, 1953

    See Euclid v. Ambler, 272 U. S. 365 . … See Alden Park Corporation v. Zoning Board, 84 D. & C. 40.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Triolo v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    59 Pa. D. & C. 211 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 18, 1946

    Our construction is in accord with that of our colleagues in the Court of Common Pleas No. 1 of Philadelphia County, wherein the same question was presented in Giunta et al. v. McLaughlin et al., 30 D. & C. 644 (1937). … the order of the board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Allen v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    56 Pa. D. & C. 402 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 8, 1946

    The court held that the grant of the certificate for a period of one year lay within the discretion of the board and the order was affirmed. An appeal was then taken to the Superior Court in the case of Gish et al. v. … In Gish et al. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Theresa Friedman & Sons, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    20 Pa. D. & C.2d 149 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 3, 1959

    The zoning board of adjustment denied the application and this appeal followed. … It appears from a statement of the board chairman, contained in the notes of testimony, that on February 17, 1955, the board approved the erection of an addition, an extension to the then existing preserve processing plant

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hebden v. George Salls Metals, Inc.

    14 Pa. D. & C.2d 80 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 16, 1958

    Appellant relies upon the case of Brown v. State Workmen’s Insurance Fund, 131 Pa. … Furthermore, the Brown case, supra, in citing the case of Sustar v. Penn Smokeless Coal Co., 85 Pa.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Democratic County Executive Committee v. County Board of Elections

    31 Pa. D. & C.2d 434 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 20, 1963

    This is provided for by the Party Raiding Act which was held to be constitutional in the case of Krull v. City and County of Philadelphia, 2 D. & C. 2d 181. … Said persons are directed to forthwith surrender to the County Board of Elections of Philadelphia any watcher’s certificates they may have received prior to this order and the County Board of Elections of Philadelphia is

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Backman v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

    1 Pa. D. & C. 105 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 4, 1922

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ginivi Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    59 Pa. D. & C.4th 499 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 18, 2002

    .”); see also, Commonwealth v. … See SWZ Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of City of Ft. Worth, 985 S.W.2d 268 (Tex.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • CMJ Sheffield, Inc. v. Pa. Liquor Control Board

    42 Pa. D. & C.5th 225 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 17, 2014

    Colville v. Allegheny County Retirement Board, 926 A.2d 426 (Pa. 2007). As a note, this is not a “relitigation” of the citations, but an appeal from the decision not to renew appellant’s liquor license. … Renewal of a liquor license is not automatic and the board may refuse to renew a license for several reasons, including because the licensee has one or more adjudicated citations. Goodfellas, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sameric Corp. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    65 Pa. D. & C.2d 632 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 17, 1974

    In Markey v. … See also Del Guercio v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 409 Pa. 457 , 187 A. 2d 165 (1963).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Norcross, Inc. v. Philadelphia Tax Review Board

    48 Pa. D. & C.2d 25 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Aug 6, 1969

    Co., 288 Pa. 240 (1927); Lutz v. Foster *29 & Kester, Inc., 367 Pa. 125 (1951); Motch & Merryweather Machinery Co. v. Pittsburgh School District, 381 Pa. 619 (1955); Alan Wood Steel Company v. … See Lutz v. Foster & Kester Co., Inc., supra.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Denro Corp. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    46 Pa. D. & C.2d 79 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 10, 1968

    The board denied the application, and this appeal followed. * A court may not upset the board’s decision unless the court finds in the board’s action either a manifest abuse of discretion or an error of law: Coleman v. … In Baranoff v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of License & Inspection Review v. Pemberton

    40 Pa. D. & C.2d 391 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 10, 1966

    error of law: Blumenschein v. … Philadelphia v. Walnut Street Three R Corp., 26 D. & C. 2d 446 (C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., 1961).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Colin v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment

    10 Pa. D. & C.3d 444 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 8, 1979

    Pittsburgh Board of Adjustment, 437 Pa. 481 , 263 A. 2d 426 (1970); Pfile v. Borough of Speers, 7 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 226 , 298 A. 2d 598 (1972). … Zoning Hearing Board v. Konyk, 5 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 466, 471 , 290 A. 2d 715 (1972).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Littlepage v. Board of License & Inspection Review

    39 Pa. D. & C.3d 267 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Aug 21, 1985

    See, also, Board of Pensions and Retirement v. Einhorn, 65 Pa. Commw. 144 , 442 A.2d 21, 23 (1982). … See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Rudy, 4 Adams L.J. 57 (1961); Liquor Control Board v. Pope, 89 Dauph. 106 (1968). In the present case, Littlepage’s license was revoked pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. §6109(d) which provides: “(d).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Straessle v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment

    71 Pa. D. & C. 266 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 15, 1950

    Brown then took an appeal to the zoning board of adjustment. … Brown.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chatfield v. Board of Revision of Taxes

    43 Pa. D. & C. 274 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 17, 1941

    R. v. Balthaser, 119 Pa. 472 ; Penna., etc., R. R. Co. v. Cleary, 125 Pa. 442 ; Kossler v. Pittsburgh, etc., Ry. Co., 208 Pa. 50 ; Hamory v. Penna., etc., R. R. Co., 222 Pa. 631 ; Kleppner v. Pittsburg, etc., R. R. … Co. v. Fortney, 90 Pa. 323, 328 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kellman v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment

    75 Pa. D. & C. 504 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 8, 1951

    Flood, J., This case has been twice before the zoning board and twice before us. We regret that we must return it to the board again. … The seventh question raises an issue similar to that passed upon by us in the case of Drake v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 65 D. & C. 293, 296 (1948).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.