Case law

Zafran v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Empire Kosher Poultry, Inc.)

713 A.2d 698 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 18, 1998

Kujawa v. Latrobe Brewing Co., 454 Pa. 165 , 312 A.2d 411 (1973); Auto Serv. Councils of Pa., Inc. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Bd. (Compton), 139 Pa.Cmwlth. 466 , 590 A.2d 1355 (1991). … Councils; see also Lopresti v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Bd.

Peach Bottom Township v. Peach Bottom Township Zoning Hearing Board

106 Pa. Commw. 340 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 1987

argues that this courts recent decision in Codorus Township v. … Valley View Civic Association v.

C. Avery v. City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 4, 2019

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Coretta Avery : : v. … : No. 311 C.D. 2018 : City of Philadelphia Board of : Pensions and Retirement, : Appellant :

M. Ghaderi, D.O. v. State Board of Osteopathic Medicine

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 2023

Commonwealth v. … See McGrath v. Bureau of Pro. & Occupational Affs., State Bd. of Nursing, 173 A.3d 656, 665 (Pa. 2017) (citing Brown v. State Bd. of Pharmacy, 566 A.2d 913, 915 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1989)); Bhattacharjee v.

General Dynamics, Land Systems Division v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

145 Pa. Commw. 304 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 30, 1992

Sheibley v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (ARA Food Services Co.), 86 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 28, 483 A.2d 593 (1984). … McGraw-Edison v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Ardeno), 120 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 19, 547 A.2d 1290 (1988), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 525 Pa. 607 , 575 A.2d 571 (1990); accord Visintin v.

K. Hovnanian Pennsylvania Acquisitions, LLC v. Newtown Township Board of Supervisors

954 A.2d 718 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 25, 2008

See also Newtown Township Board of Supervisors v. … Mitchell v. Zoning Hearing Board of Mount Penn, 838 A.2d 819 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003).

Person v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

134 Pa. Commw. 232 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 26, 1990

Ruth Person, pro se, appeals an Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) order upholding a referee’s decision to deny Trade Readjustment Allowance 1 (TRA) benefits. We vacate and remand. … Thus, because a determination of whether Person was on employer authorized leave, see Santo v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 130 Pa.

Tastykake, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

73 Pa. Commw. 274 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 6, 1983

Commonwealth Ct. at 44-45 , 415 A.2d at 150 ; Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 48 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 161 , 409 A.2d 486 (1979). J. I. Hass v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 63 Pa. … Thomas v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 55 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 449, 456 , 423 A.2d 784, 788 (1980).

Vogel v. Hopewell Township Zoning Hearing Board

70 Pa. Commw. 586 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1982

In Gilbert v. Montgomery Township Zoning Hearing Board, 58 Pa. … See Vogel v. Hopewell Township Board of Supervisors, 27 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 118 , 365 A.2d 706 (1976).

LTS Development, Inc. v. Middle Smithfield Township Board of Supervisors

862 A.2d 686 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 2004

Vican, President Judge of the Court of the Common Pleas of Monroe County, filed in LTS Development, Inc. v. Middle Smithfield Township Board of Supervisors, — Pa. … Valley View Civic Ass’n v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 501 Pa. 550 , 462 A.2d 637 (1983).

Union Run Corp. v. Lower Paxton Township Board of Supervisors

53 Pa. Commw. 89 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1980

After the township’s board of supervisors rejected the curative amendments, the owner’s appeal to the Common Pleas Court of Dauphin County, with Chemical Realty Corporation intervening as mortgagee, was dismissed, from which … We have found no legal authority for the proposition that financial considerations or prognostications about the disposition of the Board justify ignoring the requirements of the Planning Code.

Shoener v. Schuylkill County Board of Commissioners

69 Pa. Commw. 501 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 1, 1982

In Pumo v. … The appellants complain that no recommendations were submitted to the Board of Commissioners.

Babcock & Wilcox v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

144 Pa. Commw. 355 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 2, 1992

King v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Wendell H. Stone Co.), 132 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 292, 572 A.2d 845 (1990). . … Novak v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 59 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 596, 430 A.2d 703 (1981).

Gibbs v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

134 Pa. Commw. 624 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 10, 1990

Although the board does have the burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the parolee violated the conditions of his parole, Sigafoos v. … Maxfield v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 114 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 162, 538 A.2d 628 (1988).

Talasnik v. Board of Revision of Taxes

129 Pa. Commw. 115 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 1989

The Board of Revision of Taxes of the City and School District of Philadelphia (Appellant) has appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. … In Pugar v.

Sunset Development, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors

143 Pa. Commw. 640 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 27, 1991

See Noll v. … The position advanced by the Board must prevail. In Providence Builders, Inc. v.

Plumstead Township Board of Supervisors v. Heritage Building Group, Inc.

950 A.2d 397 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 6, 2008

950 A.2d 397 (2008) PLUMSTEAD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS v. HERITAGE BUILDING GROUP, INC. No. 1387CD07. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. May 6, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

Lawrie v. Public School Employees' Retirement Board

141 Pa. Commw. 363 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 22, 1991

The same underlying facts are also the subject of litigation which is before us in our appellate jurisdiction at Lawrie v. Public School Employees’ Retirement Board of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 141 Pa. … We, therefore, must conclude that Petitioner has not stated a cause of action and, hence, the Board’s demurrer must be sustained. See Smolow v.

Boro of Folcroft v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

167 Pa. Commw. 290 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 2, 1994

In Borough of Media v. … Blannett’s testimony serves as substantial evidence to support the referee’s findings, Lewis v.

Reading Housing Authority v. Board of Assessment Appeals of Berks County

103 A.3d 869 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 2014

The Board’s appeal to this Court followed. 5 A property owned by a municipal authority, which is primarily and principally used for a public purpose, is not taxable. Norwegian Twp. v. … Board of Assessment Appeals, 591 Pa. 436 , 919 A.2d 206 (2007), which involved the purely public charity provision found in Article 8, Section 2(a)(v) of the Pennsylvania Constitution.