Case law

Pickering v. Shotwell

10 Pa. 23 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 1848

The doctrine was fully discussed in Moggridge v. Thackwell, 7 Ves. 36, and Mills v. Farmer, 1 Meriv. 54, both of them cases which are apposite to the present. . … The influence of the church establishment was, doubtless,, felt in Browne v.

Mnyk. Nbrhd. Coun., Inc. v. ZBA

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 2018

: Petitioner : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : v … : : : ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT C/O : PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT : AND LENNART N.

Commonwealth v. Mudd

589 Pa. 160 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 2006

Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, 654 , 99 S.Ct. 1391, 1396 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979); Commonwealth v. Blouse, 531 Pa. 167, 169 , 611 A.2d 1177, 1178 (1992), citing Brown v. … Blouse, 531 Pa. at 170 , 611 A.2d at 1178 , citing Brown, 443 U.S. at 50-51 , 99 S.Ct. at 2640 . (emphasis added).

Jensen, S. v. WCAB (Pleasant Valley Manor)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 8, 2017

No. 860 MAL 2016 Petitioner : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v. … WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (PLEASANT VALLEY MANOR AND PMA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION), Respondents ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 8th day of May, 2017, the

Santana, M. v. PBPP & AG J. Shapiro

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 2017

: No. 147 MM 2017 : Petitioner : : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE AND : ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH

Merrell, W. v. WCAB (DOC)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 2017

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (COMMONWEALTH OF : PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF

Brinkley, N. v. WCAB (US Airways)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 9, 2018

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (US AIRWAYS, INC., NEW : HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

Keenan v. Union Traction Co.

202 Pa. 107 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1902

Justice Brown, At the close of plaintiff’s testimony the learned trial judge directed a verdict for the defendant. He could not have avoided doing so in the light of the clear contributory negligence of the appellant. … He did not continue to look until he reached the track, and yet that was his duty: Ehrisman v. East Harrisburg City Pass. Ry. Co., 150 Pa. 180 ; Burke v. Traction Co., 198 Pa. 497 ; McCracken v.

Shaffer's Appeal

323 Pa. 320 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1936

The return board consolidated 521 Democratic votes and seven nonpartisan votes for E. C. Shaffer and 32 Citizens ticket votes for E. C. … Prospect Park Board, 318 Pa. 582 . This case is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Elder W. Marshall for the court below, which will be found in the reporter’s notes.

Small v. Horn

554 Pa. 600 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 1998

The Court continued: Nor is there merit to the argument that the Board violated the Documents Law. … See, e.g., Bell v.

Wang, Y., Pets. v. WCAB (New Li Nail Spa)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from Petitioners : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : : v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (NEW LI NAIL SPA, INC.), :

City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Parking Authority

568 Pa. 430 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 31, 2002

See generally Marrero v. … See also Rhoads v.

Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. Getz & Getz & Co.

113 Pa. 214 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 1886

Co. v. Davis, 26 Pa. St., 238. He is entitled to compensation according- to his interest: Brown v. Powell, 1 Casey, 230. We do not understand thé existence of this rule as to the right of H. S. … When in a civil case no request is made, the mere omission to charge upon a particular point is not ground of error: Fox v. Fox, 96 Pa. St., 60. The judgment is affirmed.

Vierling v. Baxter

293 Pa. 52 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1928

He promised to and did secure the resignation of the old board of directors and a new board took its place. … Co. v. Knofsky et al., 291 Pa. 60 .

Bellamy,T. v. WCAB (Univ. of PA)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 10, 2017

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (HOSPITAL OF THE : UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA

Pannebaker v. Tuscarora Valley Railroad

219 Pa. 60 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 1907

In Stirling v. Vaughan, 11 East, 619, Lord Ellenborough said: “ The law will presume, if nothing appear to the contrary, that every person accepts that which is for their benefit.” In Bank of U. S. v. Dandridge, 25 U. … It is only necessary to refer to the most recent on the subject: Presbyterian Board of Relief, etc., v. Gilbee, 212 Pa. 310 .

Commonwealth v. Graham

528 Pa. 250 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1991

In reversing the judgment of sentence in this case, the Superior Court properly relied upon this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. … See also, Fleming James, Jr., Civil Procedure (Little Brown & Co. 1965), § 7.11.

Kimberly Clark Corp. v. WCAB (Bromley)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 27, 2017

Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (BROMLEY), :

ODC v. Michael E. Hughes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2020

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2724 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 75 DB 2020 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Barnes v. Pickett Hardware Co.

203 Pa. 570 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 13, 1902

In Burr v. … See further as to the strictness of the identification required, Landis v. Roth, 109 Pa. 621 , and Rosencrance v. Johnson, 191 Pa. 520 .