Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspacommwct

10,000+ results

1.75s

  • Holler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    104 A.3d 68 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 2014

    Beaver & Casey, Inc. v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeal Bd. (Soliday), 661 A.2d 40, 42 (Pa.Cmwlth. 1995); Jamison v. Workers’ Comp. Appeal Bd. … In an unreported opinion, Comcast Corporation v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Repko v. Zoning Hearing Board

    102 Pa. Commw. 272 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 1986

    The objectors cite Lakeside Youth Service v. Zoning Hearing Board of Upper Moreland Township, 51 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 485 , 414 A.2d 1115 (1980); Wengert v. Zoning Hearing Board of Upper Marion Township, 51 Pa. … Commonwealth Ct. 79 , 414 A.2d 148 (1980); and Pennsylvania George Junior Republic v. Zoning Hearing Board of Coolspring Township, 37 Pa.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Casne v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    962 A.2d 14 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 2008

    In Daniels v. Workers’ Comp. Appeal Bd. … Ryan v. Workers Compensation Appeal Board (Community Health Services), 550 Pa. 550 , 707 A.2d 1130 (1998). PEC Contr. Engs., 717 A.2d at 1088-89 .

    Cited 109 timesPublished
  • Stanish v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    11 A.3d 569 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 2010

    Ford Motor/Visteon Sys. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Gerlach), 970 A.2d 517 (Pa.Cmwlth.2009). … Kramer v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Rite Aid Corp.), 584 Pa. 309 , 883 A.2d 518 (2005).

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Strunk v. Zoning Hearing Board

    684 A.2d 682 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 1996

    Rural Area Concerned, Citizens, Inc. v. Fayette County Zoning Hearing Board, 166 Pa.Cmwlth. 520 , 646 A.2d 717 (1994), appeal denied, 540 Pa. 636 , 658 A.2d 798 (1995). … I The Court first addresses Owners’ equitable estoppel argument; if the Board and Township are estopped from denying the building/use permit, there is no need to reach the merits. Owners cite Cicchiello v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Heyman v. Zoning Hearing Board

    144 Pa. Commw. 167 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1991

    Overstreet v. Zoning Hearing Board of Schuylkill Township, 49 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 397, 412 A.2d 169 (1980). … See Everson v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Reed v. Zoning Hearing Board

    31 Pa. Commw. 605 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1977

    Our review is to determine whether the lower court abused its discretion or committed an error of law. *607 Ephross v. Zoning Hearing Board, 25 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 140, 359 A.2d 182 (1976). … Fidler v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 408 Pa. 260 , 182 A.2d 692 (1962). The Township here asks us to infer from Section 401’s definition of a mobile home that a mobile home cannot be a single-family dwelling.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Price v. Zoning Hearing Board

    72 Pa. Commw. 5 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 9, 1983

    The hearing was continued until the next board meeting May 27, 1981. … In Beekhuis v. Zoning Hearing Board of Middletown Township, 59 Pa.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Dore v. Zoning Hearing Board

    138 Pa. Commw. 101 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 1991

    The Board relies on Monteiro v. … Tirotta v. Zoning Hearing Board of Yeadon, 110 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 501, 532 A.2d 937 (1987); Visionquest National, Ltd. v. City of Franklin Zoning Board of Adjustment, 74 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 270, 459 A.2d 1327 (1983).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Earhart v. Board of Supervisors

    6 Pa. Commw. 455 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 1972

    In Waters v. … Philadelphia, 324 Pa. 129, 135 , 188 A. 314 ; Wallace v. Board of Education of Los Angeles, 147 P. 2d 8 ; Oystermen’s Dock Co. v. Downing, 249 N.Y.S. 558 , 232 App. Div. 295 ; 34 Am. Jur. 833 , §40; 35 Am.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Kahn

    13 Pa. Commw. 393 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 31, 1974

    Midland County, Texas, 390 U.S. 474 (1968); Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964); Butcher v. Bloom, 420 Pa. 305 , 216 A. 2d 457 (1966) ; and Butcher v. Bloom, 415 Pa. 438 , 203 A. 2d 556 (1964). … Our Supreme Court in Butcher v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Shelley v. Zoning Hearing Board

    71 Pa. Commw. 153 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 13, 1983

    Beekhuis v. Zoning Hearing Board of Middletown. 59 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 307, 313 , 429 A.2d 1231, 1235 (1981), in citing President Judge Cbxtmlish’s concurring opinion in Robin Corp. v. … A and D, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of East Nottingham Township, 32 Pa.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Caste v. Zoning Hearing Board

    70 Pa. Commw. 368 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1982

    Villa, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board, Old Forge Borough, 57 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 221 , 426 A.2d 1209 (1981). … Ellick v. Board of Supervisors, Worcester Township, 17 Pa.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Soergel v. Board of Supervisors

    12 Pa. Commw. 311 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 1974

    Soergel, cMef of police of Middlesex Township, received notice from the Township Board of Supervisors (Board), that he was being reduced in rank from chief to patrolman. … The Board decided, however, to reduce him only to sergeant.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Reinert v. WEISENBERG ZONING BOARD.

    48 Pa. Commw. 519 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1980

    Reinert (Appellant) and affirming the decision of the Weisenberg Zoning Board (Board). In 1966 Appellant acquired a 20 foot by 40 foot house situated on a one acre lot in a rural area of Weisenberg Township (Township). … His application was denied whereupon Appellant appealed to the Board. After a hearing the Board likewise denied the application in a decision containing findings of fact and conclusions of law.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • German v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    41 A.3d 947 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 9, 2012

    Zoning Hearing Bd. of Roaring Spring Borough, 106 Pa.Cmwlth. 389 , 526 A.2d 464 (1987)]) or changed circumstances which render the condition inappropriate (Amoco [Oil Co. v. … Where a trial court takes no additional evidence in an appeal from a decision of the Board, this Court is limited to considering whether the Board erred as a matter of law or abused its discretion. Singer v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Jacquelin v. Zoning Hearing Board

    152 Pa. Commw. 568 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 11, 1993

    The landowner appealed to this court, which also affirmed the board. Jacquelin v. Zoning Hearing Board, 126 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 20, 558 A.2d 189 (1989). … Kurtz v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Allied Chemical Corp.), 95 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 110, 504 A.2d 428 (1986).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • DeMeno v. Zoning Hearing Board

    82 Pa. Commw. 334 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 1984

    Only the zoning hearing board had participated as an appellee in the common pleas court. … The township had sought to intervene and be the appellant apparently in order to comply with Gilbert v. Montgomery Township Zoning Hearing Board, 58 Pa.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • David v. Zoning Hearing Board

    130 Pa. Commw. 201 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 1989

    Andreucci v. Zoning Hearing Board of Lower Mil *205 ford Township, 104 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 223, 522 A.2d 107 (1987). … Board of Supervisors of Greene Township v. Kuhl, 112 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 624, 536 A.2d 836 (1988).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Roundtree v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    116 A.3d 140 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 8, 2015

    See City of Philadelphia v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Rooney), 730 A.2d 1051, 1052 (Pa.Cmwlth.1999). … See Kurtz v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Waynesburg College), 794 A.2d 443, 447-48 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002).

    Cited 22 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.