Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

1.05s

  • ODC v. Craig Cohen

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 2019

    OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2593 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 52 DB 2019 : v … Respondent shall comply with all of the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217, and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Roos v. Silk Mills (B. Co. Tr. Co.)

    342 Pa. 81 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 27, 1941

    L. 7, 12 PS § 782, “interest is a legal incident of every judgment: Cochran v. Cummings, 4 Dallas, 250 ; Commonwealth v. Miller, 8 S. & R. 452. … ‘Where the terms of an obligation comprehend interest, it is inaccurate to say interest is added by way of damages, for it is a substantive part of the debt as much as the principal is Hummel v. Brown, 24 Pa. 310 .”

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Farkas, S. v. UCBR

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2017

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION : BOARD OF REVIEW, :

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Durkin v. Kingston Coal Co.

    29 L.R.A. 808 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1895

    Such was the case in Godcharles v. Wigeman, supra. … Lehigh Valley Coal Company v. Jones, 86 Pa. 432 ; Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. v. Carroll, 89 Pa. 374 ; Waddell et al. v. Simoson and Wife, 112 Pa. 567 .

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • ODC v. David Leonard Quatrella

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 2019

    OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2370 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 49 DB 2017 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fargo, A. v. WCAB (City of Phila.)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 5, 2017

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (CITY OF PHILADELPHIA), :

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bruen, III, H., Aplt. v. PBPP

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 2017

    No. 39 MAP 2017 : Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court dated April 24, v … PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE, : : Appellees : :

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wolfe, R. v. WCAB (Ervin Ind.)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 13, 2016

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (ERVIN INDUSTRIES, INC.), :

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Crocker, D. v. WCAB (Dixie Consumer Prod.)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 13, 2016

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (DIXIE CONSUMER : PRODUCTS, LLC),

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Molchany, B.

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 2018

    MIDDLE DISTRICT BRADLEY DWAYNE MOLCHANY, : No. 133 MM 2018 : Petitioner : : : v … : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : D/B/A LEHIGH COUNTY COURT OF : COMMON PLEAS, LEHIGH COUNTY : DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, : PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF : CORRECTIONS PENNSYLVANIA BOARD

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Anonymous No. 35 D.B. 88

    8 Pa. D. & C.4th 344 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 1990

    See Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lucarini, 504 Pa. 271 , 472 A.2d 186 (1983), and Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Knepp, 497 Pa. 396 , 441 A.2d 1197 (1982). … RECOMMENDATION The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania unanimously recommends that the respondent be disbarred.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kenney, J. v. WCAB Pet.: Lwr Pottsgrove

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 6, 2020

    PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT JAMES KENNEY : No. 596 MAL 2019 : : v … : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re: Amendment of Rule 208 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 27, 2022

    : DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 27th day of July, 2022, upon the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board … Supreme Court of Pennsylvania; which followed the proposal to amend Pa.R.D.E. 208 having been published for comment in the Pennsylvania Bulletin, 52 Pa.B. 965 (February 12, 2022): IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article V,

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ODC v. Michael Joseph Cammarano, Jr.

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 2021

    : Petitioner : No. 147 DB 2021 : : Attorney Registration No. 308844 v … Respondent : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 17th day of December, 2021, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McKeen v. Delaware Division Canal Co.

    49 Pa. 424 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1865

    Beginning with Carson v. … Coons, 6 Barr 379; Mifllin v. Railroad Co., 4 Harris 182; New York and Erie Railroad Co. v. Young, 9 Casey 175; Watson v. P. & C. Railroad Co., 1 Wright 469 . The judgment is affirmed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • ODC v. Gordon D. Fisher

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 2020

    C-4-19-503 : : Attorney Registration No. 1207 v. … : Respondent : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 23rd day of December, 2020, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dolquist, T. v. WCAB (City of New Castle)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 24, 2020

    PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT TERRY DOLQUIST : No. 162 WAL 2020 : : v … : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hospital v. Philadelphia County

    24 Pa. 229 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1855

    This is the principle of the decision in the Borough of Allentown v. Saeger, 8 Harris 421. … The threat of legal process is not such duress, for the party may plead and make proof, and show that he is not liable: Brown v. McKinnally, 1 Esp. Rep. 279.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Weaver, S. v. SERB

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 17, 2016

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT : BOARD, :

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Permenter, R. v. Ferguson, T.

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 10, 2020

    No. 56 EM 2020 : Petitioner : : : v … TALABER, : SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE, COREY : DAVIS ADMINISTRATOR OF KINTOCK : CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.