Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.29s
ODC, Pet v. Stephanie Ashley Hand
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 2021
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2454 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : No. 21 DB 2021 v … Respondent shall comply with all of the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
Cited 0 timesPublishedHussey v. WCAB (Chiles) Pet of: Hussey
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 25, 2017
AND STATE : No. 79 WAL 2017 WORKERS' INSURANCE FUND : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from v. … : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (CHILES)
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn the Matter of: Douglas B. Breidenbach, Jr.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 2020
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2615 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 89 DB 2019 : v … County) : Respondent : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 13th day of February, 2020, on certification by the Disciplinary Board
Cited 0 timesPublishedDandar, R. v. PA Att. Gen. Kane
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 2016
DANDAR, : No. 92 WM 2016 : Petitioner : : : v … KATHLEEN KANE, : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION & PAROLE, : : Respondents
Cited 0 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 2019
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2576 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 19 DB 2019 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMartin h/w v. Heidelberg Twp ZHB
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2018
: MARTIN, HUSBAND AND WIFE : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : v. … : : : HEIDELBERG TOWNSHIP ZONING : HEARING BOARD : :
Cited 0 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 22, 2018
: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION : BOARD OF REVIEW, :
Cited 0 timesPublishedThomas v. Altoona & Logan Valley Electric Co.
236 Pa. 365 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 6, 1912
On this branch of the case the defense was that the plaintiff attempted to board a moving car, and if so, there could be no recovery. … There was no recovery in that case because the court below and here held that the injuries were caused by an independent contractor for whose negligence the railway company was not liable: Thomas v.
Cited 2 timesPublished232 Pa. 547 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 1911
Justice Brown, The injunction appealed from followed findings by the court below that the defendants were about to engage in the horse and cattle business in an exclusively residential section of the borough of Carlisle, … One requirement would make the remedy largely useless and the other impracticable: Miley v. A’Hearn (Ky.), 18 S. W. Repr. 529.
Cited 15 timesPublishedSmith's Transfer Corp. v. Voice of Teamsters Democratic Organizing Committee
409 Pa. 217 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1962
The merits of the dispute involved as to whether or not these employees may be disciplined by the employer is a matter within the exclusive legal jurisdiction of the *219 National Labor Relations Board. … See, Terrizzi Beverage Co. v. Local Union No. 830, 408 Pa. 380 , 184 A. 2d 243 (1962), and authorities cited therein.
Cited 5 timesPublishedRafaele, L. v. WCAB (Life Path)
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 2017
RAFAELE, : No. 322 MAL 2017 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from v … : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (LIFE PATH, INC.), :
Cited 0 timesPublished6 Serg. & Rawle 286 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 1820
This is very fully considered by the late President Rush in the case in 1 Browne 1.; and the law is clearly and accurately laid down. So it will be found in 8 Johns. 342 . Under the statute of W. … Miles v. O’Hara. But what removes all doubt of the true construction of the act, is that where the Legislature intended to establish the common law action, they do so in .express terms ; they use negative words.
Cited 2 timesPublished363 Pa. 153 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 1949
Davidheiser, 133 Pa. 226 , 19 A. 400 ; Miller v. Laubach, 47 Pa. 154 . … Brown et al., 165 Pa. 267 , 30 A. 844 ; Kauffman v. Griesemer, 26 Pa. 407 .
Cited 28 timesPublished4 Watts & Serg. 201 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1842
. — A foreign attachment which, like outlawry, is a process to enforce an appearance to a personal action, can be legally sued out only for a debt presently demandable; and it was held in Pratt v. Stryer, (1 P. A. … In Hurst v. Brown, (Peake’s N. P. Ca. 54), Lord Kenyon said that all debts, due or undue, might support a commission; but that case was overruled by Hawkins v. Duperoy, (9 East 489), and Parslow v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 2017
: No. 116 EM 2017 : Petitioner : : : v … : : : MARK GARMAN PA BOARD OF : PROBATION & PAROLE, :
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of Scranton v. E.B. Jermyn Lodge No. 2 of the Fraternal Order of Police
606 Pa. 192 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 2010
(4) Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in faffing to remand the matter to the Act 111 board of arbitration instead of modifying the interest arbitration award itself? … *193 This case is hereby consolidated with City of Scranton v. Fire Fighters Local Union No. 60 of the International Association of Fire Fighters, AFL-CIO, 606 Pa. 190 , 995 A.2d 1180 (2010).
Cited 3 timesPublished330 Pa. 4 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1937
Co. v. … See Travis v. Brown, 43 Pa. 9 . See also People v. Molineux, supra, as to the admissibility at common law of evidence as to disputed handwriting. In Seaman v.
Cited 96 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 28, 2017
: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION : BOARD OF REVIEW, :
Cited 0 timesPublished411 Pa. 96 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 29, 1963
Pittsburgh Limestone Corp., 375 Pa. 390 , 100 A. 2d 595 ; and (2) under the principle of "the law of the case," citing Brown Estate, 408 Pa. 214, 230, 231 , 183 A. 2d 307 , and Burke v. … See Brown Estate, 408 Pa. 214, 227 , 183 A. 2d 307 ; Saunders Estate, 393 Pa. 527 , 143 A. 2d 367 .
Overruled on other grounds by Estate of Tyler, 474 Pa. 148 (1977)Cited 76 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 2019
: No. 61 EM 2019 ACKRIDGE, : : Petitioner : : v … TALABER, ESQUIRE, : DEFENDANT SECRETARY, : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE ["PBPP"], ET : AL,
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna