Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspacommwct

10,000+ results

1.26s

  • Lutes v. Fayette County Board of Assessment Appeals

    936 A.2d 573 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 2007

    In Jordan this Court cited Murtagh v. … See Stranahan v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • County of Delaware v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

    735 A.2d 131 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 16, 1999

    See Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 74 Pa.Cmwlth. 1 , 459 A.2d 452 (1983). … Moreover, in City of Pittsburgh v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Oldynski v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    57 Pa. Commw. 285 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 4, 1981

    Pollard v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 33 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 645 , 382 A.2d 791 (1978). It is true that in Frumento v. … See Lee v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 42 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 461 , 401 A.2d 12 (1979); D’Ambrosi v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 39 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 278 , 395 A.2d 627 (1978); Boob v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Township of Warminster v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    77 Pa. Commw. 155 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 14, 1983

    Gigliottis Restaurant and Pizzeria v. Workmens Compensation Appeal Board, 64 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 642 , 441 A.2d 504 (1982). … Steinle v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Mramor), 38 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 241 , 393 A.2d 503 (1978).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • West Hanover Township v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

    166 Pa. Commw. 260 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 27, 1994

    Independent Association of Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board Employees v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 48 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 342, 409 A.2d 532 (1980). … In disagreeing with the PLRB’s determination, the trial court and the township rely upon our decision in Amalgamated Transit Union Local # 89 v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 92 Pa.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Maldonado v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    94 Pa. Commw. 149 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 10, 1986

    Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 466 Pa. 81 , 351 A.2d 631 (1976). … In Green v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 61 Pa.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • City of Nanticoke v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    828 A.2d 462 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 10, 2003

    Scher v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (City of Philadelphia), 740 A.2d 741, 750 (Pa.Cmwlth.1999), citing Weiss v. … Vinglinsky v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Penn Installation), 139 Pa.Cmwlth. 15 , 589 A.2d 291 (1991). 3 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Mosaica Education, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Appeals Board

    925 A.2d 176 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 8, 2007

    Mosaica Education, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Appeals Board (Mosaica I), 836 A.2d 185, 186 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003) (footnotes omitted) (emphasis added). … On August 14, 2006, the Board issued its decision, finding that the work performed for the School was covered under the Wage Act. The Board noted that in Brackbill v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Harrison v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Commonwealth of Pennsylvania)

    165 A.3d 1019 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 2017

    Id. *1025 In support of his position, Claimant cites City of Philadelphia Gas Works v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Amodei), 964 A.2d 963 (Pa. … Claimant also cites our decision in City of Philadelphia v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Harvey), 994 A.2d 1 (Pa.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Kiger v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    88 Pa. Commw. 376 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 1985

    Opinion by Judge Palladino, This appeal is brought by Cynthia Niger (Claimant) from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision denying Claimant’s benefits under Section … In Barillaro v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Revieiv, 36 Pa.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • North American Rockwell Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    21 Pa. Commw. 437 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 27, 1975

    However, in Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Borough of Plum, 20 Pa. … In Ingersoll-Rand Company v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 12 Pa.

    Criticized by Epler v. North American Rockwell Corp., 482 Pa. 391 (1978)Cited 16 timesPublished
  • UGI Utilities, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    776 A.2d 344 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 21, 2001

    If an appeal is not filed within that time limit, the determination becomes final, thereby depriving the Board of jurisdiction over the matter. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transp. Auth. v. … In Miller v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Cerro Metal Products Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    855 A.2d 932 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 5, 2004

    Gumro v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Emerald Mines Corporation), 533 Pa. 461, 466-67 , 626 A.2d 94, 97 (1993). … Pistella v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Samson Buick Body Shop), 159 Pa.Cmwlth.342, 633 A.2d 230 (1993). 3 .

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Town & Country Management Corp. v. Zoning Hearing Board

    671 A.2d 790 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 14, 1996

    See Steinhauer v. Wilson, 336 Pa.Superior Ct. 165, 485 A.2d 477 (1984). … Valley View Civic Association v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 501 Pa. 550 , 462 A.2d 637 (1983). . Town & Country cites Pennsylvania Zoning Law and Practice, Robert S.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Kohr v. Lower Windsor Township Board of Supervisors

    867 A.2d 755 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 9, 2005

    In Muhlenberg College v. Zoning Hearing Board of the City of Allentown, 760 A.2d 443 (Pa.Cmwlth.2000), our Court reviewed Section 609(c) of the MPC. … Skepton v. Borough of Wilson, 562 Pa. 344 , 755 A.2d 1267 (2000). .The trial court also found that the Board failed to comply with Section 607(c) of the MPC.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    677 A.2d 857 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 21, 1996

    Estate of McGovern v. State Employees’ Retirement Board, 512 Pa. 377 , 517 A.2d 523 (1986). … In Pawlosky v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • H.A. Harper Sons, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    84 A.3d 363 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 2014

    The Board, relying on our opinions in Stroehmann Bakeries v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Plouse), 768 A.2d 1193 (Pa.Cmwlth.2001), Bethlehem Structural Products v. … Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Vernon), 789 A.2d 767 (Pa.Cmwlth.2001), appeal denied, 568 Pa. 706 , 796 A.2d 986 (2002), Department of Labor v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (U.S.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Ramsey v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    58 Pa. Commw. 288 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 6, 1981

    Kindrew v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 37 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 9 , 388 A.2d 801 (1978). … We must agree with the Board that such behavior constitutes willful misconduct. See Kindrew v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Globe Lining, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    121 Pa. Commw. 68 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 10, 1988

    Penn Pad Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Altholz), 83 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 490 , 478 A.2d 497 (1984). There is no dispute that Decedent met the first two criteria of Penn Pad. … S and S Associates, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Hochman), 77 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 11 , 465 A.2d 57 (1983).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Rodriques v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    49 Pa. Commw. 355 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 19, 1980

    The sole issue raised in the Board’s application is whether we erred in directing the Board to recompute Rodriques’s original maximum sentence. … Therefore, Rodriques was not detained solely by reason of the Board’s detainer and the provisions of Davis v. Cuyler, 38 Pa.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.