Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspacommwct

10,000+ results

1.64s

  • Westinghouse Electric Corp./CBS v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    838 A.2d 831 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 2003

    Cittrich v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Laurel Living Center), 688 A.2d 1258 (Pa.Cmwlth.1997). … Coover v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Browning-Ferns Industries of Delaware Valley), 140 Pa.Cmwlth.16, 591 A.2d 347 (1991).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • York Terrace/Beverly Enterprises v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    140 Pa. Commw. 75 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 16, 1991

    Lukens, Inc. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Williams), 130 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 479, 568 A.2d 981 (1981). … Investors Diversified Services v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Howar), 103 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 562, 520 A.2d 958 (1987).

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • DOS v. A. Brown

    Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 2015

    licensed by the State Board of Medicine (Board)] pursuant to 40 P.S. §1303.903(1).”2 (Brown’s Req., 10/14/14, at 1.) … ,” including the Board.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Geisel v. Pennsylvania State Board of Funeral Directors

    755 A.2d 750 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 2000

    McKinley v. State Board of Funeral Directors, 11 Pa.Cmwlth. 241 , 313 A.2d 180 (1973). . … Sweeny v. State Board of Funeral Directors, 666 A.2d 1137 (Pa.Cmwlth.1995). . Geisel also argues that Ciavarelli v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kohr v. Lower Windsor Township Board of Supervisors

    867 A.2d 755 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 9, 2005

    In Muhlenberg College v. Zoning Hearing Board of the City of Allentown, 760 A.2d 443 (Pa.Cmwlth.2000), our Court reviewed Section 609(c) of the MPC. … Skepton v. Borough of Wilson, 562 Pa. 344 , 755 A.2d 1267 (2000). .The trial court also found that the Board failed to comply with Section 607(c) of the MPC.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Duquesne Light Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    69 Pa. Commw. 331 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1982

    In Findlay Refractories v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 52 Pa. … Order The order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, No.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    677 A.2d 857 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 21, 1996

    Estate of McGovern v. State Employees’ Retirement Board, 512 Pa. 377 , 517 A.2d 523 (1986). … In Pawlosky v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bethlehem Structural Products v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Vernon)

    789 A.2d 767 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2001

    Harper & Collins v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Brown), 543 Pa. 484 , 672 A.2d 1319 (1996). The order of the Board is affirmed. … ABF Freight Systems, Inc. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Iten), 744 A.2d 348 (Pa. Cmwlth.2000). 3 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Seibert v. WEST VINCENT TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

    929 A.2d 1274 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 2007

    929 A.2d 1274 (2007) SEIBERT v. WEST VINCENT TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. No. 620CD07. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. August 15, 2007. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Globe Lining, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    121 Pa. Commw. 68 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 10, 1988

    Penn Pad Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Altholz), 83 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 490 , 478 A.2d 497 (1984). There is no dispute that Decedent met the first two criteria of Penn Pad. … S and S Associates, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Hochman), 77 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 11 , 465 A.2d 57 (1983).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • City of Pittsburgh v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    108 Pa. Commw. 477 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 14, 1987

    Estate of McGovern v. State Employees’ Retirement Board, 512 Pa. 377 , 517 A.2d 523 (1986). … It specifically cites Weaver v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Ribstone Silos of Pennsylvania), 90 Pa.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Lent v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    83 Pa. Commw. 535 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 9, 1984

    A referee and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirmed this decision. The claimant at the time of separation from employment received a copy of Booklet No. … Westfall v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 32 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 619 , 379 A.2d 1389 (1977).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ellison v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    60 Pa. Commw. 451 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 10, 1981

    Taylor v. … Borman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 12 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 241 , 316 A.2d 679 (1974).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Rochester & Pittsburgh Coal Co.

    23 Pa. Commw. 441 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 23, 1976

    Opinion by Judge Wilkinson, This case is an appeal by Rochester and Pittsburgh Coal Company and its insurance carrier (appellants) from a determination of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board). … This finding is supported by substantial evidence and was, therefore, binding on the Board, as it is on this Court. See Page’s Department Store v. Velardi, Pa. , 346 A.2d 556 (1975).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    168 Pa. Commw. 595 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 1994

    Whether to grant or deny a rehearing is within the discretion of the Board, and our scope of review is limited to determining whether the Board has abused that discretion. Douglas v. … Under this provision, this court has previously remanded cases in which the Board's order is contradictory and unintelligible. See Newton v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Toth v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    78 Pa. Commw. 19 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 1983

    Opinion by Judge MacPhail, In Bronson v. … Counsel refers to Commonwealth v. McClendon,. 495 Pa. 467 . 434 A.2d 1185 (1981) and Scott v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Pa. Commonwealth Ct. , 463 A.2d 110 (1983).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • H.M. Stauffer & Sons, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    687 A.2d 869 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 1996

    Ryan v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Port Erie Plastics, Inc.), 162 Pa.Cmwlth. 411 , 639 A.2d 866 (1994); York Terrace/Beverly Enterprises v. … Farkaly v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Balady Farms, LLC v. Paradise Township Zoning Hearing Board

    148 A.3d 496 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 2016

    Velocity Express v. Pa. … Borough of Fleetwood v. Zoning Hearing B[d.] of Borough of Fleetwood, . . . 649 A.2d 651, 656 ([Pa.] 1994); see Beers ex rel. P/O/A Beers v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Tennyson v. Zoning Hearing Board of West Bradford Township

    952 A.2d 739 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 2008

    See *748 also Koresko v. Farley, 844 A.2d 607, 616 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004) (“A private landowner’s right to sue lies not in the MPC, but under restrictive covenant.”); Fayette County v. … Risker v. Smith Township Zoning Hearing Board, 886 A.2d 727, 731, n. 5 (Pa.Cmwlth.2005). . As the fact-finder, it is the ZHB which judges the credibility of witnesses and the weight afforded to their testimony.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Lynch v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF MAXATAWNY TOWNSHIP

    964 A.2d 507 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 2009

    964 A.2d 507 (2009) LYNCH v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF MAXATAWNY TOWNSHIP. No. 809CD08. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. January 28, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.