Case law

Haines v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

60 Pa. Commw. 539 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 1981

Robinson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 51 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 72 , 414 A.2d 143 (1980). Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the board. … Brooks v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 37 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 6 , 388 A.2d 799 (1978). The testimony was: AEW2: We found him intoxicated in the booth a couple different time.

Chester Community Charter School v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

74 A.3d 1143 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 2013

Snow v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 95 Pa.Cmwlth. 259 , 505 A.2d 383, 384 (1986); Haynes v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 65 Pa.Cmwlth. 541 , 442 A.2d 1232, 1233 (1982). … Under the Law, the Board is the ultimate fact finder, not the Referee. Peak v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 509 Pa. 267, 276-77 , 501 A.2d 1383, 1388 (1985).

Feeko v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

59 Pa. Commw. 517 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 1981

This clearly is conduct in disregard of standards of behavior which Feeko’s employer can rightfully expect. 2 Kentucky Fried Chicken of Altoona, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 10 Pa. … Pennsylvania Engineering Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 46 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 305 , 405 A.2d 1387 (1979).

Hanson v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

59 Pa. Commw. 382 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 1981

In Reardon v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 30 Pa. … Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the board. Order And Now, June 1,1981, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review is hereby affirmed. David B. Hanson. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review.

Smith v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

59 Pa. Commw. 171 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 6, 1981

Good cause has been found in cases where the claimant established that his transportation failed, Pettey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 15 Pa. … Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 466 Pa. 81 , 351 A.2d 631 (1976).

Slavin v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

57 Pa. Commw. 456 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1981

The referee and the Board, relying on a decision of this Court in Leary v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 14 Pa. … Ordeb And Now, this 12th day of March, 1981, the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, affirming the denial of benefits to James J.

Pennalan Corp. v. Fayette County Zoning Hearing Board

139 Pa. Commw. 554 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 7, 1991

West Goshen Township v. Crater, 114 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 245, 538 A.2d 952 (1988). … Pennalan Corporation v. Zoning Hearing Board of Fayette County, —D. & C. 4th-(No. 640 of 1989, G.D., filed August 15, 1990). 1 Affirmed. BYER, J., dissents.

King v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Snyder's of Hanover)

713 A.2d 113 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 1998

In Yantos v. … In Keilbach v.

McAloon v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

53 Pa. Commw. 404 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 8, 1980

Opinion by Judge MacPhail, John McAloon (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Review Board (Board) denying him benefits pursuant to Section 402(h) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December … Medoff v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 9 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 466 , 308 A.2d 185 (1973).

Bricker v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

134 Pa. Commw. 630 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 10, 1990

Commonwealth v. Bricker, 506 Pa. 571 , 487 A.2d 346 (1985). … In Epps v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 129 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 240, 565 A.2d 214 (1989), we discussed the manner in which counsel can obtain permission to withdraw from a case.

Dubb v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

36 Pa. Commw. 535 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1978

Mosley v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 15 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 447 , 327 A.2d 199 (1974). … Gensheimer v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 13 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 62 , 317 A.2d 350 (1974). The order of the Board is affirmed.

MacFarland Landscape Service v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

125 Pa. Commw. 284 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1989

Kubler v. Yeager, 189 Pa. Superior Ct. 339 , 150 A.2d 383 (1959); Diaz v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 170 Pa. Superior Ct. 608 , 88 A.2d 801 (1952). … See Universal Cyclops v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Krawczynski), 9 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 176 , 305 A.2d 757 (1973).

Eddy v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

111 Pa. Commw. 46 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 10, 1987

. 6 Hoover v. … See Hoover v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 97 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 414 , 509 A.2d 962 (1986).

Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Mrs. Paul's Kitchens

18 Pa. Commw. 498 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1975

Williams v. San Giorgio Macaroni, Inc., 13 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 386 388 , 319 A. 2d 434, 435 (1974). Was there sufficient competent evidence to support the referee’s finding? The short of it is, yes. … Appellant in reality questioned two findings made by the referee and adopted by the Board. These findings state: “3.

L & A Products v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

17 Pa. Commw. 467 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 1975

See Hinkle v. H. J. Heinz Company, 7 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 216 , 298 A. 2d 632 (1972). … Of course, it is for the referee to decide the credibility of the witnesses before him, and both the Board and this Court are bound by his determination. See Edison Hotel v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 11 Pa.

Board of Supervisors of Venango Township v. Radu

103 Pa. Commw. 363 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 1987

That section specifically states that, as used in the Code, “the term ‘board’ shall refer to a zoning hearing board.” … The trial court erred in compelling the Board of Supervisors to issue a deemed decision. See Russell v. Penn Township Planning Commission, 8 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 429 , 302 A.2d 870 (1973).

Fairchance Lumber Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

102 Pa. Commw. 487 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 1986

While Section 309(d) of the Act clearly provides for alternative methods of computation, see Miller v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Burnham Corp.), 72 Pa. … Lehman v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 64 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 381 , 439 A.2d 1362 (1982).

LaFramboise v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

117 Pa. Commw. 415 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1988

Adams v. Mackleer, 239 Pa. Superior Ct. 244 ; 361 A.2d 439 (1976), citing Beardsley v. Weaver, 402 Pa. 130 , 166 A.2d 529 (1961). … Claimant appealed, and after a remand hearing, the Board affirmed the decision of the referee. N.T. II at 5. N.T. II at 19-20. N.T. II at 6-8. N.T. 11 at 20. Claimant cites Frick v.

Yannone v. Commonwealth, Uemployment Compensation Board of Review

81 Pa. Commw. 572 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1984

Haggard v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 50 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 620 , 413 A.2d 478 (1980). … Eather, he stayed away because of an alleged threat which the referee and board did not find credible. See Stalc v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 13 Pa.

Smith v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

111 Pa. Commw. 100 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1987

Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 474 Pa. 351 , 370 A.2d 829 (1977). In the present case the Board relies on a mixture of hearsay and direct evidence to support its case. … Commonwealth Ct. 332 , 467 A.2d 648 (1983); Walker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 27 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 522 , 367 A.2d 366 (1976).