Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspacommwct

10,000+ results

4.01s

  • City of Butler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Botsis)

    708 A.2d 1306 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1998

    Relying on our decision in Kelly v. … Nasim v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Snap-Tite, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    711 A.2d 1065 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 5, 1998

    In Canonsburg General Hospital v. … Notwithstanding the above, Employer argues that this case is controlled by Acme Corrugated Box Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 131 Pa.Cmwlth. 251 , 570 A.2d 100 (1990), and T.B. Wood’s Sons Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Beaver Gasoline Co. v. Zoning Board of Borough of Osborne

    1 Pa. Commw. 458 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1971

    Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Zoning Bd. of Adj., 425 Pa. 43, 228 .A. 2d 169 ,(1967). . … As we held in Daikeler v. Zoning Bd. of Adj., 1 Comm.

    Vacated by Beaver Gasoline Co. v. Osborne Borough, 445 Pa. 571 (1971)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Centre Lime & Stone Co. v. Spring Township Board of Supervisors

    787 A.2d 1105 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 2001

    Fernley v. Board of Supervisors of Schuylkill Township, 509 Pa. 413 , 502 A.2d 585 (1985). … Valley View Civic Association v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 501 Pa. 550 , 462 A.2d 637 (1983). The Board abuses its discretion if its findings are not supported by substantial evidence. McClimans v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Mrs. Smith's Frozen Food Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    113 Pa. Commw. 25 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 1988

    On Employer’s Modification Petition, hearings were held.at which the testimony of Claimant and that of a Vocational Consultant, Harold V. … We must agree with the Board, particularly in light of the decision of our Supreme Court in Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Vepco Construction Co.), Pa. , A.2d (No. 59 E.D.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board of the Commonwealth v. Greene

    21 Pa. Commw. 375 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 1975

    Scarpelli v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 18 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 30 , 333 A.2d 828 (1975). … General Tire and Rubber Company v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 16 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 473 , 332 A.2d 867 (1975); Chamberlain Corporation v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 9 Pa.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • T.B. Wood's Sons Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    150 Pa. Commw. 217 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 26, 1992

    Hercules, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 146 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 77, 604 A.2d 1159 (1992). . … Hughes v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 51 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 448, 414 A.2d 757 (1980).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    719 A.2d 1125 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 1998

    Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 686 A.2d 893 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996). … Miceli v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 519 Pa. 515 , 549 A.2d 113 (1988).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    28 Pa. Commw. 445 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 3, 1977

    Opinion by Judge Crumlish, Jr., This is an appeal by United States Steel Corpora^tion (Employer) from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which affirmed a referee’s determination that five claimants … In United States Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 9 Pa.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Scozio Enterpises, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    691 A.2d 1042 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 1997

    In Canonsburg General Hosp. v. … Wetzel v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 29 Pa.Cmwlth. 195 , 370 A.2d 415 (1977). The Board quotes the letter of March 24 in full.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • American General Life v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    147 Pa. Commw. 698 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 7, 1992

    American General Life (Employer) petitions this Court to review a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which reversed a referee’s decision and awarded benefits to Rosemarie Kline (Claimant). … Kirkwood v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 106 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 92, 525 A.2d 841 (1987).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • City of Pittsburgh v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & Review

    49 Pa. Commw. 442 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 1980

    In 1971 the property was placed in the taxable category by the board. … That the provision of public parking can be a public purpose has been recognized by the courts of this state since McSorley v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Coastal Tank Lines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    96 Pa. Commw. 254 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 1986

    Holshue v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Robideu Express), 84 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 253 , 479 A.2d 42 (1984). … Although the referee in workmen’s compensation cases, not the board, is the ultimate factfinder, Garcia v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Northside Urban Pathways Charter School v. State Charter School Appeal Board

    56 A.3d 80 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 2012

    See also City of Pittsburgh v. … Foreman v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Board of Directors of Riverside School District v. Carmody

    47 Pa. Commw. 201 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 1979

    In Gabriel v. Trinity Area School District, 22 Pa. … Board of Education of Fairview School District v. Tomb, 40 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 458 , 397 A.2d 1268 (1979).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ganly's Pub & Deli v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    163 Pa. Commw. 102 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 1994

    O’Connor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 50 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 573 , 413 A.2d 458 (1980); Lovrekovic v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 36 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 364, 387 A.2d 685 (1978). … Further, the Board cites 1030 North West End Boulevard, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • St. Joe Minerals Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    76 Pa. Commw. 325 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 1983

    Carey v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (General Electric Co.), 72 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 10 , 455 A.2d 774 (1983) (citing United States Steel Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 52 Pa. … Lehigh Valley Coal Sales Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 66 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 59, 65 , 443 A.2d 1339, 1342 (1982). (Citation omitted.) 77 P.S. §631.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hill v. Commonwealth

    106 Pa. Commw. 38 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 8, 1987

    He states that the Boards action was in violation, of Rivenbark v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 509 Pa. 248 , 501 A.2d 1110 (1985) and Massey v. … Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Workers' Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    845 A.2d 987 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 2004

    However, relying on Hughes v. … In Straight Line Express v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pittsburgh Board of Public Education v. Pittsburgh Federation of Teachers

    105 A.3d 847 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 2014

    State System of Higher Education (Cheyney University) v. State College and University Professional Association (PSEANEA), 560 Pa. 135 , 743 A.2d 405, 413 (1999). … Philadelphia Housing Authority v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, 617 Pa. 69 , 52 A.3d 1117, 1121 (2012).

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.