Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspacommwct

10,000+ results

0.64s

  • Mulberry Market, Inc. v. City of Philadelphia, Board of License & Inspection Review

    735 A.2d 761 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 4, 1999

    No. 2 constituted harmless error as it was not a finding necessary to the adjudication of the Board. See, e.g., Allingham v. … Cf, Pavonarius v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Board for the Assessment & Revision of Taxes v. Philadelphia Electric Co.

    10 Pa. Commw. 382 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 9, 1973

    Duquesne Light Co. v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, 10 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 41 n. 3 , 299 A. 2d 660 n. 3 (1973). In Longvue Disposal Corporation v. … United Laundries, Inc. v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review, 359 Pa. 195 , 58 A. 2d 833 (1948).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Board of Revision of Taxes v. United Fund of the Philadelphia Area

    11 Pa. Commw. 201 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 1973

    of Revision of Taxes of Philadelphia (Board). … In Robert Morris College v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review, 5 Pa.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • In Re: Appeal of A. Azoulay v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment

    Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 2018

    IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Appeal of Amit Azoulay, : Idit Azoulay and Assaf Lavon, : Appellants : : v … : No. 1085 C.D. 2017 : Philadelphia Zoning Board of : Adjustment and City of Philadelphia : and Hillcrest Preservation Alliance, : LLC, and Friends of The Wissahickon

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wayne County Board of Assessment v. Rolling Hills Girl Scout Council

    19 Pa. Commw. 484 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 1975

    See Grandview Cemetery Association v. Allegheny County Board of Property Assessment, 209 Pa. Superior Ct. 109 , 224 A. 2d 780 (1966). … See Boy Scouts of America v. Board of Assessment, 31 Pa. D. & C. 2d 285 (1963); Camden County Council, Boy Scouts of America v. Bucks County, 13 Pa. D. & C. 213 (1929).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Claim of Milbourne v. Commonwealth

    82 Pa. Commw. 259 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 1984

    See Brown v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 67 Pa. … See Palmer v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 68 Pa.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Krantz v. Commonwealth

    86 Pa. Commw. 38 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 1984

    We have previously held that the Board’s imposition of backtime is not a sentence on the parole violation nor analogous to a sentence. 4 Brown v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 72 Pa. … See Cox v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 78 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 183, 185 , 467 A.2d 90, 91 (1983); Debnam v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 71 Pa.

    Cited 107 timesPublished
  • County Amusement Co. v. County of Cambria Board of Assessment Appeals

    692 A.2d 300 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 7, 1997

    Banzhoff v. Dauphin County Board of Assessment Appeals, 146 Pa.Cmnwlth. 687, 606 A.2d 974 (1992). … Fosko v. Board of Assessment Appeals, 166 Pa.Cmnwlth. 393, 646 A.2d 1275 (1994).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hanover Healthcare Plus, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Penn Township

    875 A.2d 1255 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 13, 2005

    Appellee argues that Muhlenberg College v. Zoning Hearing Board of the City of Allentown, 760 A.2d 443 (Pa.Cmwlth.2000), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 565 Pa. 679 , 775 A.2d 811 (2001), controls. … Wolter v. Board of Supervisors of Tredyffrin Township, 828 A.2d 1160 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 577 Pa. 683 , 843 A.2d 1240 (2004).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Slovak-American Citizens Club of Oakview v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

    120 Pa. Commw. 528 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 1988

    Bresch v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 42 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 192 , 401 A.2d 381 (1979). … Replogle v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 514 Pa. 209, 523 A.2d 327 (1987).

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Smith-Dowridge v. Zoning Hearing Board of the City of Coatesville

    950 A.2d 398 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 14, 2008

    950 A.2d 398 (2008) SMITH-DOWRIDGE v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF THE CITY OF COATESVILLE. No. 1541CD07. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. May 14, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lutheran Social Services v. Adams County Board for Assessment & Revision of Taxes

    26 Pa. Commw. 580 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 1976

    of Taxes (Board) appeals here from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Adams County which sustained an appeal of the said Lutheran Social Services from the Board’s denial of an exemption. … University of Pittsburgh Tax Exemption Case, 407 Pa. 416 , 180 A.2d 760 (1962); Overmont Corporation v. Board of Revision of Taxes, 25 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 173 , 360 A.2d 302 (1976).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Burger v. Zoning Hearing Board of the Municipality of Penn Hills

    86 Pa. Commw. 601 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 1984

    Lennox v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of City of Pittsburgh, 67 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 417 , 447 A.2d 1049 (1982); Marshall Chevrolet Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of City of Reading, 57 Pa. … Consistent with our holding in Walker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 27 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 522 , 367 A.2d 366 (1976), this evidence is admissible.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Varner v. THE ZONING HEARING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF INDIANA

    960 A.2d 967 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 2008

    960 A.2d 967 (2008) VARNER v. THE ZONING HEARING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF INDIANA. No. 2179CD07. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. October 20, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Zysk v. Commonwealth

    12 Pa. Commw. 409 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 1974

    On appeal, the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirmed and Mr. Zysk has appealed. We affirm the Board. The claimant contends that the record does not support the compensation authorities’ conclusion that Mr. … The applicable law relating to transportation as a ground for declining a referral is set forth by Judge Weight in Brown Unemployment Compensation Case, 194 Pa.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Penn Florida Realty, Lp v. Lower Gwynedd Township Board of Supervisors

    949 A.2d 982 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 2008

    949 A.2d 982 (2008) PENN FLORIDA REALTY, L.P. v. LOWER GWYNEDD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS [4] . No. 203 CD 07, 204 CD 07. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. April 10, 2008. Decision without published opinion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Hickory Farms of Ohio & Liberty Mutual Insurance

    28 Pa. Commw. 30 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 1976

    Ryb itski v. Lebowitz, 175 Pa. … Krchmar v. Oakland Beach Co., 155 Pa. Superior Ct. 430, 434 , 38 A.2d 710, 712 (1944).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Rawling v. Commonwealth

    51 Pa. Commw. 385 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1980

    See Dunlap v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 17 Pa. Cmwlth. 19, 330 A.2d 555 (1975). . . . … Montgomery Mills Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, .26 Pa.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Zamias v. Warren County Board of Assessment and Revision of Taxes

    949 A.2d 981 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 2008

    949 A.2d 981 (2008) ZAMIAS v. WARREN COUNTY BOARD OF ASSESSMENT AND REVISION OF TAXES. No. 925CD06. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. April 1, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board of the Commonwealth v. Calder Manufacturing Co.

    21 Pa. Commw. 528 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 1975

    Although we have recognized exceptions to this general principle in Riley Stoker Corporation v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 9 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 533 , 308 A.2d 205 (1973), and in United Metal Fabricators v. … We conclude with appropriate language of Judge Blatt in Royal Pioneer Ind., Inc. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 11 Pa.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.