Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspacommwct

10,000+ results

0.32s

  • Philadelphia Gas Works v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    819 A.2d 1230 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2003

    Second, it asserts that the Board failed to provide adequate reasoning to justify its determination of the range most WCJs would award. In Hastings Indus. v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeal Bd. … See also City of Philadelphia v. Workers’ Comp. Appeal Bd. (Doherty), 716 A.2d 704 (Pa.Cmwlth.1998).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • K-Mart Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    141 Pa. Commw. 375 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 22, 1991

    The referee’s decision was affirmed by the Board. … Spotts v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Superior Tube Company), 116 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 304, 541 A.2d 446 (1988). In this case, we conclude that the testimony of Claimant’s medical expert, Dr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ulsh v. Zoning Hearing Board of Lower Paxton Township

    22 A.3d 244 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 2011

    A zoning hearing board’s findings are, accordingly, rendered irrelevant. See Nextel Partners, Inc. v. … Based upon that language, this Court has stated that “a deemed zoning board approval no more cuts off the right to an appeal on the merits than would a timely board decision approving an application.” Gryshuk v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Hughes v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    67 Pa. Commw. 63 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 1982

    . *65 In Katz v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 59 Pa. … In Peda v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 64 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 184 , 439 A.2d 888 (1982) we held that this issue could be raised, although not briefed, at oral argument.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • M. Gordon & Sons, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    14 Pa. Commw. 288 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 13, 1974

    Maston v. Union Mining Co., 9 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 586 , 309 A.2d 67 (1973); New Standard Corp. and Insurance Co. of North America v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board and Miller, 9 Pa. … See Royal Pioneer Ind., Inc. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 11 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 132 , 309 A.2d 831 (1973). This case is unlike Riley Stoker Corporation v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Pennsylvania State Police v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    694 A.2d 1181 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 1997

    Bradshaw v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Bell Hearing Aid Center), 163 Pa.Cmwlth.486, 641 A.2d 664 (1994). … Setley v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Kawecki Berylco Industries), 69 Pa.Cmwlth. 241 , 451 A.2d 10 (1982).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of Commonwealth v. Tate

    22 Pa. Commw. 4 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1975

    Tate (Claimant) from a decision and order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which affirmed an order of the referee denying unemployment compensation pursuant to Section 402(b)(1) of the Unemployment … Therel0re" We ORDER And Now, this 17th day of November, 1975, the Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review is hereby affirmed.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Anastasio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (NGK Metals Corp.)

    713 A.2d 116 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 5, 1997

    Buczynski v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Richardson-Vicks, Inc.), 133 Pa. Cmwlth. 532, 576 A.2d 421 (1990). As we stated in Sellari v. … However, under the guidance of Drop v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (U.S.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Torak v. Board of Adjustment of Upper Merion Township

    2 Pa. Commw. 48 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 5, 1971

    Opinion Per Curiam, The order affirming the Board of Adjustment of Upper Merion Township in denying appellants’ request for a variance is affirmed upon the opinion of Judge William W.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Commonwealth, Board of Finance & Revenue

    53 Pa. Commw. 116 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 1980

    Johnson Co. v. Commonwealth, 50 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 111 , 411 A.2d 1315 (1980) for this proposition. *124 In R. G. … Charles Riebe Construction Co. v. Commonwealth, 17 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 508 , 333 A.2d 226 (1975).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    109 Pa. Commw. 565 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 1987

    Estate of McGovern v. State Employees Retirement Board, 512 Pa. 377 , 517 A.2d 523 (1986). The burden of proving entitlement to benefits on a claim petition is, of course, on the claimant. … The Board, in reversing the referees denial of benefits, relied upon Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Vepco Construction Co.), 91 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 543 , 498 A.2d 36 (1985), and Farkaly v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Berks County Intermediate Unit v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    158 Pa. Commw. 305 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 3, 1993

    In Murhon v. … Lewis v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 508 Pa. 360 , 498 A.2d 800 (1985).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Kmart Corp. v. Washington County Board of Assessment Appeals

    950 A.2d 1089 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 9, 2008

    Board of Assessment Appeals, 67 Wash. … First Korean Church of New York, Inc. v. Montgomery County Board of Assessment Appeals, 926 A.2d 543 (Pa.Cmwlth.2006). 7 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wells/Richard Manufacturing Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    69 Pa. Commw. 179 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 1982

    In Penn Cambria School District v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 52 Pa. … Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Auto Express, Inc., 21 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 559 , 346 A.2d 629 (1975).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Crown, Cork & Seal Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    117 Pa. Commw. 242 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 1988

    See Murhon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 51 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 214 , 414 A.2d 161 (1980). This Court recently considered and rejected a similar argument in Budd Trailer Company v. … LoRubbio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 49 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 529 , 411 A.2d 866 (1980), citing American Refrigerator Equipment Company v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 31 Pa.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Gress v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    81 Pa. Commw. 591 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1984

    Redevelopment Authority of the City of Dauphin v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 45 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 597 , 405 A.2d 1061 (1979), is inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s holding in Genetin v. … Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 499 Pa. 125 , 451 A.2d 1353 (1982).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cellco Partnership v. North Annville Township Zoning Hearing Board

    939 A.2d 430 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 2007

    Deference is owed to a zoning board’s understanding of its own ordinance. Broussard v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Pittsburgh, 589 Pa. 71, 81 , 907 A.2d 494, 500 (2006) (citation omitted). … Macioce v. Zoning Hearing Board of the Borough of Baldwin, 850 A.2d 882, 887 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Stanley Lojak Contractor v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    661 A.2d 923 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 1995

    Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (United Parcel Services), 133 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 455, 576 A.2d 1163 (1990), and Thomas v. … Hawkins v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Medical College of Pennsylvania), 138 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 180, 587 A.2d 387 (1991); Bell Telephone Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board of the Commonwealth v. Kennedy

    21 Pa. Commw. 76 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 11, 1975

    The referee and the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board denied the claim because it was filed beyond the sixteen-month period specified in the statute of limitations in effect at the time of the injury. … See generally Chase v. Emery Manufacturing Co., 271 Pa. 265 , 113 A. 840 (1921); Revilak v. Coca Cola Co. of Pennsylvania, 152 Pa. Superior Ct. 508 , 33 A. 2d 287 (1943); Cotton v. John Wood Mfg. Co., supra; Elkins v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lincoln v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    53 Pa. Commw. 643 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1980

    Chiango v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 33 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 610 , 382 A.2d 789 (1978). … McLean v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 476 Pa. 617 , 383 A.2d 533 (1978); Curtis v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 32 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 462 , 379 A.2d 1069 (1977).

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.