Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspacommwct

10,000+ results

0.60s

  • Rood v. Commonwealth

    50 Pa. Commw. 584 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1980

    In Trella v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 10 Pa. … In Wolford v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 35 Pa.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • May v. Commonwealth

    39 Pa. Commw. 507 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1979

    It is axiomatic that the resolution of conflicts in the evidence and the assessment of the credibility of the witnesses are matters for the Board. Geesey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 33 Pa. … Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Jones, 23 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 451 , 352 A.2d 574 (1976).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Musguire v. Commonwealth

    52 Pa. Commw. 137 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 1980

    Lee v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 42 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 461, 463 , 401 A.2d 12, 13 (1979); Correa v. Unemployment Compensation Board, of Review, 31 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 13 , 374 A.2d 1017 (1977). … Although not controlling here, in Shaw v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Pa.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Rettan v. Commonwealth

    15 Pa. Commw. 287 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1974

    Our scope of review in unemployment cases is confined to questions of law and, absent fraud, a determination as to whether the Board’s findings are supported by the evidence. Shira v. … In its decision, the Board specifically refers to “subsequent evidence” coming to the Board’s attention relative to Rettan’s fail *291 ure to keep an eye appointment arranged by Public Assistance authorities.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Druzak v. Commonwealth

    12 Pa. Commw. 481 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1974

    Under the circumstances in this case, we must agree with the Board, the Referee, and the Bureau, that it was misconduct and we, therefore, affirm. … See Judge Mencer’s Opinion in Harbutz v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 10 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 235 , 309 A. 2d 840 (1973).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Commonwealth

    34 Pa. Commw. 640 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 1978

    . *643 Azar v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 34 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 23 , 382 A.2d 995 (1978); Chiango v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 33 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 610 , 382 A.2d 789 (1978). … The presence of such an instruction distinguishes this case from Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Bacon, 25 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 583 , 361 A.2d 505 (1976), and Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bilsing v. Commonwealth

    34 Pa. Commw. 199 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 2, 1978

    The Board of Review affirmed the referee’s decision without comment. … Order And Now, this 2nd day of March, 1978, the Board of Beview’s decision appealed from is set aside and the record is remanded for further hearing and disposition consistent with this opinion.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Wincek v. Commonwealth

    64 Pa. Commw. 201 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 20, 1982

    Molnar v. Unem *205 ployment Compensation Board of Review, supra; Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Shrump, 22 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 570 , 349 A.2d 787 (1975); Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. … Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, supra; Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Patsy, supra; Baker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, supra. For example in Chapman v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • C. Byfield v. WCAB (Philadelphia Housing Authority)

    143 A.3d 1063 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 26, 2016

    Relying on Drozd v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (The Lion, Inc.), 485 A.2d 96 (Pa. … Mason v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Baillie v. Commonwealth

    51 Pa. Commw. 181 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 6, 1980

    McLean v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 476 Pa. 617 , 383 A.2d 533 (1978); Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 466 Pa. 81 , 351 A.2d 631 (1976). … Hughes v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 40 Pa.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Zazo v. Commonwealth

    80 Pa. Commw. 198 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 8, 1984

    S. §704; Washington v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 73 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 432 , 458 A.2d 645 (1983). … Commonwealth v. Dorian, Pa. , A.2d (Nos. 189 and 193 Western District Allocatur Docket, filed December 27, 1983); see also Rivera v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 79 Pa.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Howard v. Commonwealth

    32 Pa. Commw. 512 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 28, 1977

    Brennan v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 17 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 569 , 333 A.2d 794 (1975). … Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 466 Pa. 81 , 351 A.2d 631 (1976).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Maiorana v. Commonwealth

    70 Pa. Commw. 614 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1982

    Summers v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 60 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 146 , 430 A.2d 1046 (1981). … Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Sanchez, 21 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 353 , 346 A.2d 390 (1975).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Jordan v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

    206 A.3d 655 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 2019

    Here, Jordan did not post bail, and therefore, he was held on the new criminal charges and the Board’s detainer. C.R. at 40. In Gaito v. … Id. at 571 (emphasis added); see also Smith v. Pa.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Santo v. Commonwealth

    130 Pa. Commw. 330 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1989

    The Board disposed of these appeals consecutively; they were consolidated for appeal to this Court. . … Under 20 C.F.R. § 617.3 (v), " ‘[i]mpact date’ means the date stated in a certification issued under the Act on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin in a firm or a subdivision of a firm.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Enckler v. B. Altman & Co.

    19 Pa. Commw. 172 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 22, 1975

    Pomeroy’s Inc. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 15 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 270, 325 A.2d 349 (1974). The issue on appeal is whether there was sufficient competent evidence to support the findings of the Board. … Hence, the Board, as final arbiter of the facts, could have properly changed that finding of fact without having taken additional evidence. See Brown v. Atlantic and Gulf Stevedores, Inc., 2 Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dingel v. Commonwealth

    14 Pa. Commw. 484 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 26, 1974

    Shira v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 10 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 457 , 310 A. 2d 708 (1973). Applying these rules to the case at hand, we must affirm the Board’s findings. … Kanouse v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 9 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 188 , 305 A. 2d 782 (1973).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Commonwealth

    32 Pa. Commw. 641 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1977

    Meneely v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 28 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 613, 369 A.2d 506 (1977). Smith, v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 28 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 98 , 367 A.2d 811 (1977). Beville v. … Powell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 31 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 512 , 377 A.2d 206 (1977) ; Leonhart, supra; Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Holley, 24 Pa.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Urista v. Commonwealth

    56 Pa. Commw. 618 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 1981

    Eckenrod v. Unemploymen t Compensation Board of Review, 15 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 166 , 325 A.2d 320 (1974). We will therefore affirm the Board's order denying benefits. … Superior Ct. 294 , 111 A.2d 174 (1955); Myers v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 17 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 281 , 330 A.2d 886 (1975).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Levato v. Commonwealth

    73 Pa. Commw. 518 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1983

    Section 477.1, 71 P.S. §180-7.1 creates the board and Section 477.2, 71 P.S. §180-7.2 confers on the board the power to hear and determine claims for compensation and to hold hearings thereon. … The board’s only other asserted justification for its determination is the case of Gloecki v. Pennsylvania Crime Victim’s Compensation Board, 57 Pa.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.