Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspacommwct

10,000+ results

1.19s

  • Cohen v. Board of Pharmacy

    4 Pa. Commw. 398 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1972

    See e.g., State Board of Medical Education and Licensure v. Ferry, 172 Pa. Superior Ct. 372 , 94 A. 2d 121 (1953), affirming 61 Dauph. 260 (1950). … Therefore, by his own standards, Cohen was guilty of unprofessional conduct In State Board of Osteopathic Examiners of Pennsylvania v. Berberian, 200 Pa.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    103 A.3d 397 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 30, 2014

    In support of this conclusion, the WCJ cited this Court’s decision in Lookout Volunteer Fire Company v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Savercool), 53 Pa.Cmwlth. 528 , 418 A.2d 802 (1980). … This conclusion is consistent with our decision in Westmoreland Regional Hospital v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Pickford), 29 A.3d 120 (Pa.Cmwlth.2011).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Tranguch v. Zoning Hearing Board

    95 Pa. Commw. 369 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 4, 1986

    Where the court of common pleas received no additional evidence, our scope of review is that of Whether the board committed a manifest abuse of discretion or an error of law. Rees v. … In any event, we are unable to determine from the board’s order- on what basis the board made its decision.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Washington v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    11 A.3d 48 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 2011

    Davis v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Swarthmore Borough), 561 Pa. 462 , 751 A.2d 168 (2000); Wilson; Martin v. … See, e.g., Payes v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Commonwealth of PA/State Police), 5 A.3d 855 (Pa.Cmwlth.2010); Rydzewski v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Mostatab v. State Board of Dentistry

    881 A.2d 1271 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 31, 2005

    Chene v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Giant Eagle), 159 Pa.Cmwlth.229, 632 A.2d 1058 (1993), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 539 Pa. 639 , 650 A.2d 53 (1994). … McGrath v. State Board of Dentistry, 159 Pa.Cmwlth. 159 , 632 A.2d 1027 (1993).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hilyer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    847 A.2d 232 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 2004

    Lehigh County Vo-Tech School v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Wolfe), 539 Pa. 322 , 652 A.2d 797 (1995). … Gardner v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Genesis Health Ventures), 814 A.2d 884 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Ball v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    19 Pa. Commw. 157 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 22, 1975

    In Weidner v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 16 Pa. … Hartman v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, .... Pa. Commonwealth Ct....., 333 A. 2d 819 (1975).

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Puleo v. Zoning Hearing Board

    722 A.2d 789 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1999

    See D’Emilio v. Board of Supervisors, 157 Pa.Cmwlth. 64 , 628 A.2d 1230 (Pa.Cmwlth.1993). … Pittsburgh Trust for Cultural Resources v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 145 Pa.Cmwlth. 503 , 604 A.2d 298 (Pa.Cmwlth.1992), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 538 Pa. 618 , 645 A.2d 1320 (1994). 3 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Berk v. Zoning Hearing Board

    16 Pa. Commw. 48 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 9, 1974

    The zoning hearing board determined that the proposed supermarket did not constitute a "similar retail business,” and accordingly refused to grant a special exception. … After a careful review of the record and the applicable law, we find neither an abuse of discretion nor an error of *50 law in the Zoning Hearing Board’s determination, and so we affirm.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Green v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    28 A.3d 936 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 22, 2011

    (Brown), 830 A.2d 649 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003) (affirming a Board and WCJ determination that a claimant suffered a work-related acceleration of a pre-existing degenerative joint disease of the left knee, 5 *941 and the resulting … Notably, in Brown, the credited medical diagnosis was somewhat similar to the diagnosis at issue in the instant matter.'

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Dotterer v. Zoning Hearing Board

    138 Pa. Commw. 615 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 1991

    Contrast King v. Perkasie Borough Zoning Hearing Board, 122 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 510, 552 A.2d 354 (1989). … See Baronoff v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Board of School Directors

    16 Pa. Commw. 175 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 3, 1974

    Appellants rely on Welsko v. … Board of Directors of the School District of Scranton v. Roberts, 13 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 464 , 320 A. 2d 141 (1974).

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Szmigiel v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    6 Pa. Commw. 632 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 8, 1972

    Filanowski v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 439 Pa. 360 , 266 A. 2d 670 (1970); Pyzdrowski v. Pittsburgh Board of Adjustment, 437 Pa. 481 , 263 A. 2d 426 (1970). … As the Supreme Court said in Gold v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Bruckner v. Workmens Compensation Appeal Board

    104 Pa. Commw. 290 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1987

    City of Hazleton v. Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (DeCusatis), 35 Pa. … Co. v. Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Gross), 69 Pa.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Wetzel v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    92 A.3d 130 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2014

    See, Stevens v. … (Board Op. at 10 n. 6) (citing Penn State University v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Boehm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    133 Pa. Commw. 455 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 13, 1990

    The Board, in affirming the referee, relied upon Mangine v. … Lukens, Inc. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Hasiey), 91 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 55, 496 A.2d 895 (1985).

    Cited 60 timesPublished
  • McGaffin v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    903 A.2d 94 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 19, 2006

    Benson v. WCAB (Haverford State Hosp.), 668 A.2d 244 (Pa.Cmwlth.1995).” (Bd. Decision at 4.) The Board concluded that “because the WCJ accepted as credible Dr. … But see, Musko v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Calgon Carbon Corporation), 729 A.2d 657 , 659 n. 6 (Pa. Cmwlth.1999).

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Loose v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    144 Pa. Commw. 332 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 1991

    Moats v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Emerald Mines Corporation), 138 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 449, 588 A.2d 116 (1991); Brown v. … Moody v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Philadelphia Inquirer), 127 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 65, 560 A.2d 925 (1989); M.A. Bruder & Son, Inc. v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    121 Pa. Commw. 436 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 1988

    Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Corning Glass Works), 515 Pa. 315 , 528 A.2d 580 (1987); Odgers v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 514 Pa. 378 , 525 A.2d 359 (1987); and Estate of McGovern v. … See also Yuhas v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh), 82 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 390 , 476 A.2d 1377 (1984); Dennis v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 55 Pa.

    Cited 367 timesPublished
  • Nevitt v. Board of Supervisors

    32 Pa. Commw. 474 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 1977

    The Court of Common Pleas of Blair County affirmed the action of the Board of Supervisors. We affirm. The facts are not substantially in dispute. … We find nothing in the present case that requires a result different from our decisions in Homan v. Civil Service Commission, 28 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 426 , 368 A.2d 883 (1977) and McCarthy v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.