Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspacommwct

10,000+ results

1.18s

  • PSSU, Local 668 of Seiu v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

    740 A.2d 270 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 1999

    Fraternal Order of Police v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board 695 A.2d 926 (Pa.Cmwlth.1997), aff' d, 557 Pa. 586 , 735 A.2d 96 (1999), School District of the Township of Millcreek v. … Paulinski v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Cain v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    145 Pa. Commw. 448 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 10, 1992

    Coulter v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 16 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 462, 466, 332 A.2d 876, 879 (1975). … Kirkwood v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 106 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 92, 525 A.2d 841 (1987). .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Upper Salford Township Board of Supervisors v. Th Properties, Lp

    964 A.2d 986 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 11, 2009

    964 A.2d 986 (2009) UPPER SALFORD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS v. T.H. PROPERTIES, L.P. No. 69CD08. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. February 11, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Supervisors v. Laurelwood Construction Co.

    144 Pa. Commw. 63 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 5, 1991

    The zoning hearing board sustained the township’s objections and dismissed the proceeding. … Former section 1004 indicates that the zoning hearing board validity attack must involve a zoning hearing board report under MPC § 910 or § 913.1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Matlack, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    158 Pa. Commw. 94 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 23, 1993

    Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board is affirmed. … Our first decision is reported at DeMarco v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 101 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 54, 515 A.2d 629 (1986) (DeMarco I); the second at DeMarco v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Radnor Township School District v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    135 Pa. Commw. 406 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1990

    Our Supreme Court in Taylor v. … Shaw v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 46 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 452, 406 A.2d 608 (1979).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    793 A.2d 1012 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 2002

    American Refrigerator Equipment Company v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 31 Pa.Cmwlth. 590 , 377 A.2d 1007 (1977). … Socha v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Bell Atlantic-Pa., Inc.), 566 Pa. 602 , 783 A.2d 288 (2001).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dalton Police Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

    765 A.2d 1171 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 11, 2001

    West Hanover Township v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 166 Pa.Cmwlth. 260 , 646 A.2d 625 (1994). … State System of Higher Education v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 737 A.2d 313 (Pa.Cmwlth.1999). . See West Peny School District v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 752 A.2d 461 (Pa.Cmwlth.2000). .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Glammer v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    136 Pa. Commw. 398 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 1990

    Glammer (claimant) appeals here from a decision and order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirming the referee’s denial of benefits under Section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation *400 Law … In Hussar v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 61 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 28 , 432 A.2d 643 (1981), we stated the manner in which a request for sequestration of a witness should be reviewed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dream Mile Club, Inc. v. Tobyhanna Township Board of Supervisors

    150 Pa. Commw. 309 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 2, 1992

    Valley View Civic Association v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 501 Pa. 550 , 462 A.2d 637 (1983). 1. … Timberline cites McClimans v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Cales v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (New Warwick Mining Co.)

    721 A.2d 1138 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1998

    Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Hyatt), 531 Pa. 186 , 611 A.2d 1187 (1992), and LTV Steel Co. v. … See also City of Philadelphia, Risk Management Div. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Harvey), 690 A.2d 1293 (Pa.Cmwlth.1997).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Yocum v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF WYOMISSING

    961 A.2d 275 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 10, 2008

    961 A.2d 275 (2008) YOCUM v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF WYOMISSING. No. 2176CD07. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. November 10, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Morysville Body Works, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    29 Pa. Commw. 297 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 1977

    Opinion by Judge Wilkinson, This appeal arises from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) granting 43 employes and former employes (claimants) unemployment compensation benefits because they were … The issue was previously raised in Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Haughton Elevator Co., 21 Pa.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Harclerode v. Everett Area Sch. Dist. Superintendent and School Board

    961 A.2d 275 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 2008

    961 A.2d 275 (2008) HARCLERODE v. EVERETT AREA SCH. DIST. SUPERINTENDENT AND SCHOOL BOARD. No. 853CD08. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. November 13, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Colonial Beef Co. v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    68 Pa. Commw. 627 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 10, 1982

    Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 466 Pa. 81 , 351 A.2d 631 (1976). … “Substantial evidence” is that evidence which a reasonable mind might accept, as adequate to support a finding of the Board. O’Keefe v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 18 Pa.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • American Asphalt Paving Co. v. Zoning Hearing Board

    706 A.2d 1283 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 10, 1998

    Before this Court is an appeal by the JacksOn Township Board of Supervisors (Township) and the Zoning Hearing Board of Jackson Township (ZHB) (collectively, Appellants) of an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne … Penn Piping, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North America, 529 Pa. 350 , 603 A.2d 1006 (1992). The Appellants rely heavily on Penn Piping to support their argument that the trial court erred in not granting their motion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Keystone Coal Mining Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Fink)

    896 A.2d 691 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 2006

    Consolidated Freightways v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Jester), 145 Pa.Cmwlth.369, 603 A.2d 291 (1992). See also Deremer v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 61 Pa. Cmwlth. 415, 433 A.2d 926 (1981). … In Stewart v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Pa.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Township of Upper Darby v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    53 Pa. Commw. 438 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 1980

    Opinion by Judge MacPhail, The Township of Upper Darby and General Accident Group (Petitioners) have filed this appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the referee’s order … American Refrigerator Equipment Company v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 31 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 590 , 377 A.2d 1007 (1977).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • 1204 Corp. v. Joint Zoning Hearing Board

    126 Pa. Commw. 385 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 7, 1989

    Section 915, in turn, requires that an individual aggrieved by a borough council decision granting a conditional use application must first appeal to the zoning hearing board within thirty days. Schultz v. … Mosside Associates v. Zoning Hearing Board of Monroeville, 70 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 555, 454 A.2d 199 (1982). See also Toro Development Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vaughan v. Commonwealth

    52 Pa. Commw. 38 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 1980

    Petitioner contends that his dismissal was invalid because the Department presented no evidence that Brown was petitioner’s appointing authority, defined in Section 3(e) of the Act, 71 P.S. §741.3(e), as “the officers, board … In Moore v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 1 Pa.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.