Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspacommwct

10,000+ results

0.42s

  • Toth v. City of Allentown Zoning Hearing Board

    92 Pa. Commw. 593 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 1985

    The board further found that the lot was not suitable for residential purposes. … Wynnewood Civic Association v. Lower Merion Township Board of Adjustment, 406 Pa. 413 , 179 A.2d 649 (1962). The appellant appeared at, but did not participate in, the board hearing.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Boundary Drive Associates v. Shrewsbury Township Board of Supervisors

    81 Pa. Commw. 7 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 1984

    Schubach v. Silver, 461 Pa. 366 , 336 A.2d 328 (1975). In Village of Euclid v. … See Hopewell Township Board of Supervisors v. Golla, 499 Pa. 246 , 452 A.2d 1337 (1982); Hopewell Township Board of Supervisors v. Golla, 58 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 572 , 428 A.2d 701 (1980).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • County of Lehigh v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

    76 Pa. Commw. 641 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 1, 1983

    Bradley v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 479 Pa. 440 , 388 A.2d 736 (1978), Sweet v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 479 Pa. 449 , 388 A.2d 740 (1978), Board of Judges v. … See, AFSCME v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 62 Pa.

    Reversed by County of Lehigh v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 507 Pa. 270 (1985)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • West Penn Power Co. v. Board of Property Assessment

    80 Pa. Commw. 378 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 22, 1984

    Valley Forge Racing Association, Inc. v. State Horse Racing Commission, 449 Pa. 292, 295 , 297 A.2d 823, 824 (1972). … Coleman v. Board of Education of the School District of Philadelphia, 477 Pa. 414 , 383 A.2d 1275 (1978); Rizzo v. Schmanek, 63 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 547 , 439 A.2d 1296 (1981).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Bernard S. Pincus Co.

    24 Pa. Commw. 655 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 28, 1976

    Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Ayers Philadelphia, Inc., 23 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 249 , 351 A.2d 306 (1976) ; Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Kanell Jewelers, Inc., 22 Pa. … Commonwealth Ct. 1 , 347 A.2d 500 (1975); Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Auto Express, Inc., 21 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 559 , 346 A.2d 829 (1975); Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Philadelphia Gas Works v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    671 A.2d 264 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 1996

    Peoples First National Bank v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 159 Pa.Cmwlth. 134 , 632 A.2d 1014 (1993). . … Mormak v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 135 Pa.Cmwlth. 232 , 579 A.2d 1383 (1990).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Craftex Mills, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Markowicz)

    901 A.2d 1077 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 2006

    Gomori v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 61 Pa.Cmwlth. 164 , 433 A.2d 142 (1981). … Purex, Inc. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Oden), 70 Pa.Cmwlth.548, 454 A.2d 203 (1982).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Borough of Coaldale v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    745 A.2d 728 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 7, 2000

    Comitalo v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 737 A.2d 342 (Pa.Cmwlth.1999). The Board’s findings of fact are.conclusive upon appeal if the record contains substantial evidence to support them. Taylor v. … Homan v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 107 Pa.Cmwlth. 172 , 527 A.2d 1109 (1987).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Seven Stars Farm, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    935 A.2d 921 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 2007

    We did, however, address that issue in Kuemmerle v. … Morris v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Philadelphia Suburban Development Corp. v. Scranton Zoning Hearing Board

    41 A.3d 630 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 5, 2012

    In Ellis v. … Hess v. Warwick Township Zoning Hearing Board, 977 A.2d 1216, 1224 (Pa.Cmwlth.2009).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Neimeic v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    59 Pa. Commw. 604 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 1981

    This is not a case like Break N Eat Corporation v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 42 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 586 , 401 A.2d 423 (1979) and Mileski v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 32 Pa. … We note that Boulware v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 47 Pa.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Graves v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Philadelphia Housing Authority)

    983 A.2d 241 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 2009

    Waronsky v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Mellon Bank), 958 A.2d 1118, 1123 (Pa.Cmwlth.2008) (citing Inglis House v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Reedy), 535 Pa. 135 , 634 A.2d 592 (1993)). . … City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Brown), 830 A.2d 649 , 653 n. 2 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003). .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • City of Wilkes-Barre v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    868 A.2d 620 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 18, 2005

    See also Bureau of Workers’ Compensation v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Lukens Steel Co.), 105 Pa.Cmwlth.421, 524 A.2d 1041 (1987). … Fund v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Shaughnessy), 837 A.2d 697, 702 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003), appeal granted, — Pa. —, 860 A.2d 491 (2004) (quoting Wausau Ins. Companies v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • East Torresdale Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    147 Pa. Commw. 35 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 1992

    Valley View Civic Association v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 501 Pa. 550 , 462 A.2d 637 (1983). … Goodman v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Philadelphia, 132 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 298, 572 A.2d 848 (1990). .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wengert v. Zoning Hearing Board of Upper Merion Township

    51 Pa. Commw. 79 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 1980

    The Zoning Hearing Board (Board) denied the request. … This case is controlled by this Court’s decision'in Pennsylvania George Junior Republic v. Zoning Hearing Board of Coolspring Township, 37 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 151 , 389 A.2d 261 (1978).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Philadelphia Correctional Officers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

    667 A.2d 459 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 1995

    Philadelphia Correctional Officers Assn. v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (No. 2001 C.D. 1992, filed June 11, 1993). … AFSCME, Council 13, AFL-CIO v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 150 Pa. Cmwlth. 642, 616 A.2d 135 (1992). .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Federici v. Borough of Oakmont Zoning Hearing Board

    136 Pa. Commw. 310 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 28, 1990

    The above conclusion is buttressed by Trush v. Township of Bensalem, 56 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 232 , 424 A.2d 988 (1981), wherein this Court quoted Jersild v. … Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 501 Pa. 550 , 462 A.2d 637 (1983). A conclusion that the Board abused its discretion may be reached only if its findings are not supported by substantial evidence.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • 1050 Ashbourne Associates, LLC v. Cheltenham Township Board of Commissioners

    167 A.3d 828 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 1, 2017

    Kassouf v. … The relevant cases are Raum, 370 A.2d 777; Highway Materials, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of Whitemarsh Township, 974 A.2d 539 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2009); and Honey Brook Estates, LLC v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Champion Home Builders Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    136 Pa. Commw. 612 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 13, 1990

    Smith’s Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Gladfelter), 113 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 25, 535 A.2d 1259 (1988). … Smith’s Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Gladfelter). The reason why Dr.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Bendix Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    3 Pa. Commw. 307 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1971

    The second hearing which was ordered on the Board’s own motion was necessary because the Board found that the record “is insufficient to make a proper factual determination under the law”. … The Board which considered this case was composed of two members.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.