Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspacommwct

10,000+ results

1.62s

  • McIntyre v. Board of Supervisors

    150 Pa. Commw. 15 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 1992

    On October 27, 1989, the Board of Supervisors of the Township (Board) filed a complaint in equity alleging that Landowners’ structure violated the 50 foot setback requirement of Section 1308. … McIntyre v. Board of Supervisors of Shohola Township, 141 Pa.Cmwlth. 713 , 595 A.2d 1328 (1991).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Berman v. Board of Commissioners

    147 Pa. Commw. 405 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1992

    Fernley v. Board of Supervisors of Schuylkill Township, 509 Pa. 413 , 502 A.2d 585 (1985). … Surrick v. Zoning Hearing Board of Upper Providence Township, 476 Pa. 182, 188 , 382 A.2d 105, 108 (1977). He cites Hopewell Township Board of Supervisors v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Lockwood v. Zoning Hearing Board

    115 Pa. Commw. 368 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1988

    Crawford; Green v. The Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Pittsburgh, 88 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 469 , 490 A.2d 488 (1985); Klanke v. The Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Pittsburgh, 83 Pa. … See Ignelzi v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Pittsburgh, 61 Pa.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Abernathy v. Zoning Hearing Board

    119 Pa. Commw. 193 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 1988

    Spencer v. McKean Township Zoning Hearing Board, 113 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 521 , 537 A.2d 943 (1988); Allegheny West Civil Council, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of City of Pittsburgh, 80 Pa. … An abuse of discretion occurs when the Boards findings are not supported by substantial evidence in the record. Feldman v. Zoning Hearing Board of the City of Pittsburgh, 89 Pa.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Angle v. Zoning Hearing Board

    83 Pa. Commw. 52 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 1984

    Somerton Civic Association v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 80 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 173 , 471 A.2d 578 (1984). … The owner’s appeal to the board was solely on the basis of a variance, the zoning hearing board properly dealt with the variance question, the trial court correctly found no legal nonconforming use basis for extending a living-room

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Hock v. Board of Supervisors

    154 Pa. Commw. 101 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 1993

    In Mill Valley Associates v. … Mill Valley Associates , quoting Martin v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Amandeo v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    37 A.3d 72 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 17, 2012

    Petitioner, Frank Amandeo (Claimant), petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board). … Wintermyer, Inc. v.

    Cited 90 timesPublished
  • Stolz v. Zoning Hearing Board

    130 Pa. Commw. 458 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 11, 1990

    Lewis v. … Board of Supervisors of Franklin Township v. Meals, 57 Pa.Cmwlth. 129 , 426 A.2d 1200 (1981); Board of Supervisors of Upper Frederick Township v. Moland Development Co., 19 Pa.Cmwlth. 207 , 339 A.2d 141 (1975).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Owens v. Zoning Hearing Board

    79 Pa. Commw. 229 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1983

    Citing Hopkins v. Zoning Hearing Board of Abington Township, 55 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 365 , 423 A.2d 1082 (1980) and Children’s Home of Easton v. City of Easton, 53 Pa. … See, Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas, 416 U.S. 1 (1974) (constitutionality of single family zoning ordinance provision prohibiting the cohabitation of six unrelated college students sustained); McGinnis Appeal, 68 Pa.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Page v. Zoning Hearing Board

    80 Pa. Commw. 589 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 1984

    See Draving v. Lower Southampton Township Zoning Hearing Board, 40 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 243 , 397 A.2d 54 (1979) (substantial ceramics operation not customary); Good v. Zoning Hearing Board of Haverford Township, 35 Pa. … Commonwealth Ct. 632 , 298 A.2d 629 (1972) (printing business not a home occupation); Boreth v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment, 396 Pa. 82 , 151 A.2d 474 (1959) (beauty shop in basement not customary); Gold v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hamilton v. Zoning Hearing Board

    57 Pa. Commw. 451 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1981

    The Board granted a validity variance on the grounds that the otherwise valid ordinance deprived Lafayette of any reasonable use of its property. See A & D, Inc. v. … Commonwealth Ct. 499 , 403 A.2d 1006 (1979); A & D, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of East Nottingham Township, supra.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hawk v. Zoning Hearing Board

    152 Pa. Commw. 48 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 1992

    The power to grant a special exception is vested in the local zoning hearing board. Heck v. Zoning Hearing Board of Harvey’s Lake Borough, 39 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 570, 397 A.2d 15 (1979). … Bray v. Zoning Hearing Board of Adjustment, 48 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 523, 410 A.2d 909 (1989).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Reynolds v. Zoning Hearing Board

    134 Pa. Commw. 382 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 1990

    See generally Page v. Zoning Hearing Board of Walker Township, 80 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 589, 471 A.2d 1348 (1984s). … Visionquest National, Ltd. v. City of Franklin Zoning Board of Adiustment, 74 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 270, 459 A.2d 1827 (1983).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Zoning Hearing Board v. Zlomsowitch

    87 Pa. Commw. 123 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1985

    Ramsey v. Zoning Hearing Board of the Borough of Dormont, 77 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 456 , 466 A.2d 267 (1983). … See Gilbert v. Montgomery Township Zoning Hearing Board, 58 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 296 , 427 A.2d 776 (1981). The court of common pleas ordered a remand to the ZHB so thát a permit could be issued.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Border v. Zoning Hearing Board

    74 Pa. Commw. 638 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 8, 1983

    Opinion by Judge Blatt, ' Russell Border (appellant) appeals an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County which quashed his appeal from a decision of the Zoning Hearing Board of tihe City of Easton (Board) … We held, however, in Upper Leacock Township Supervisors v. Zoning Hearing Board, 26 Pa.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Cracas v. Board of Supervisors

    89 Pa. Commw. 424 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 22, 1985

    Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 425 Pa. 43 , 228 A.2d 169 (1967). … General Battery Corporation v. Zoning Hearing Board of Alsace Township, 29 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 498 , 371 A.2d 1030 (1977).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Fargo v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    148 A.3d 514 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 11, 2016

    See City of McKeesport v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Miletti), 746 A.2d 87, 89 (Pa. 2000); Hutz, ___ A.3d at ___, slip op. at 32; see also Tooey v. … C.S. § 704; Repash v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (City of Philadelphia), 961 A.2d 227, 231 n.5 (Pa.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Baumann v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    147 A.3d 1283 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 23, 2016

    Delaware Cnty. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeal Bd. (Browne), 964 A.2d 29, 35 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2008) (emphasis added); see also Johnson v. Workers’ Comp. Appeal Bd. (Bucks Cnty. Intermediate Unit) (Pa. Cmwlth. … Indiana Floral Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeal Bd. (Brown), 793 A.2d 984, 991 n.18 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002). Here, a violation was found, but no penalty assessed. See Dep’t of Labor & Indus. v. Workmen’s Comp.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • McVay v. Zoning Hearing Board

    91 Pa. Commw. 287 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 1985

    In Gardner v. … Human Relations Commission v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Collis v. Zoning Hearing Board

    51 Pa. Commw. 368 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 14, 1980

    Hanna v. *373 Board of Adjustment, 408 Pa. 306 , 183 A.2d 539 (1962). … Hanna v. Board of Adjustment, supra. Expansions of nonconforming uses are also protected to the extent that they are necessary to provide for the natural expansion and accommodation of increased trade.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.