Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspacommwct

10,000+ results

1.84s

  • Albert v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Crime Victim's Compensation Board

    81 Pa. Commw. 76 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1984

    Opinion by Judge Williams, Jr., Morris Albert (claimant) appeals from an order of the Pennsylvania Crime Victim’s Compensation Board (board) which denied his claim for compensation because it was not timely filed under Section … Both claimant and the board now assert that the finding of a June 16, 1980 claim filing date is erroneous. Section 191.2(f) of the regulations, 37 Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harvey v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Monongahela Valley Hospital)

    983 A.2d 1254 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 2009

    In Edwards v. … Vinglinsky v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Penn Installation), 139 Pa.Cmwlth.15, 589 A.2d 291, 293 (1991). .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Fleming v. Zoning Hearing Board of Haverford Township

    76 Pa. Commw. 197 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 5, 1983

    Opinion by Judge Williams, Jr., On August 6, 1982, the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County reversed a decision by the Zoning Hearing Board of Haverford Township (Zoning Board) that had granted a use variance to John … Several protesting neighbors, who had appeared at the hearing before the Zoning Board, took a timely appeal to the Court of Common Pleas from the decision of the Board. John R. Williams and C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • A & P Tea Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    114 Pa. Commw. 507 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 1988

    While it is true that we have held that inartfully drawn factual findings do not necessarily compel a remand, see Hammermill Paper Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 30 Pa. … Similarly, Kunicki v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 56 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 72 , 423 A.2d 1368 (1981), cited by Employer, is not helpful.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    69 Pa. Commw. 408 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 1982

    The specific offense charged by the employer and found by the Board to have substantial evidentiary support was that the claimant falsified certain records essential to the computation of his wages. … Order reversed; record remanded. *416 Order The order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Decision No.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lease v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    69 Pa. Commw. 246 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1982

    The findings of the Board reveal that she had been specifically informed by her employer at the end of her shift on August 22 that she was expected to work the next day and that she made no reply. … The Board also found that the claimant had called in sick *249 on a prior occasion when she wished to attend a wedding.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stine v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    68 Pa. Commw. 110 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 2, 1982

    We therefore remand the case to the Board for further action. Order And Now, this 2nd day of August, 1982, the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, No. … B-182488, dated March 27, 1980, is hereby remanded to the Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Opinion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Weinstock v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    62 Pa. Commw. 3 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 18, 1981

    Per Curiam, The claimant in this unemployment compensation case contends that the finding of the Board of Review that she had not given her employer prior notices of proposed absences from work during the period of five days … Per Curiam Order And Now, this 18th day of September, 1981, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review dated August 25,1980 is affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • D. Angelucci v. PA Labor Relations Board

    210 A.3d 367 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 2, 2019

    IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Daniel Angelucci, : Petitioner : : v. … Grube filed a similar petition for review in this Court, which we adjudicate at Grube v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Simon Konover & Assoc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    89 Pa. Commw. 396 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 22, 1985

    reverse the board on a vested rights basis ? … Additionally, however, .the trial court found that the applicant had acquired a vested right in the permit, in accordance with Petrosky v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • PECO Energy Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    682 A.2d 36 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 16, 1996

    Salerno v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 674 A.2d 776 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996). … See Westinghouse v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 549 A.2d 623 (Pa.Cmwlth.1988); Tenaglia v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 73 Pa. Cmwlth. 453, 458 A.2d 331 (1983).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • McGowan v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    60 Pa. Commw. 250 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1981

    Miller v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 45 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 539 , 405 A.2d 1034 (1979). … Keefer v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 47 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 281 , 407 A.2d 934 (1979).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • West Central Germantown Neighbors v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    827 A.2d 1283 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 2003

    Silver v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 485 Pa. 99 , 255 A.2d 506 (1969). … See O’Neill v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Springdale Township v. Allegheny County Board of Property Assessment

    78 Pa. Commw. 100 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 1983

    The township had first appealed to the Allegheny County Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review, arguing that a segment of West Penn’s property was not entitled to exemption from local taxation; the board denied … Duquesne Light Co. v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review of Allegheny County, 10 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 41, 299 A.2d 660 (1973), rev’d sub nom. American Telephone and Telegraph Co. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • J. A. Bell, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board

    91 Pa. Commw. 643 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 1985

    Bell, Inc., appeals from an order of the Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas, which affirmed the decision of the Hickory Township Zoning Board of Adjustment (Board) denying Appellant’s request for a special exception. … Appellant’s application was denied by the Township’s Planning Commission and Appellant appealed to the Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fayette Resources, Inc. v. Fayette County Board of Assessment Appeals

    107 A.3d 839 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 2014

    Mesivtah Eitz Chaim of Bobov, Inc. v. Pike County Board of Assessment Appeals, 615 Pa. 463 , 44 A.3d 3, 9 (2012); Community Options, Inc. v. … Macrina Manor, Inc. v. Fayette County Board of Assessment Appeals, 683 A.2d 935, 939-40 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Tom Tobin Wholesale v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    144 Pa. Commw. 44 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 1991

    Tobin cites Department of Corrections v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 119 Pa. … Zinman v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Duquesne Light Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    77 Pa. Commw. 426 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1983

    The award was affirmed by the Board, but later vacated with a remand, in response to an uncontested petition by Duquesne for a rehearing. … Order Now, October 7, 1983, the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board dated December 31, 1981 at number A-80712, is affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Blose v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    68 Pa. Commw. 319 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 13, 1982

    Blose (claimant) from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) denying benefits to the claimant on the ground that he was discharged for willful misconduct and was therefore ineligible for unemployment … Kresge v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 46 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 78 , 405 A.2d 1123 (1979).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Glen Mills Schools v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    665 A.2d 561 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1995

    Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 474 Pa. 351 , 378 A.2d 829 (1977). … Steck v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 78 Pa.Cmwlth. 514 , 467 A.2d 1378 (1983).

    Cited 11 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.