Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspacommwct

10,000+ results

1.05s

  • Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    14 Pa. Commw. 54 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1974

    Our scope of review in zoning cases in which, as here, the court below did not take additional testimony is limited to a determination of whether the Board abused its discretion or committed an error of law. Bamash v. … Commercial Properties, Inc. v. Peternel, 418 Pa. 304 , 211 A. 2d 514 (1965).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Alan Wood Steel Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    74 Pa. Commw. 230 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 10, 1983

    It has long been the law that an order of the board remanding a case to a referee is considered interlocutory and therefore unappealable. Harris v. No. 1 Contracting Corporation of Delaware, 215 Pa. … [A] remand order of the Board is interlocutory and unappealable as a matter of right, without exception.” Murhon v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 51 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 214, 217, 414 A.2d 161, 163 (1980).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Koolvent Aluminum Products, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    134 Pa. Commw. 505 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 22, 1990

    Four-Way Construction Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Snyder) 113 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 235, 536 A.2d 873 (1988). … Lukens, Inc. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Williams), 130 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 479, 568 A.2d 981 (1989).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Rochester & Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    29 Pa. Commw. 484 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 1977

    Opinion by Judge Rogers, This is an appeal by an employer, the Rochester & Pittsburgh Coal Company, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania from the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board’s order affirming a referee’s award to … and Klebick v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Stana v. Board of Public Education

    158 Pa. Commw. 36 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 19, 1993

    See George v. Department of Education, 15 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 239, 325 A.2d 819 (1974). … Homan v. Blue Ridge School District, 45 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 89, 405 A.2d 572 (1979). .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hempfield Area School District v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

    920 A.2d 222 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 2007

    The trial court relied upon Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. … . *226 In Danville Area School District v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hague v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    139 Pa. Commw. 545 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 7, 1991

    Thus, in Romig v. … Thus, as stated by Judge MacPhail quite recently in the case of Guttman Oil Co v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 57 Pa.Commonwealth. Ct. 486, 489, 426 A.2d 760, 761-762 (1981): In Romig v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • The S.D. of Philadelphia v. Board of Revision of Taxes

    Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 2023

    IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA The School District of Philadelphia, : CASES CONSOLIDATED Appellant : : v. … and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA : : The School District of Philadelphia, : Appellant : : v

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moonlight Mushrooms, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    142 Pa. Commw. 153 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 23, 1991

    In Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. … In Dehus v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Albert Einstein Medical Center v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

    26 Pa. Commw. 440 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 21, 1976

    Commonwealth Ct. 634 , 358 A.2d 134 (1976); Pennsylvania Labor Relation Board v. Columbia Hospital, 21 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 236 , 344 A.2d 740 (1975); and Albert Einstein Medical Center v. … Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 17 Pa.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Nuara v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

    136 Pa. Commw. 402 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 1990

    In support of his position, he cites Rossetti v. Reading Housing Authority, 116 Pa. … He analogizes his situation to that of the PLCB employee discharged in Long v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Esh v. Board of Supervisors of East Lampeter Township

    974 A.2d 1213 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2009

    The Board of Supervisors (Board of Supervisors) of East Lampeter Township (Township) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County (common pleas court) that reversed the Board of Supervisors’ denial … This Court's review is limited to a determination of whether the Board committed an error of law and whether necessary findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence. Piatek v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Frank v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    157 Pa. Commw. 447 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 3, 1993

    In Eugenie v. … Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Sebro), 132 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 288, 572 A.2d 843 (1990).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cook v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

    15 A.3d 562 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 1, 2011

    15 A.3d 562 (2011) COOK v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. No. 857CD10. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. March 1, 2011. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Frockowiak v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    156 Pa. Commw. 262 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 1993

    This appeal began when Claimant’s pro se letter was delivered to the Board on June 8, 1992, stating that Claimant wished to appeal the Board’s order. The Board delivered the letter to our chief clerk on June 10, 1992. … Employer cites our discussion of Pa.R.A.P. 105(b) in Larocca v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 140 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 192, 592 A.2d 757 (1991).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Northern Health Facilities v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    663 A.2d 276 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 31, 1995

    Estate of Fells v. … were admissible); Dorsey v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Faith Presbyterian Church v. Bensalem Township Zoning Hearing Board

    114 Pa. Commw. 107 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 26, 1988

    This Court, in the case of Rayel v. Bridgeton Township Zoning Hearing Board, 98 Pa. … Tantlinger v. Zoning Hearing Board of South Union Township, 103 Pa.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Oscar Mayer Foods Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    167 Pa. Commw. 370 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 13, 1994

    In support of its interpretation, the Board relies upon Young v. … The Board also relied upon Brown v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    29 Pa. Commw. 73 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 1976

    In this case we can reverse the Board only if we conclude that its findings of fact and conclusions, of law are inconsistent with each other. Walsh v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 16 Pa. … Millersville State College v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Re view, 18 Pa.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • North Chestnut Hill Neighbors v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    977 A.2d 1196 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 2009

    North Chestnut Hill Neighbors v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 928 A.2d 418 (Pa.Cmwlth.2007). Quoting our supreme court’s decision in East Tor-resdale Civic Association v. … Domeisen v. Zoning Hearing Board, 814 A.2d 851 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003).

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.