Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspacommwct

10,000+ results

2.59s

  • Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    686 A.2d 871 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 1996

    Estate of McGovern v. State Employees’ Retirement Board, 512 Pa. 377 , 517 A.2d 523 (1986). … Behory v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Bethenergy Mines, Inc.), 166 Pa.Cmwlth.66, 646 A.2d 31, 33 (1994). Accordingly, the decision of the Board is affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Greco v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

    99 Pa. Commw. 107 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 22, 1986

    Petitioner cites Commonwealth v. Brown, 503 Pa. 514 , 469 A.2d 1371 (1983), in support of his argument. … In defining collateral estoppel, the court in Brown adopted the definition promulgated by the United States Supreme Court in Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436 *111 (1970).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Weis Markets, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    132 Pa. Commw. 345 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1990

    Universal Trucking, Inc. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Hassell), 112 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 428, 535 A.2d 722 (1988). *349 1. … Clark Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 49 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 535, 411 A.2d 1269 (1980).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Carolina Freight Carriers v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    723 A.2d 739 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 13, 1999

    Whiteside v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Unisys Corp.), 168 Pa.Cmwlth.488, 650 A.2d 1202 (Pa.Cmwlth.1994), appeal denied, 544 Pa. 650 , 664 A.2d 978 (1995). … See Jaskiewicz v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (James D. Morrisey, Inc.), 651 A.2d 623 (Pa.Cmwlth. 1994), appeal denied, 541 Pa. 628 , 661 A.2d 875 (1995).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Consol Pa Coal Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    654 A.2d 292 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1995

    Shelestak v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Bethlehem Mines Corporation), 131 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 582, 571 A.2d 516 (1990). … Casuccio v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Scheidemantle), 72 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 270, 456 A.2d 1117 (1983). Thus, the primary issue is whether the credible evidence presented by Dr.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Mosites Construction Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    164 Pa. Commw. 60 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 10, 1994

    Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Atlas Chain & Precision Products Co.), 73 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 644, 459 A.2d 458 (1983). Employer further argues that the referee and the WCAB applied McGlasson v. … Further, while paragraph 2 of Section 309(d) often applies where a claimant does not have full-time work available, see McStay v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Alex L.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brenner v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    75 Pa. Commw. 428 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 1983

    See Treon v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Pa. , 453 A.2d 960 (1982). … We will, therefore, vacate the Board’s order and remand for evidentiary proceedings. Spinelli v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 63 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 358 , 437 A.2d 1320 (1981); Fontana v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. G.M. & W. Coal Co.

    29 Pa. Commw. 138 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 1977

    In Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Jeddo Highland Coal Company, 19 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 90, 93 , 338 A.2d 744, 746 (1975), an award was sought for a fatal heart attack. … Borough of Aliquippa v. Mansuetti, 18 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 340 , 336 A.2d 450 (1975).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • D. Mabin, R.N. v. BPOA, State Board of Nursing

    Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 6, 2018

    IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Darlene Mabin, R.N., : Petitioner : : v. … : No. 1763 C.D. 2017 : Bureau of Professional and : Occupational Affairs, State : Board of Nursing, :

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kramer v. State Board of Auctioneer Examiners

    978 A.2d 1079 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 14, 2009

    Board’s Decision, at 13. The Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence of record. … Our review of a Board's decision is limited to determining whether constitutional rights were violated, an error of law committed, or whether necessary findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence. Bunch v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wiley v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    78 Pa. Commw. 197 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 3, 1983

    8, 1979 are also chargeable to the Board. … Accordingly, the Board’s denial of administrative relief from its decision to recommit Petitioner as a technical parole violator is reversed. See Capers v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 42 Pa.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • St. Joseph Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    725 A.2d 1287 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1999

    Truck Lubricating & Washing Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 54 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 495, 421 A.2d 1251 (1980). … Crucible, Inc. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Pope), 120 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 564, 549 A.2d 258 (1988).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Four-Way Construction Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    113 Pa. Commw. 235 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 3, 1988

    Barrett v. Otis Elevator Company, 431 Pa. 446 , 246 A.2d 668 (1968). … Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Vepco Construction Co.), 516 Pa. 240 , 532 A.2d 374 (1987) and Farkaly v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Baltimore Life Insurance Company), 516 Pa. 256 , 532 A.2d 382 (1987).

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Ruth Family Medical Center v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    718 A.2d 397 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 1998

    Hawkins v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Medical College of Pennsylvania), 138 Pa.Cmwlth. 180 , 587 A.2d 387 (1991). In Shaffer v. … Northeastern Hospital v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Turiano), 134 Pa. Cmwlth. 164, 578 A.2d 83 (1990); Lehman v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Gaetani v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    96 Pa. Commw. 410 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1986

    Opinion by Senior Judge Barbieri, Silvio Gaetani, Claimant, appeals here the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirming the referees decision which denied Claimant benefits pursuant to the doctrine … The Board affirmed the referees decision and the instant appeal ensued.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Chillisquaque Creek Watershed Ass'n v. Sanitary Water Board

    2 Pa. Commw. 561 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 2, 1971

    Appellants state that such action is an abuse of the Board’s discretion. … The rationale of this line of cases is discussed at length by Chief Justice Stern in Blumenschein v. Pittsburgh Housing Authority, 379 Pa. 566 , 109 A. 2d 331 (1954).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bedford Somerset MHMR v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Turner)

    51 A.3d 267 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 2012

    See Howrie v. Workers’ Comp. Appeal Bd. (CMC Equip. … See Sell v. Workers’ Comp. Appeal Bd.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • B.P. Oil Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    167 Pa. Commw. 661 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 1994

    Boeing Helicopter Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (McCanney), 157 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 76, 82, 629 A.2d 184, 187 (1993) (footnote omitted). … Lastoka v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.), 51 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 310, 413 A.2d 481 (1980).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Blair v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    71 Pa. Commw. 366 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 1983

    and Parole (Board) and against the petitioner, Joseph Blair. … By order of the Supreme Court dated April 17, 1980, our order was vacated and the case was remanded to this Court for further consideration in the light of Bronson v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    717 A.2d 26 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 20, 1998

    Initially, we note that our Supreme Court in Hastings Industries v. … The Court observed that review by the Board in disfigurement cases “serves the salutary end of promoting a reasonable degree of uniformity in disfigurement awards.” Id. In LTV Steel v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.