Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.38s
Township of Upper Saucon v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
152 Pa. Commw. 530 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1993
See e.g., City of Clairton v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 107 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 561, 528 A.2d 1048 (1987). … Accord Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 138 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 113, 119 n. 7, 588 A.2d 67 , 70 n. 7 (1991), appeal denied, 528 Pa. 632 , 598 A.2d 285 (1991) (citing Harbaugh v.
Cited 25 timesPublishedGeneral Electric Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
79 Pa. Commw. 91 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1983
The board affirmed. General Electric contends that, despite our Supreme Court’s decision in Krawchuk v. … See, e.g., Marincov v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 71 Pa.
Cited 2 timesPublishedStingray, L.P. v. Concord Township Zoning Hearing Board
975 A.2d 1208 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 2009
Board’s Decision and Order at 35; R.R. 37a. … Where the trial court has taken no additional evidence, the scope of review is generally limited to whether a zoning hearing board committed an abuse of discretion or an error of law. Valley View Civic Association v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEllison v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
60 Pa. Commw. 451 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 10, 1981
Taylor v. … Borman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 12 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 241 , 316 A.2d 679 (1974).
Cited 1 timesPublishedGiant Eagle, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
168 Pa. Commw. 595 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 1994
Whether to grant or deny a rehearing is within the discretion of the Board, and our scope of review is limited to determining whether the Board has abused that discretion. Douglas v. … Under this provision, this court has previously remanded cases in which the Board's order is contradictory and unintelligible. See Newton v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedButtonwood Farms v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
60 Pa. Commw. 357 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 7, 1981
State Workmen’s Insurance Fund v. Young, 2 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 423, 427-28 , 276 A.2d 552, 555 (1971) (quoting Chilcote v. Leidy, 207 Pa. Superior Ct. 345, 349 , 217 A.2d 764, 766 (1966)). Dr. … See, e.g., Pennwalt Stokes Div. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 44 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 98, 403 A.2d 186 (1979); Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Universal Cyclops, 20 Pa.
Cited 1 timesPublishedJardine v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
36 Pa. Commw. 344 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 1978
Order And Now, this 28th day of June, 1978, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review dated February 7, 1977 is affirmed. See McNally v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 34 Pa. … Commonwealth Ct. 122 , 382 A.2d 1285 (1978) ; Barrett v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 30 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 429 , 373 A.2d 1183 (1977), and the cases cited therein.
Cited 1 timesPublishedH.M. Stauffer & Sons, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
687 A.2d 869 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 1996
Ryan v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Port Erie Plastics, Inc.), 162 Pa.Cmwlth. 411 , 639 A.2d 866 (1994); York Terrace/Beverly Enterprises v. … Farkaly v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedWestinghouse Elevator Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
137 Pa. Commw. 293 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 1991
As the Board’s orders in this case require the employer to make payments in excess of that figure, we believe the Board has committed an error of law and must be reversed. … The respondents cite Builders Exchange, Inc. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedPiper Group, Inc. v. Bedminster Township Board of Supervisors
992 A.2d 224 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 2010
C & M Developers, Inc. v. Bedminster Township Zoning Hearing Board, 573 Pa. 2 , 820 A.2d 143 (2002). … Id.; see also Horn v. Hilltown Twp., 461 Pa. 745 , 337 A.2d 858, 859-60 (1975), Sultanik v. Board of Sup’rs of Worcester Tp., 88 Pa.Cmwlth. 214 , 488 A.2d 1197 (1985).
Cited 11 timesPublishedWorkmen's Compensation Appeal Board of the Commonwealth v. Commonwealth
19 Pa. Commw. 492 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 1975
Opinion by Judge Wilkinson, This case involves substantially the same issue as was raised in Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board and Klebiek v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 19 Pa. … Accordingly, we enter the following Order Now, June 5, 1975, the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, dated January 6,1975, affirming the referee’s award of compensation to Marcella Farkas and Julius Farkas,
Cited 2 timesPublishedJim Jay Enterprises, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board
91 A.3d 274 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 2014
Two *284 Sophia’s Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 799 A.2d 917 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002). … Lodge 151 v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 969 A.2d 642 (Pa.Cmwlth.2009).
Cited 4 timesPublishedCarpentertown Coal & Coke Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
154 Pa. Commw. 408 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 1993
If, in fact, this is the case, a termination of benefits would be warranted, see, e.g., Brown v. … Brown; Rogers Motor Lines Inc. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Baker), 144 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 493, 601 A.2d 934 (1992).
Cited 16 timesPublishedBoard of Supervisors v. Centre Hills County Club
18 Pa. Commw. 40 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1975
The Board of Supervisors, after hearing, granted tentative approval of the plan with conditions, one of which provides the issue in this case — that the total density or number of dwelling units to be constructed should not … The section cited however, 2-B(4), provides that “the Board of Supervisors may also permit such additional uses as churches, public schools, golf courses and community clubs, provided they are designed to serve primarily
Cited 2 timesPublishedLewis v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
72 Pa. Commw. 398 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1983
Opinion by Judge MacPhail, Joseph Lewis (Petitioner) has filed a petition for review with this Court in its appellate jurisdiction. 1 The petition avers that the Board of Probation and Parole (Board) failed to hold within … In response to the minimum due process requirements for parole violation and revocation hearings as set forth in Morrissey v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedAl's Radiator Service v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
157 Pa. Commw. 432 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 2, 1993
Songer, Inc. v. Work *438 men’s Compensation Appeal Board, 149 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 578, 613 A.2d 658 (1992). … In Whitehead v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedSouth Hills Movers v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
829 A.2d 1263 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 13, 2003
Westerwald Pottery Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal *1266 Board (Watters), 692 A.2d 1145, 1148 (Pa.Cmwlth.1997). … Id. at 1148 [citing Dilkus v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeal Bd. (John F. Martin & Sons), 543 Pa. 392 , 671 A.2d 1135 (1996) ]. Employer relies on Davis v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (H.M.
Cited 2 timesPublishedJones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
92 Pa. Commw. 318 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 1985
Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Denny, 25 Pa. … Weidner v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 16 Pa.
Cited 12 timesPublishedMotor Coils MFG/Wabtec v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
853 A.2d 1082 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 2004
See USAir, Inc. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Keene), 706 A.2d 888 (Pa.Cmwlth. 1998); City of Pittsburgh v. … Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Click), 823 A.2d 284 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003); South Hills Health System v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Kiefer), 806 A.2d 962 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002); Darrall v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedBlakeslee Aluminum, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
740 A.2d 1213 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 1999
Claimant appealed to the Board and alleged that the Job was not available to him under the standard set forth in Kachinski v. … Vinglinsky v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Penn Installation), 139 Pa.Cmwlth. 15 , 589 A.2d 291 (1991).
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna