Case law

Kaufhold v. Taylor, Trustee

360 Pa. 372 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1948

After receiving the consent of the Liquor Control Board to the transfer of the liquor license, Kaufhold paid Taylor the full consideration. … For that reason the parol evidence rule does not apply: Hanauer v. National Surety Co., 279 Pa. 345, 348 , 123 A. 863 ; Green v. Green, 255 Pa. 224 , 99 A. 801 ; Alexander v. Righter, 240 Pa. 22 , 87 A. 427 .

Moumen, A. v. WCAB (Mid Atlantic Trucking)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 16, 2017

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (SUPREME MID ATLANTIC : TRUCKING),

Ortiz, R. v. PBPP

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 2017

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE, :

Ortiz, M. v. PBPP

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 2017

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE, :

Sperow, S., Aplt. v. Ransom

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 2019

: Appellant : : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court, dismissing the v … WAYMART, ET AL., AND THE : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE, : : Appellees :

Connolly, S. v. WCAB (Craft Oil Corp)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 2018

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (CRAFT OIL CORPORATION), :

Johnson, K. v. PBPP

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 2016

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE, :

Gates v. Keichline

282 Pa. 584 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1925

Brown, 165 Pa. 275, 283 ; and other cases, infra. … Brown, 165 Pa. 275, 283 ; Kauffman v. Kauffman, 266 Pa. 274, 275, 276 . The tax assessment in Mrs. Gardner’s name (Miller v. Baker, 160 Pa. 172, 179 ; Irwin v. Patchen, 164 Pa. 51, 71 ; James v.

Lee, J. and Lee, E., Pets. v. WCAB (City of Phila)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 2017

: Petitioners : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (CITY OF PHILADELPHIA), :

Commonwealth v. March

248 Pa. 434 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1915

This assignment must therefore be disregarded: Com. v. VanHorn, 188 Pa. 143 . … That this can be done was expressly ruled in Brown v. Commonwealth, 78 Pa. 122 . We can add nothing of value in disposing of this appeal by discussing the numerous assignments of error not already referred to.

ODC, Pet v. Thomas Patrick Connelly Jr.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 2023

OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2936 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner No. 166 DB 2022 V. … (Berks County) ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 6t" day of January, 2023, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board

Pocono Community Theater v. Monroe Co Bd AA

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 2016

: Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF : ASSESSMENT APPEALS, :

Griffin, L. v. WCAB (Luzerne Co C&Y)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 9, 2018

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (LUZERNE COUNTY CHILDREN : AND YOUTH),

Johnson Co. v. Miller

174 Pa. 605 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 6, 1896

Bonham, 9 W. & S. 27 ; Reynolds v. Reynolds Lumber Co., 169 Pa. 626 . … The sale was effected by means of a written instrument regularly executed by the proper officers of the company in pursuance of a resolution of the board of directors.

Sproul v. Standard Plate Glass Co.

201 Pa. 103 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 1902

The general rule was forcibly stated by Sharswood, J., in Taylor v. … It was held in National Bank of the Republic v.

ODC v. Christopher B. Jones

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 2022

Petitioner : No. 1 DB 2022 : : Attorney Registration No. 64689 v … Respondent : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2022, having received no response to a Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board

Wark & Co. v. Twelfth & Sansom Corp.

378 Pa. 578 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 1954

We may not assume that the Board neither considered the evidence nor read the respondent’s brief . . . , nor may we in such circumstances ‘probe the mental processes’ of the Board ‘in reaching [its] conclusions’... … ": N ational Labor Relations Board v. Baldwin Locomotive Works, 128 F. 2d 39, 47, 48 (C.A. 3). The rule is equally applicable in respect of arbitration proceedings.

Ulrich v. Arnold

120 Pa. 170 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 1888

That Arnold had no better claim than his wife, for the value of her services, was ruled distinctly in Patton v. Conn, 114 Pa. 183 , and in Houck v. Houck, 99 Pa. 552 . … For the small balance due for board, $22.23, the plaintiff is clearly entitled to recover, and as to that there is no dispute.

Carmona, L, Pet v. WCAB (Algh Valley School)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 2018

Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (ALLEGHENY VALLEY SCHOOL : OF PHILADELPHIA

Fisher, A. v. PBPP

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 16, 2017

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE, :