Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspacommwct

10,000+ results

1.39s

  • Esab Welding & Cutting Products v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    978 A.2d 399 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 2009

    Employer also argues that a November 1, 2007 decision of the Board (Lehman v. ESAB Group, Appeal Docket No. … Since this Court is not bound by decisions of the Board, and may only address issues before it, Lehman cannot be considered by this Court. 7 . Pennsylvania State Univ. v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Korch v. State Board of Physical Therapy

    900 A.2d 941 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 2006

    However, I would further distinguish Kepler v. State Board of Physical Therapy, 720 A.2d 496 (Pa.Cmwlth.1998). As the majority correctly notes, Kepler is distinguishable because Susan E.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Louk v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    72 Pa. Commw. 1 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 9, 1983

    Fritzo v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 59 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 268 , 429 A.2d 1215 (1981). … Food Fair Stores v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 11 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 535 , 314 A.2d 528 (1974).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hallstead Foundry, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    115 Pa. Commw. 379 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 16, 1986

    This Court said in Young v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Britt & Pirie, Inc.), 72 Pa. … Anderson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 51 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 582, 585 , 414 A.2d 774, 776 (1980); Douglas v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 32 Pa.

    Reversed on other grounds by Cudo v. Hallstead Foundry, Inc., 517 Pa. 553 (1988)Cited 1 timesPublished
  • T. Stewart v. City of Philadelphia (WCAB)

    Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 2025

    We therefore affirm the Board’s determination on this issue. Brown v. City of Phila. (Workers’ Comp. Appeal Bd.), 330 A.3d 12, 18-19 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2025). … In Mosgo v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Tri-Area Beverage, Inc.), 480 A.2d 1285 (Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • General Carbide Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    671 A.2d 268 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 5, 1996

    Cunningham v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Franklin Steel Company), 159 Pa.Cmwlth. 622 , 634 A.2d 267 (1993). . Claimant argues that this matter is analogous to Pieretti v. … See Bama v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • M & D Auto Body v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    143 Pa. Commw. 346 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 1991

    We first shall address the appealability of the board’s remand. The board’s remand order was interlocutory and unappealable when it was entered. FMC v. … A & P Tea Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Giglio), 114 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 507, 539 A.2d 51 (1988); Rettinger v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Old Forge Bank v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    666 A.2d 761 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 1995

    Employer argues, on appeal, relying upon Frankford Hospital v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 66 Pa. Cmwlth. 452, 445 A.2d 256 (1982), and Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. … See Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v.

    Criticized by Allegheny Valley School v. Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 548 Pa. 355 (1997)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • R. M. Kerner Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    18 Pa. Commw. 282 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 1975

    Of course, the propriety of the Board’s substitution of its own findings for the finding of the referee is governed by our frequently cited decision in Universal Cyclops Steel Corporation v. Krawczynski, 9 Pa. … See Hinkle v. H. J. Heinz Co., 7 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 216 , 298 A. 2d 632 (1972).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State Workers' Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    837 A.2d 697 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 2003

    See Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Insurance Company of North America), 101 Pa.Cmwlth.552, 516 A.2d 1318 (1986). … The ease of Gallagher Bassett Services v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Millcreek Township School District v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

    158 Pa. Commw. 156 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 24, 1993

    Penn *163 sylvania Labor Relations Board v. General Braddock Area School District, 33 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 55, 380 A.2d 946 (1977); Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board. … See, e.g., Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Society Hill Civic Ass'n v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment

    42 A.3d 1178 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 9, 2012

    See, e.g., Evans v. … Our conclusion is also bolstered by our decision in East Allegheny Community Council v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of City of Pittsburgh, 128 Pa.Cmwlth. 391 , 563 A.2d 945 (1989).

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Cherry Valley Associates v. Stroud Township Board of Supervisors

    123 Pa. Commw. 260 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 1, 1989

    Lamb v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Ambridge, 111 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 534 , 534 A.2d 577 (1987). … Raum v. Board of Supervisors of Tredyffrin Township, 29 Pa.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth ex rel. Gallas v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

    161 Pa. Commw. 97 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1993

    In Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. … Bradley v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Blaney v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    58 Pa. Commw. 260 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 1981

    MacFarlane *266 v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 12 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 550, 554 , 317 A.2d 324, 326 (1974). … Order And Now, this 3rd day of April, 1981, the order of the Board of Review is reversed and the record is remanded for computation of benefits.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jehrio v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    890 A.2d 1169 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 20, 2006

    Centennial School District v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Education, 94 Pa.Cmwlth. 530 , 503 A.2d 1090 (1986), aff’d, 517 Pa. 540 , 539 A.2d 785 (1988). … Renda v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 837 A.2d 685 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Municipal Authority of the Borough of Edgeworth v. Borough of Ambridge Water Authority

    936 A.2d 538 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 1, 2007

    However, Ambridge was ex *541 tremely interested in providing bulk water to Edgeworth, 1 and Ambridge’s Board of Directors (Ambridge Board) authorized Brown to offer bulk water to Edgeworth at a reduced price. … After further negotiations, the Edge-worth and Ambridge Boards resolved to enter into an agreement, and, on September 4, 1998, the Ambridge Board authorized Brown to submit a “Letter of Intent” to Edgeworth, agreeing, in

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Mountain Protection Alliance v. Fayette County Zoning Hearing Board

    757 A.2d 1007 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 2000

    and granted the mandamus. 1 On appeal, this court affirmed, Amerikohl Mining Co. v. … Shattuck v. Zoning Hearing Board of Warren County, 93 Pa.Cmwlth. 209 , 501 A.2d 319 (1985).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • ITT-Hartford Insurance Group v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    688 A.2d 247 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 24, 1997

    (Employer) and ITT-Hartford Insurance Group (Hartford) (collectively referred to as “Petitioners”) appeal an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the order of the Workers’ Compensation Judge … Accordingly, the Board’s order is affirmed. ORDER AND NOW, this 2hth day of January, 1997, the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board in the above-captioned matter is hereby affirmed. .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • St. Joe Zinc v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    92 Pa. Commw. 259 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 1985

    American Refrigerator Equipment Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 31 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 590 , 377 A.2d 1007 (1977). … Order And Now, this 16th day of October, 1985, the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board in the above-captioned matter is affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.