Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,447 results
0.56s
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 2015
amount owed) would not qualify for the offset program. … and official immunity and remain immune from suit except as the General Assembly shall specifically waive the immunity.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished77 Pa. Commw. 547 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 14, 1983
In an appeal of that decision, the Board declared Claimant ineligible under both sections stating that she failed to qualify for benefits under Section 401(d)(1) but also under Section 402(b)-(1) because she had not demonstrated … The standard to which Claimant was held by the Board in determining her eligibility under Section 402(b)(1) was clearly incorrect in light of Genetin . The record in the case at bar shows that Ms.
Cited 15 timesPublishedTravaglia v. Department of Corrections
699 A.2d 1317 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 29, 1997
In a reply brief, Travaglia asserts that the context of several telephone calls at the time of the requests established that they were made by Attorney Lesko’s law firm on behalf of Travaglia as their client. … Section 971 l(i) of the Sentencing Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9711(i), provides that no person shall witness an execution except for (1) the superintendent of the institution involved, (2) a qualified physician, (3) six reputable
Cited 9 timesPublished143 Pa. Commw. 116 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 1991
In order to qualify for a variance based on the vested rights doctrine, appellants must show they relied to their detriment on the Borough’s allowing their renovations, as well as establish the following elements of the five-prong … The economic hardship resulting from appellants not being permitted to implement their expansion, if any exists, is clearly self-inflicted.
Cited 1 timesPublished54 Pa. Commw. 578 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 1980
The regular Pennsylvania unemployment compensation program provided for up to 39 full weeks of benefits for qualified applicants. … Our holding in Lents clearly bars this type of collateral attack.
Cited 6 timesPublished60 Pa. Commw. 290 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1981
Clearly, such is not the case. Many governmental officials, who clearly have officer status — such as mayors or state cabinet members or judges — also have the status of employee with respect to compensation. … Neville Township to be determinative unless all of the criteria established by that case are met.
Cited 2 timesPublished954 A.2d 706 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 2008
Florida, 517 U.S. 44 , 116 S.Ct. 1114 , 134 L.Ed.2d 252 (1996) (holding that states are immune from private suits in federal court and that Congress lacks the authority to abrogate that immunity); Printz v. … It is not the FLSA but, rather, the Executive Board that established the biweekly pay schedule for State employees.
Cited 3 timesPublished48 Pa. Commw. 241 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 2, 1980
He applied to the Department for a highway occupancy permit for two access points to serve his commercial establishment, one such access point being located on Price Street and the other on High Street. … C.S. §504. 1 The Department’s Motion for Summary Judgment alleges that Petitioners lack standing’, that the provisions of the Act do not apply to the issuance of a highway occupancy permit and that sovereign immunity is a
Cited 3 timesPublished90 Pa. Commw. 388 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 1985
Clearly the University is neither a State-owned educational institution nor a community college, 'and neither party so contends. … No. 3, P.L. 87, as amended, 24 *393 P.S. §2510-202, established the University .as a “state-related institution in the Commonwealth system of higher education.”
Cited 1 timesPublishedRobert Morris College v. Board of Property Assessment
5 Pa. Commw. 648 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 9, 1972
On March 20, 1962, it qualified as a Pennsylvania non-profit corporation operating under the name of “The Robert Morris School.” … The record clearly shows that a statute of this Commonwealth requires the half-million dollar figure.
Cited 18 timesPublishedClarke v. House of Representatives of the Commonwealth
957 A.2d 361 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 2008
As we stated in Schneck , “it is a well-established principle of law that where a state statute preempts local governments from imposing regulations on a subject, any ordinances to the contrary are unenforceable.” 383 A.2d … The majority concluded that Section 6120 “clearly preempts local governments from regulating the lawful ownership, possession and transportation of firearms[.]” Id. at 229-30 .
Cited 9 timesPublishedArmour Pharmacy v. Bureau of WC Fee Review Hearing Office (Wegman's Food Markets, Inc.)
206 A.3d 660 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 2019
We disagreed and reasoned, inter alia, that the Bureau had to promulgate a regulation before WCJs could qualify vocational experts. … With these principles in mind, we turn to the fee review requirements established in the Act.
Cited 23 timesPublishedCurl v. Solanco School District
936 A.2d 183 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 15, 2007
In addition to *186 recognizing the deference Courts give to an agency’s broad discretionary power to establish rules and regulations, this Court also noted that 1 Pa.Code § 1.4 provides agencies with the power to issue guidelines … CSPG 40 clearly does delineate the two types of supervisory certificates.
Cited 13 timesPublishedBrown v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
913 A.2d 301 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 2006
The Hearing Examiner denied the request because the report was clear and Lieutenant Blakey was not needed to establish guilt or innocence. … Brown is a well-qualified abusive litigator within the meaning of the PLRA. Also, Brown was not prevented from filing his lawsuit. The Respondents moved to dismiss.
Cited 33 timesPublishedGrant Builders v. Commonwealth
33 Pa. Commw. 591 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 16, 1978
Clearly, a claimant must sustain the burden of proving the existence of an employment relationship *594 if he is to qualify for compensation. Barr v. B &B Camper Sales, 7 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 323, 300 A.2d 304 (1973). … The referee’s findings also establish that: (1) the parties had no written contract, (2) Burge was. paid at a set rate established by Grant based on the number of “squares” which he repaired on a roof, (3) Grant purchased
Cited 4 timesPublishedMerchant v. State Bd. of Medicine
162 Pa. Commw. 332 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 2, 1994
In ruling on preliminary objections, we accept as true all well and clearly pleaded facts as well as all inferences which are reasonably deducible therefrom. State Troopers Association v. … In a May 25, 1993 order, the Board voted to temporarily suspend Merchant’s license, finding that the prosecuting attorney had alleged facts in her petition that, if true, establish that the continued practice of medicine
Cited 7 timesPublishedMars Emergency Medical Services, Inc. v. Township of Adams
704 A.2d 1143 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1998
Thus, far from prohibiting local involvement, the legislature clearly encourages such involvement if it does not conflict with the provisions of Act 45. … Mars EMS claims that the Municipalities’ designations conflict with the coordinated, unified system of emergency medical services established by Act 45.
Cited 1 timesPublishedWayne County Board of Assessment v. Rolling Hills Girl Scout Council
19 Pa. Commw. 484 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 1975
Each assessment must be appealed in accordance with the procedure established by the statute. Grandvieio Cemetery Association, supra. … However, the record before us establishes convincing evidence that carries Rolling Hill’s burden of proof and additionally establishes facts easily distinguishable from those in Mount Vernon Hebrew Camps, supra.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDraving v. Lower Southampton Township Zoning Hearing Board
40 Pa. Commw. 243 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 1, 1979
The Board denied the Dravings’ application on the grounds that their ceramic operation did not qualify as a permitted accessory use under the zoning ordinance, and that appellants did not show such hardship as would justify … Moreover, appellee submitted no evidence to establish that his intended use was one customarily conducted in dwellings. 393 Pa. at 404 , 143 A.2d at 60 .
Cited 16 timesPublishedR.E. Johnson v. G.M. Little, Secretary PA DOC
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 2023
and official immunity and remain immune from suit except as the General Assembly shall specifically waive the immunity. … Sovereign immunity may be waived, however.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna