Case law

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

29 Pa. Commw. 73 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 1976

In this case we can reverse the Board only if we conclude that its findings of fact and conclusions, of law are inconsistent with each other. Walsh v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 16 Pa. … Millersville State College v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Re view, 18 Pa.

Volkswagon of America, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

858 A.2d 151 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 2004

Udvari v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (USAir, Inc.), 550 Pa. 319, 327 , 705 A.2d 1290, 1293 (1997). … Maranc v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Bienenfeld), 751 A.2d 1196 (Pa.Cmwlth.2000).

Dobasewski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

91 Pa. Commw. 611 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 1985

Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co., 431 Pa. 446 , 246 A.2d 668 (1968); Petrone v. Moffat Coal Co., 427 Pa. 5 , 233 A.2d 891 (1967); St. Vincent Health Center v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 59 Pa. … Kachinski v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 91 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 543, 545-6 , 498 A.2d 36, 37 (No. 2160 C.D. 1984, filed September 10, 1985) (emphasis in original). See 4156 Bar Corp. v.

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth v. Walton

21 Pa. Commw. 47 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 7, 1975

MacFarlane v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 12 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 550 , 317 A.2d 324 (1974). … See Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Company v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 10 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 289 , 310 A.2d 449 (1973) ; DiAmico v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 10 Pa.

Garrison v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

88 Pa. Commw. 526 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 9, 1985

Hershey Estates v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 9 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 470 , 308 A.2d 637 (1973); Armco Steel Corporation v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Magnone), 68 Pa. … In Neshaminy Construction Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 43 Pa. Commonwealth.

Narcotics Agents Regional Committee v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

833 A.2d 314 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 2003

Cambria County Deputy Sheriffs Association v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 799 A.2d 957 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2002); Delaware County Lodge No. 27, Fraternal Order of Police v. … See, e.g., Commonwealth v.

Sysco Food Services of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

940 A.2d 1270 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 2008

Inglis House v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Reedy), 535 Pa. 135 , 634 A.2d 592 (1993). … Camino v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (City Mission), 796 A.2d 412 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002).

Malakoff v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

78 Pa. Commw. 178 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 3, 1983

This case does not involve a cumulating of nonconforming uses, as condemned in Hauser v. Borough of Catasauqua Zoning Hearing Board, 20 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 313 , 341 A.2d 566 (1975). … Commonwealth v. Cieslak, 179 Pa. Superior Ct. 441 , 115 A.2d 418 (1955), which involved an antecedent . illegal use, is therefore inapplicable.

O'Hara v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

77 Pa. Commw. 222 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 1983

In Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 77 Pa. … Berkowitz’ testimony is, at best, contradictory on the point of causation, 3 we affirm the order of the board. *225 Order Now, September 19, 1983, we affirm the order of the 'Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, No.

Hughes v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

76 Pa. Commw. 559 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 26, 1983

The test, as laid down in Leipziger v. Workmen’s Compen *562 sation Appeal Board, 12 Pa. … DeGuffroy & Associates, Inc. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 52 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 58 , 415 A.2d 437 (1980). Therefore, we will reverse.

Alan Wood Steel Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

74 Pa. Commw. 230 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 10, 1983

It has long been the law that an order of the board remanding a case to a referee is considered interlocutory and therefore unappealable. Harris v. No. 1 Contracting Corporation of Delaware, 215 Pa. … [A] remand order of the Board is interlocutory and unappealable as a matter of right, without exception.” Murhon v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 51 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 214, 217, 414 A.2d 161, 163 (1980).

Koolvent Aluminum Products, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

134 Pa. Commw. 505 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 22, 1990

Four-Way Construction Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Snyder) 113 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 235, 536 A.2d 873 (1988). … Lukens, Inc. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Williams), 130 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 479, 568 A.2d 981 (1989).

Young-Oue v. the Point Township Zoning Hearing Board

978 A.2d 1087 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 27, 2009

978 A.2d 1087 (2009) YOUNG-OUE v. THE POINT TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD. No. 2076CD08. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. July 27, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

Sloan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

68 Pa. Commw. 537 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 1, 1982

Mancini v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 64 Pa. … See Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co., 431 Pa. 446 , 246 A.2d 668 (1968).

Williamette Industries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

647 A.2d 665 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 29, 1994

Therefore, the Board’s determination that the 1990 rates should apply is affirmed. Next Employer argues that the Board ignored Helen Mining v. … General Electric Co. v.

McLaughlin v. State Employees' Retirement Board

157 Pa. Commw. 334 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 27, 1993

Estate of McGovern v. … In Cutshall v.

Frockowiak v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

156 Pa. Commw. 262 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 1993

This appeal began when Claimant’s pro se letter was delivered to the Board on June 8, 1992, stating that Claimant wished to appeal the Board’s order. The Board delivered the letter to our chief clerk on June 10, 1992. … Employer cites our discussion of Pa.R.A.P. 105(b) in Larocca v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 140 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 192, 592 A.2d 757 (1991).

Percudani House, Lp v. Stroud Township Zoning Hearing Board

2 A.3d 815 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 11, 2010

2 A.3d 815 (2010) PERCUDANI HOUSE, L.P. v. STROUD TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD. No. 2134CD09. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. August 11, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

Marshall v. East Bradford Twp. Board of Supervisors and Soland

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 9, 2021

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA John Marshall & Dara-Gans Marshall, : Appellants : : v. … : No. 102 C.D. 2020 : East Bradford Township Board of : Supervisors and Daniel Soland and : Dorothy Soland

Lantz v. Zoning Hearing Board of South Middleton Township

76 Pa. Commw. 563 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 26, 1983

See Cablevision v. Zoning Hearing Board of Easton, 13 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 232 , 320 A.2d 388 (1974). … See Snyder v. Railroad Borough, 59 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 385 , 430 A.2d 339 (1980).