Case law

Presbyterian-University of Pennsylvania Medical Center v. Board of Revision of Taxes

24 Pa. Commw. 461 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 13, 1976

Allegheny General Hospital v. Board of Property Assessment Appeals and Review, Allegheny County, 207 Pa. Superior Ct. 266 , 217 A. 2d 796 (1966). … It has generally been held that the question of whether grounds are “necessary for the occupancy and enjoyment” of a charitable institution is one primarily for its governing board. Christian Literature Crusade, Inc. v.

Break N Eat Corp. v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

60 Pa. Commw. 13 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1981

Opinion by Judge Williams, Jr., This is an appeal by Break N Eat Corporation (employer) from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board), granting benefits to William Wiest after further consideration … The instant ease presents a similar if not stronger example of “good cause” for leaving employment than the standards set forth in Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 474 Pa. 351 , 378 A.2d 829 (1977).

Macy's Inc. v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals, Review of Allegheny County

61 A.3d 361 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 2013

Green v. … Parkview Court Associates v. Delaware County Board of Assessment Appeals, 959 A.2d 515 , 519 n. 8 (Pa.Cmwlth.2008) (citations omitted). . In Koppel Steel Corporation v.

Pereus Food Emporium, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

768 A.2d 1242 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 2001

Chadds Ford Tavern v. … In Re Giannilli v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 82 Pa.Cmwlth. 142 , 474 A.2d 738 (1984).

Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Hickory Farms of Ohio & Liberty Mutual Insurance

28 Pa. Commw. 30 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 1976

Ryb itski v. Lebowitz, 175 Pa. … Krchmar v. Oakland Beach Co., 155 Pa. Superior Ct. 430, 434 , 38 A.2d 710, 712 (1944).

Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board of the Commonwealth v. Calder Manufacturing Co.

21 Pa. Commw. 528 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 1975

Although we have recognized exceptions to this general principle in Riley Stoker Corporation v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 9 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 533 , 308 A.2d 205 (1973), and in United Metal Fabricators v. … We conclude with appropriate language of Judge Blatt in Royal Pioneer Ind., Inc. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 11 Pa.

American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

77 A.3d 53 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 1, 2013

It is the Board, not the hearing examiner, who is the ultimate fact finder, Xilas v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 65 Pa. … V.

LaFramboise v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

117 Pa. Commw. 415 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1988

Adams v. Mackleer, 239 Pa. Superior Ct. 244 ; 361 A.2d 439 (1976), citing Beardsley v. Weaver, 402 Pa. 130 , 166 A.2d 529 (1961). … Claimant appealed, and after a remand hearing, the Board affirmed the decision of the referee. N.T. II at 5. N.T. II at 19-20. N.T. II at 6-8. N.T. 11 at 20. Claimant cites Frick v.

Fondel v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

111 Pa. Commw. 123 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1987

Weight v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 81 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 354 , 473 A.2d 737 (1984). … Questions of credibility are within the exclusive province of the Board and are conclusive upon review to this court. Davis v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 105 Pa.

New Castle Area School District v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

159 Pa. Commw. 611 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 1993

Grimm v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 127 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 368, 377, 561 A.2d 1286, 1290 (1989). … Murdoca v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 122 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 303, 309, 551 A.2d 1157, 1160 (1988).

Bobchock v. Commonwealth

105 Pa. Commw. 645 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 6, 1987

Estate of McGovern v. State Employees’ Retirement Board, 512 Pa. 377 , 517 A.2d 523 (1986). Additionally, willful misconduct is a question of law subject to our review. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pa., Inc. v. … Erie Resistor Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 194 Pa. Superior Ct. 278 , 166 A.2d 96 (1961). See also Chapman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 86 Pa.

Shaffer v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

81 Pa. Commw. 308 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 1984

Shaffer, (Claimant), appeals from an order by the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board), affirming a decision by the referee which denied benefits to the Claimant. … Gillooly v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 76 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 20 , 462 A.2d 958 (1983).

Cole v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

75 Pa. Commw. 332 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1983

Martin v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 36 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 304 , 387 A.2d 998 (1978). … Melignano v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 48 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 180 , 409 A.2d 495 (1979); Geesey v. Unemployment Compensa *334 tion Board of Review, 33 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 376 , 381 A.2d 1343 (1978).

Ellis v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

75 Pa. Commw. 74 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 13, 1983

Gane v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 41 Pa. Commonwealth CSt. 292, 398 A.2d 1110 (1979). … Roman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 51 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 44, 413 A.2d 775 (1980).

Boboli Co./Phillip Morris v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

697 A.2d 600 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 10, 1997

See Fink v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Walbridge Corporation), 678 A.2d 853 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996) (en banc); Knapp v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (GTE), 671 A.2d 258 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996); Cox v. … Employer also argues incorrectly that the Board must be reversed pursuant to Inglis House v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Reedy), 535 Pa. 135 , 634 A.2d 592 (1993).

Sears v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

72 Pa. Commw. 517 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 1983

The referee’s decision, ,as adopted by the board, apparently holds that the claimant voluntarily quit, but characterizes the way she did it as “abandoning” the position. … Walker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 27 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 522 , 367 A.2d 366 (1976).

Dietz v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

72 Pa. Commw. 312 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 1983

The initial burden of proving a right to unemployment compensation rests with the claimant, Wincek v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 64 Pa. … Coogler v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 64 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 456 , 440 A.2d 692 (1982). Dietz admits making no attempt to contact the employer from July 30th to August 20th.

Lopez v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

69 Pa. Commw. 566 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 1982

Ruckstuhl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 57 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 302 , 426 A.2d 719 (1981). … Devine v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 69 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 318 , 429 A.2d 1243 (1981).

Bender v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

67 Pa. Commw. 244 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 1982

Opinion by Judge Blatt, Frederick Bender (petitioner) appeals a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) adopting a referee’s denial of benefits under Section 402(e) of the Pennsylvania Unemployment … Peda v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 64 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 184 , 439 A.2d 888 (1982); see Felici v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 66 Pa.

Shyer v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

66 Pa. Commw. 627 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 1982

Shyer, seeks reversal of an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which denied him benefits, finding that he was discharged for willful misconduct 1 because he was involved in an accident in which … its request for remand, Bala v.